Effect of PET-CT on disease recurrence and management in patients with potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial.


Journal

Journal of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1096-9098
Titre abrégé: J Surg Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0222643

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2020
Historique:
received: 06 12 2019
accepted: 27 01 2020
pubmed: 9 2 2020
medline: 25 4 2020
entrez: 9 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Preoperative evaluation of resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases with positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) is used extensively. The PETCAM trial evaluated the effect of PET-CT (intervention) vs no PET-CT (control) on surgical management. PET-CT resulted in 8% change in surgical management, therefore, we aimed to compare long-term outcomes (disease-free [DFS], overall survival [OS]). Trial recruitment (2005-2010) had prospective follow-up until 2013. Events from 2013 to 2017 were collected retrospectively. Survival was described by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank test. Oncologic risk factors were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models. Among 404 patients randomized, there were no differences in DFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.43) or OS (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.78-1.32) between groups. For all patients randomized, median DFS (PET-CT vs no PET-CT) was 16 months (95% CI, 13-18) and 15 months (95% CI, 11-22), P = .33. For patients who underwent liver resection (n = 368), DFS (17 vs 16 months, P = .51) and OS (58 months vs 52 months, P = .90) were similar between groups, respectively. Risk factors for DFS and OS were age, tumor size, node-positive disease, extrahepatic metastases and disease-free duration. Preoperative PET-CT changes surgical management in a small percentage of cases, without effect on recurrence rates or long-term survival.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Preoperative evaluation of resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases with positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) is used extensively. The PETCAM trial evaluated the effect of PET-CT (intervention) vs no PET-CT (control) on surgical management. PET-CT resulted in 8% change in surgical management, therefore, we aimed to compare long-term outcomes (disease-free [DFS], overall survival [OS]).
METHODS METHODS
Trial recruitment (2005-2010) had prospective follow-up until 2013. Events from 2013 to 2017 were collected retrospectively. Survival was described by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank test. Oncologic risk factors were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among 404 patients randomized, there were no differences in DFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.43) or OS (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.78-1.32) between groups. For all patients randomized, median DFS (PET-CT vs no PET-CT) was 16 months (95% CI, 13-18) and 15 months (95% CI, 11-22), P = .33. For patients who underwent liver resection (n = 368), DFS (17 vs 16 months, P = .51) and OS (58 months vs 52 months, P = .90) were similar between groups, respectively. Risk factors for DFS and OS were age, tumor size, node-positive disease, extrahepatic metastases and disease-free duration.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Preoperative PET-CT changes surgical management in a small percentage of cases, without effect on recurrence rates or long-term survival.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32034769
doi: 10.1002/jso.25864
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1001-1006

