Organ preservation with chemoradiotherapy plus local excision for rectal cancer: 5-year results of the GRECCAR 2 randomised trial.


Journal

The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology
ISSN: 2468-1253
Titre abrégé: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101690683

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2020
Historique:
received: 07 10 2019
revised: 18 11 2019
accepted: 19 11 2019
pubmed: 12 2 2020
medline: 21 7 2020
entrez: 12 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

GRECCAR 2 was the first multicentre, randomised trial to compare local excision with total mesorectal excision in downstaged low rectal cancer. Encouraging oncological results were noted at 3 years' follow-up but needed to be corroborated with longer follow-up. In this study, we aimed to report the 5-year oncological outcomes, including local recurrence, metastatic disease, and survival. Patients age 18 years and older with T2T3 low rectal cancer, of maximum size 4 cm, who were clinically good responders after chemoradiotherapy (residual tumour ≤2 cm) were randomly assigned before surgery to either local excision or total mesorectal excision. Randomisation was centralised and not stratified and used permuted blocks of size eight. In the local excision group, a completion total mesorectal excision was performed if pathological tumour stage was ypT2-3. The primary objective of this study was to assess the 5-year oncological outcomes of local recurrence, metastatic disease, disease-free survival, overall survival, and cancer-specific mortality, which were the secondary endpoints of GRECCAR 2. We used Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox modelling to estimate and compare recurrence and survival in modified intention-to-treat and as-treated populations. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00427375. Between March 1, 2007, and Sept 24, 2012, 148 patients who were good clinical responders were randomly assigned to treatment, three patients were excluded after randomisation (because they had metastatic disease, tumour >8 cm from anal verge, or withdrew consent), leaving 145 for analysis: 74 in the local excision group and 71 in the total mesorectal excision group. Median follow-up was 60 months (IQR 58-60) in the local excision group and 60 months (57-60) in the total mesorectal excision group. 23 patients died and five were lost to follow-up. In the local excision group, 26 had a completion total mesorectal excision for ypT2-3 tumour. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, there was no difference between the local excision and total mesorectal excision groups in 5-year local recurrence (7% [95% CI 3-16] vs 7% [3-16]; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·71 [95% CI 0·19-2·58]; p=0·60), metastatic disease (18% [CI 11-30] vs 19% [11-31]; 0·86 [0·36-2·06]; p=0·73), overall survival (84% [73-91] vs 82% [71-90]; 0·92 [0·38-2·22]; p=0·85), disease-free survival (70% [58-79] vs 72% [60-82]; 0·87 [0·44-1·72]; p=0·68), or cancer-specific mortality (7% [3-17] vs 10% [5-20]; 0·65 [0·17-2·49]; p=0·53). The 5-year results of this multicentre randomised trial corroborate the 3-year results, providing no evidence of difference in oncological outcomes between local excision and total mesorectal excision. Local excision can be proposed in selected patients having a small T2T3 low rectal cancer with a good clinical response after chemoradiotherapy. National Cancer Institute of France.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
GRECCAR 2 was the first multicentre, randomised trial to compare local excision with total mesorectal excision in downstaged low rectal cancer. Encouraging oncological results were noted at 3 years' follow-up but needed to be corroborated with longer follow-up. In this study, we aimed to report the 5-year oncological outcomes, including local recurrence, metastatic disease, and survival.
METHODS
Patients age 18 years and older with T2T3 low rectal cancer, of maximum size 4 cm, who were clinically good responders after chemoradiotherapy (residual tumour ≤2 cm) were randomly assigned before surgery to either local excision or total mesorectal excision. Randomisation was centralised and not stratified and used permuted blocks of size eight. In the local excision group, a completion total mesorectal excision was performed if pathological tumour stage was ypT2-3. The primary objective of this study was to assess the 5-year oncological outcomes of local recurrence, metastatic disease, disease-free survival, overall survival, and cancer-specific mortality, which were the secondary endpoints of GRECCAR 2. We used Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox modelling to estimate and compare recurrence and survival in modified intention-to-treat and as-treated populations. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00427375.
FINDINGS
Between March 1, 2007, and Sept 24, 2012, 148 patients who were good clinical responders were randomly assigned to treatment, three patients were excluded after randomisation (because they had metastatic disease, tumour >8 cm from anal verge, or withdrew consent), leaving 145 for analysis: 74 in the local excision group and 71 in the total mesorectal excision group. Median follow-up was 60 months (IQR 58-60) in the local excision group and 60 months (57-60) in the total mesorectal excision group. 23 patients died and five were lost to follow-up. In the local excision group, 26 had a completion total mesorectal excision for ypT2-3 tumour. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, there was no difference between the local excision and total mesorectal excision groups in 5-year local recurrence (7% [95% CI 3-16] vs 7% [3-16]; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·71 [95% CI 0·19-2·58]; p=0·60), metastatic disease (18% [CI 11-30] vs 19% [11-31]; 0·86 [0·36-2·06]; p=0·73), overall survival (84% [73-91] vs 82% [71-90]; 0·92 [0·38-2·22]; p=0·85), disease-free survival (70% [58-79] vs 72% [60-82]; 0·87 [0·44-1·72]; p=0·68), or cancer-specific mortality (7% [3-17] vs 10% [5-20]; 0·65 [0·17-2·49]; p=0·53).
INTERPRETATION
The 5-year results of this multicentre randomised trial corroborate the 3-year results, providing no evidence of difference in oncological outcomes between local excision and total mesorectal excision. Local excision can be proposed in selected patients having a small T2T3 low rectal cancer with a good clinical response after chemoradiotherapy.
FUNDING
National Cancer Institute of France.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32043980
pii: S2468-1253(19)30410-8
doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30410-8
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00427375']

