Autoantibodies as diagnostic markers and potential drivers of inflammation in ulcerative colitis.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
06
08
2019
accepted:
21
01
2020
entrez:
13
2
2020
pubmed:
13
2
2020
medline:
1
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To date, no comprehensive analysis of autoantibodies in sera of patients with ulcerative colitis has been conducted. To analyze the spectrum of autoantibodies and to elucidate their role serum-IgG from UC patients (n = 49) and non-UC donors (n = 23) were screened by using a human protein microarray. Screening yielded a remarkable number of 697 differentially-reactive at the nominal 0·01 significance level (FDR<0·1) of the univariate test between the UC and the non-UC group. CD99 emerged as a biomarker to discriminate between both groups (p = 1e-04, AUC = 0·8). In addition, cytokines, chemokines and growth factors were analyzed by Olink's Proseek® Multiplex Inflammation-I 96×96 immuno-qPCR assay and 31 genes were significant at the nominal 0.05 level of the univariate test to discriminate between UC and non-UC donors. MCP-3, HGF and CXCL-9 were identified as the most significant markers to discriminate between UC patients with clinically active and inactive disease. Levels of CXCL10 (cor = 0.3; p = 0.02), CCL25 (cor = 0.25; p = 0.04) and CCL28 (cor = 0.3; p = 0.02) correlated positively with levels of anti CD99. To assess whether autoantibodies are detectable prior to diagnosis with UC, sera from nine donors at two different time points (T-early, median 21 months and T-late, median 6 months) were analyzed. 1201 features were identified with higher reactivity in samples at time points closer to clinical UC presentation. In vitro, additional challenge of peripheral mononuclear cells with CD99 did not activate CD4+ T cells but induced the secretion of IL-10 (-CD99: 20.21±20.25; +CD99: 130.20±89.55; mean ±sd; p = 0.015). To examine the effect of CD99 in vivo, inflammation and autoantibody levels were examined in NOD/ScidIL2Rγnull mice reconstituted with PBMC from UC donors (NSG-UC). Additional challenge with CD99 aggravated disease symptoms and pathological phenotype as indicated by the elevated clinical score (-CD99: 1·85 ± 1·94; +CD99: 4·25 ± 1·48) and histological score (-CD99: 2·16 ± 0·83; +CD99: 3·15 ± 1·16, p = 0·01). Furthermore, levels of anti-CD99 antibodies increased (Control: 398 ± 323; mean MFI ± sd; Ethanol + PBS: 358 ±316; Ethanol + CD99: 1363 ± 1336; Control versus Ethanol + CD99: p = 0.03). In a highly inflammatory environment, frequencies of pro-inflammatory M1 monocytes (CD14+ CD64+: unchallenged 8.09±4.72; challenged 14.2±8.62; p = 0.07; CD14+ CD1a+: unchallenged 16.29 ±6.97; challenged 43.81±14.4, p = 0.0003) increased and levels of autoantibodies in serum decreased in the NSG-UC mouse model. These results suggest that autoantibodies are potent biomarkers to discriminate between UC and non-UC and indicate risk to develop UC. In an inflammatory environment, auto-antibodies may promote the pathological phenotype by activating M1 monocytes in the NSG-UC animal model and also in patients with UC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32050001
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228615
pii: PONE-D-19-22142
pmc: PMC7015398
doi:
Substances chimiques
Autoantibodies
0
Biomarkers
0
Cytokines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0228615Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors Andreas Weinhäusel, Regina Soldo, Lisa Milchram and Gabriel Beikircher are employees of the Austrian Institute of Technology (AIT). The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors [L.M., R.S., G.B., A.W.], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Dis Model Mech. 2016 Sep 1;9(9):985-97
pubmed: 27491073
Int J Mol Med. 2013 Apr;31(4):989-97
pubmed: 23446770
Microarrays (Basel). 2015 Apr 02;4(2):162-87
pubmed: 27600218
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010 Feb;10(2):265-72
pubmed: 20034363
J Immunol. 2011 Jun 15;186(12):7232-42
pubmed: 21576506
Nat Genet. 2010 Apr;42(4):332-7
pubmed: 20228799
Dis Model Mech. 2018 Nov 21;11(11):
pubmed: 30322872
Nat Protoc. 2007;2(10):2307-11
pubmed: 17947970
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012 Jul;18(7):1340-55
pubmed: 22069240
Front Immunol. 2018 Nov 30;9:2814
pubmed: 30555482
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013 Feb;19(2):240-5
pubmed: 23348120
Clin Chim Acta. 2013 Sep 23;424:267-73
pubmed: 23806819
Haematologica. 2016 Apr;101(4):417-26
pubmed: 26611474
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013 Jan;19(1):115-23
pubmed: 22550014
Gut. 1998 Jul;43(1):29-32
pubmed: 9771402
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018 May 17;:
pubmed: 29788291
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019 Nov 29;:
pubmed: 31782956
J Immunol. 2009 Aug 15;183(4):2827-36
pubmed: 19635903
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 May 7;20(17):4873-82
pubmed: 24803798
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jan;13(1):13-27
pubmed: 26627550
J Immunol Methods. 2015 Mar;418:39-51
pubmed: 25675867
Clin Exp Immunol. 2014 Nov;178(2):201-11
pubmed: 24981014
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 03;10(6):e0128235
pubmed: 26039628
Clin Exp Immunol. 2000 Sep;121(3):466-71
pubmed: 10971512
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2007;144(4):305-14
pubmed: 17652941
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012 Oct;55(4):429-35
pubmed: 22465933
J Exp Med. 2005 Nov 7;202(9):1213-23
pubmed: 16275760
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Feb;50(2):380-6
pubmed: 14872479
Eur J Immunol. 1996 Jun;26(6):1297-301
pubmed: 8647208
Annu Rev Immunol. 2010;28:573-621
pubmed: 20192811
J Transl Med. 2016 Nov 3;14(1):310
pubmed: 27809916
J Immunol. 2009 Aug 15;183(4):2349-55
pubmed: 19635920
J Transl Med. 2017 Dec 28;15(1):265
pubmed: 29282132
J Immunol. 2013 Feb 1;190(3):904-12
pubmed: 23275605
Nat Immunol. 2017 Jan;18(1):104-113
pubmed: 27820809
Nat Genet. 2008 Nov;40(11):1319-23
pubmed: 18836448
J Immunol. 1995 Sep 15;155(6):3161-7
pubmed: 7673729
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 24;10(6):e0128373
pubmed: 26107957
Proteomics. 2016 Apr;16(8):1204-14
pubmed: 27089054
Lancet. 2001 Nov 24;358(9295):1749-53
pubmed: 11734230