Subventions

Organisme : Ontario Ministry of Health & Long-term Care
ID : grant-in-aid

Informations de copyright

© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Références

Elias D, Ouellet JF, Bellon N, Pignon JP, Pocard M, Lasser P. Extrahepatic disease does not contraindicate hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2003;90(5):567-574.
Selzner M, Hany TF, Wildbrett P, McCormack L, Kadry Z, Clavien PA. Does the novel PET/CT imaging modality impact on the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer of the liver? Ann Surg. 2004;240(6):1027-1034. discussion 1035-1026.
Cipe G, Ergul N, Hasbahceci M, et al. Routine use of positron-emission tomography/computed tomography for staging of primary colorectal cancer: does it affect clinical management? World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11:49.
McLeish AR, Lee ST, Byrne AJ, Scott AM. Impact of (1)(8)F-FDG-PET in decision making for liver metastectomy of colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg. 2012;82(1-2):30-35.
Amin A, Reddy A, Wilson R, Jha M, Miranda S, Amin J. Unnecessary surgery can be avoided by judicious use of PET/CT scanning in colorectal cancer patients. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2012;43(4):594-598.
Engledow AH, Skipworth JR, Pakzad F, Imber C, Ell PJ, Groves AM. The role of 18FDG PET/CT in the management of colorectal liver metastases. Hepato Pancreato Biliary. 2012;14(1):20-25.
Ruers TJM, Wiering B, van der Sijp JRM, et al. Improved selection of patients for hepatic surgery of colorectal liver metastases with (18)F-FDG PET: a randomized study. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(7):1036-1041.
Daza JF, Solis NM, Parpia S, et al. A meta-analysis exploring the role of PET and PET-CT in the management of potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(8):1341-1348.
Moulton CA, Gu CS, Law CH, et al. Effect of PET before liver resection on surgical management for colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311(18):1863-1869.
Serrano PE, Gafni A, Gu CS, et al. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) versus no PET-CT in the management of potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases: cost implications of a randomized controlled trial. J Oncol Pract. 2016;12(7):e765-e774.
Charnsangavej C, Clary B, Fong Y, Grothey A, Pawlik TM, Choti MA. Selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(10):1261-1268.
Tomlinson JS, Jarnagin WR, DeMatteo RP, et al. Actual 10-year survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases defines cure. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(29):4575-4580.
Nordlinger B, Sorbye H, Glimelius B, et al. Perioperative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC 40983): long-term results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(12):1208-1215.
Gloeckler Ries LA, Reichman ME, Lewis DR, Hankey BF, Edwards BK. Cancer survival and incidence from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program. Oncologist. 2003;8(6):541-552.
Choti MA, Sitzmann JV, Tiburi MF, et al. Trends in long-term survival following liver resection for hepatic colorectal metastases. Ann Surg. 2002;235(6):759-766.
Neal CP, Nana GR, Jones M, et al. Repeat hepatectomy is independently associated with favorable long-term outcome in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Cancer Med. 2017;6(2):331-338.
Petrowsky H, Gonen M, Jarnagin W, et al. Second liver resections are safe and effective treatment for recurrent hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: a bi-institutional analysis. Ann Surg. 2002;235(6):863-871.
Acciuffi S, Meyer F, Bauschke A, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors after resection of solitary liver metastasis in colorectal cancer: a 22-year bicentre study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144(3):593-599.
Bellier J, De Wolf J, Hebbar M, et al. Repeated resections of hepatic and pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer provide long-term survival. World J Surg. 2018;42(4):1171-1179.
Lintoiu-Ursut B, Tulin A, Constantinoiu S. Recurrence after hepatic resection in colorectal cancer liver metastasis -Review article. J Med Life. 2015;8:12-14. Spec Issue.
Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, Brennan MF, Blumgart LH. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 1999;230(3):309-318. discussion 318-321.
Konopke R, Kersting S, Distler M, et al. Prognostic factors and evaluation of a clinical score for predicting survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Liver Int. 2009;29(1):89-102.
Muto T, Nagawa H, Nagashima I, et al. A new scoring system to classify patients with colorectal liver metastases: proposal of criteria to select candidates for hepatic resection. J Hepatobil Pancreat Surg. 2004;11(2):79-83.
Nordlinger B, Van Cutsem E, Gruenberger T, et al. Combination of surgery and chemotherapy and the role of targeted agents in the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases: recommendations from an expert panel. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(6):985-992.
Hallet J, Sa Cunha A, Adam R, et al. Factors influencing recurrence following initial hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2016;103(10):1366-1376.

Auteurs

Pablo E Serrano (PE)

Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.

Chu-Shu Gu (CS)

Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.

Carol-Anne Moulton (CA)

University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario.

Mohamed Husien (M)

Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener, Ontario.

Diederick Jalink (D)

Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario.

Guillaume Martel (G)

The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario.

Melanie E Tsang (ME)

St. Joseph's Health Centre, Toronto, Ontario.

Julie Hallet (J)

Odette Cancer Centre - Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario.

Vivian McAlister (V)

London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario.

Steven Gallinger (S)

University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario.

Mark Levine (M)

Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH