Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of spirometry for COPD screening in general practice.
Aged
Case-Control Studies
Family Practice
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Forced Expiratory Volume
General Practice
/ methods
General Practitioners
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Mass Screening
/ methods
Middle Aged
Nurses
/ statistics & numerical data
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
/ diagnosis
Reproducibility of Results
Spirometry
/ methods
Vital Capacity
Airflow limitation
COPD
General practitioners
Nurses
Screening
Spirometry
Journal
Respiratory medicine and research
ISSN: 2590-0412
Titre abrégé: Respir Med Res
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101746324
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
17
04
2019
revised:
06
06
2019
accepted:
10
07
2019
pubmed:
9
2
2020
medline:
3
6
2021
entrez:
9
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Proper diagnosis of COPD remains a challenge. Spirometry testing in primary care may help to reduce misdiagnosis, but its reliability as a diagnostic instrument needs to be assessed. To investigate (1) the validity of spirometry testing performed in primary care and (2) the accuracy of the diagnostic of airflow limitation obtained by these tests. Subjects attending a COPD screening programme had screening spirometry performed either by general practitioners (GPs) or by trained nurses or technicians, who had all received two 3-hour training sessions. Subjects with airflow limitation and a subset of subjects with normal spirometry at screening were invited to undergo confirmatory spirometry performed by trained nurses in a pulmonary function laboratory. Of the 4610 subjects who attended the screening sessions, 96.5% had a valid screening spirometry test. A total of 392 subjects attended the confirmatory sessions. Values measured by screening spirometry were satisfactory compared with those of confirmatory spirometry (r Spirometry performed in primary care by trained personnel reliably identifies persistent airflow limitation. This may encourage pulmonologists to collaborate with primary care providers with the aim of improving appropriate diagnosis of COPD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32035336
pii: S2590-0412(19)30020-0
doi: 10.1016/j.resmer.2019.07.004
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
31-36Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.