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

465-474

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Eric Rullier (E)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Haut-Lévèque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: eric.rullier@chu-bordeaux.fr.

Véronique Vendrely (V)

Radiotherapy Department, Haut-Lévèque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, France.

Julien Asselineau (J)

INSERM CIC1401-EC, Bordeaux, France; CHU Bordeaux, Service d'information médicale, Bordeaux, France.

Philippe Rouanet (P)

Département de Chirurgie Oncologique, ICM Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France.

Jean-Jacques Tuech (JJ)

Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France.

Alain Valverde (A)

Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France.

Cecile de Chaisemartin (C)

Département de Chirurgie Oncologique, Institut Paoli Calmette, Marseille, France.

Michel Rivoire (M)

Département de Chirurgie Oncologique, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

Bertrand Trilling (B)

Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital A. Michallon, La Tronche, France.

Mehrdad Jafari (M)

Département de Chirurgie Oncologique, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.

Guillaume Portier (G)

Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Purpan, Toulouse, France.

Bernard Meunier (B)

Service de Chirurgie Viscérale, CHU Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.

Igor Sieleznieff (I)

Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Timone, Marseille, France.

Martin Bertrand (M)

Département de Chirurgie Digestive et de Cancérologie Digestive, Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau, Nimes, France.

Frédéric Marchal (F)

Département de Chirurgie Oncologique, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France.

Anne Dubois (A)

Service de Chirurgie Générale et Digestive, Hôtel Dieu, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Marc Pocard (M)

Département Médico-Chirurgical de Pathologie Digestive, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France.

Anne Rullier (A)

Service d'Anatomopathologie, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, France.

Denis Smith (D)

Service d'Oncologie médicale, Haut-Lévèque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, France.

Nora Frulio (N)

Service de Radiologie, Haut-Lévèque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, France.

Eric Frison (E)

INSERM CIC1401-EC, Bordeaux, France; CHU Bordeaux, Service d'information médicale, Bordeaux, France.

Quentin Denost (Q)

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Haut-Lévèque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH