Specific cognitive correlates of the quality of life of extremely preterm school-aged children without major neurodevelopmental disability.
Age Factors
Body Image
Child
Child Behavior Disorders
Cognition
/ physiology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Developmental Disabilities
/ physiopathology
Executive Function
Female
Gestational Age
Humans
Infant, Extremely Premature
Infant, Newborn
Linear Models
Male
Parents
Psychometrics
Quality of Life
Surveys and Questionnaires
Journal
Pediatric research
ISSN: 1530-0447
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0100714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
26
07
2019
accepted:
24
01
2020
revised:
09
01
2020
pubmed:
13
2
2020
medline:
24
8
2021
entrez:
13
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We examined how specific cognitive behavioral impairments impacted quality of life (QoL) within a large multicenter cohort of 7-10 year olds surviving extremely preterm (EPT) without major neurodevelopmental disability. Between 7 and 10 years of age, two generic, self-proxy, and parental evaluations were obtained. QoL measurement questionnaires (Kidscreen-10/VSPA (Vécu et Santé Perçue de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent)) were used and compared to a reference population. The general and specific cognitive functions, such as executive functions, behavior and anxiety, and clinical neurologic examination, were also assessed. We analyzed 211 school-aged EPT children. The mean gestational age was 26.2 (±0.8) weeks, birth weight was 879 g (±181) and the mean age was 8.4 years (±0.87). Children with a Full-Scale Index Quotient ≥89, who were considered as normal, had a lower QoL. Specific cognitive impairments: comprehensive language delay, visuo-spatial integration defect, and dysexecutive disorders) were the QoL correlates in the domains of school performance and body image. School and health care professionals need to increase their focus on EPT children's lower so as to recognize the preterm behavioral/cognitive phenotype and their potential need for supportive measures. Research on preventive interventions is warranted to investigate if these long-term effects of an EPT birth can be attenuated in neonatal period and after.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
We examined how specific cognitive behavioral impairments impacted quality of life (QoL) within a large multicenter cohort of 7-10 year olds surviving extremely preterm (EPT) without major neurodevelopmental disability.
METHODS
Between 7 and 10 years of age, two generic, self-proxy, and parental evaluations were obtained. QoL measurement questionnaires (Kidscreen-10/VSPA (Vécu et Santé Perçue de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent)) were used and compared to a reference population. The general and specific cognitive functions, such as executive functions, behavior and anxiety, and clinical neurologic examination, were also assessed.
RESULTS
We analyzed 211 school-aged EPT children. The mean gestational age was 26.2 (±0.8) weeks, birth weight was 879 g (±181) and the mean age was 8.4 years (±0.87). Children with a Full-Scale Index Quotient ≥89, who were considered as normal, had a lower QoL. Specific cognitive impairments: comprehensive language delay, visuo-spatial integration defect, and dysexecutive disorders) were the QoL correlates in the domains of school performance and body image.
CONCLUSIONS
School and health care professionals need to increase their focus on EPT children's lower so as to recognize the preterm behavioral/cognitive phenotype and their potential need for supportive measures. Research on preventive interventions is warranted to investigate if these long-term effects of an EPT birth can be attenuated in neonatal period and after.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32050254
doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-0795-8
pii: 10.1038/s41390-020-0795-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
642-652Investigateurs
M C Lemarchand
(MC)
N Mestre
(N)
M Rebattel
(M)
J C Rozé
(JC)
C Coudronnières
(C)
G Menard
(G)
M Pache
(M)
C Morando
(C)
M A Einaudi
(MA)
Références
Torchin, H. & Ancel, P. Y. Epidemiology and risk factors of preterm birth. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. 45, 1213–1230 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.09.013
Serenius, F. et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely preterm infants 6.5 years after active perinatal care in Sweden. JAMA Pediatr. 170, 954–963 (2016).
doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1210
Anderson, P. J. Neuropsychological outcomes of children born very preterm. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 19, 90–96 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2013.11.012
Eryigit-Madzwamuse, S. et al. Personality of adults who were born very preterm. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 100, F524–F529 (2015).
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-308007
Vieira, M. E. & Linhares, M. B. Quality of life of individuals born preterm: a systematic review of assessment approaches. Qual. Life Res. 25, 2123–2139 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1259-9
Berbis, J. et al. Quality of life of early school-age French children born preterm: a cohort study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 162, 38–44 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.02.006
Wolke, D. et al. Self and parent perspectives on health-related quality of life of adolescents born very preterm. J. Pediatr. 163, 1020–1026.e2 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.04.030
Hack, M. Survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 45(Suppl. 3), S141–S142 (2007).
doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000302959.55428.05
Gire, C. et al. Quality of life of extremely preterm school-age children without major handicap: a cross-sectional observational study. Arch. Dis. Child 104, 333–339 (2019).
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315046
Roberts, G. Quality of life after extremely preterm birth. Arch. Dis. Child 104, 311–312 (2019).
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315708
Hadders-Algra, M. et al. The assessment of minor neurological dysfunction in infancy using the Touwen Infant Neurological Examination: strengths and limitations. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 52, 87–92 (2010).
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03305.x
Canivez, G. L. Construct validity of the WISC-IV with a referred sample: direct versus indirect hierarchical structures. Sch. Psychol. Q 29, 38–51 (2014).
doi: 10.1037/spq0000032
Senese, V. P., De Lucia, N. & Conson, M. Cognitive predictors of copying and drawing from memory of the Rey–Osterrieth complex figure in 7- to 10-year-old children. Clin. Neuropsychol. 29, 118–132 (2015).
doi: 10.1080/13854046.2014.995711
Korkman, M., Kemp, S. L. & Kirk, U. Effects of age on neurocognitive measures of children ages 5 to 12: a cross-sectional study on 800 children from the United States. Dev. Neuropsychol. 20, 331–354 (2001).
doi: 10.1207/S15326942DN2001_2
Ravens-Sieberer, U. et al. The KIDSCREEN-52 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European countries. Value Health 11, 645–658 (2008).
doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00291.x
Goodman, R. & Scott, S. Comparing the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and the Child Behavior Checklist: is small beautiful? J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 27, 17–24 (1999).
doi: 10.1023/A:1022658222914
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L. & Lushene R. E. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI (Form Y) (Consulting Psychologists Press, 1983).
Sapin, C. et al. Reliability and validity of the VSP-A, a health-related quality of life instrument for ill and healthy adolescents. J. Adolesc. Health 36, 327–336 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.01.016
Berra, S. et al. Methods and representativeness of a European survey in children and adolescents: the KIDSCREEN study. BMC Public Health 7, 182 (2007).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-182
Farooqi, A., Adamsson, M., Serenius, F. & Hägglöf, B. Executive functioning and learning skills of adolescent children born at fewer than 26 weeks of gestation. PLoS ONE 11, e0151819 (2016).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151819
Hasin, D. et al. Substance use disorders: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) and International Classification of Diseases, tenth edition (ICD-10). Addiction 101(Suppl. 1), 59–75 (2006).
doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01584.x
von Rueden, U. et al. Socioeconomic determinants of health related quality of life in childhood and adolescence: results from a European study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 60, 130–135 (2006).
doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.039792
Lowe, J. R. et al. Behavioral problems are associated with cognitive and language scores in toddlers born extremely preterm. Early Hum. Dev. 128, 48–54 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.11.007
Karande, S. & Bhosrekar, K. Impact of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder on health-related quality-of-l ife of specific learning disability children. Indian J. Pediatr. 76, 1119–1124 (2009).
doi: 10.1007/s12098-009-0240-9
Kilbride, H. W. et al. Prognostic neurodevelopmental testing of preterm infants: do we need to change the paradigm? J. Perinatol. 37, 475–479 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.12
Heeren, T. et al. Cognitive functioning at the age of 10 years among children born extremely preterm: a latent profile approach. Pediatr. Res. 82, 614–619 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/pr.2017.82
Korzeniewski, S. J. et al. Social responsiveness scale assessment of the preterm behavioral phenotype in 10-year-olds born extremely preterm. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 38, 697–705 (2017).
doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000485
The WHOQOL Group. Development of the WHOQOL: rationale and current status. Int. J. Ment. Health 23, 24–56 (1994).
doi: 10.1080/00207411.1994.11449286
Ritchie, K., Bora, S. & Woodward, L. J. Social development of children born very preterm: a systematic review. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 57, 899–918 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12783
de Kieviet, J. F. et al. Brain development of very preterm and very low-birthweight children in childhood and adolescence: a meta-analysis. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 54, 313–323 (2012).
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04216.x
Bolk, J. et al. Visual–motor integration and fine motor skills at 6½ years of age and associations with neonatal brain volumes in children born extremely preterm in Sweden: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open 8, e020478 (2018).
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020478
Wolfe, K. R. et al. Executive functions, social information processing, and social adjustment in young children born with very low birth weight. Child Neuropsychol. 21, 41–54 (2015).
doi: 10.1080/09297049.2013.866217
Bilgin, A. & Wolke, D. Maternal sensitivity in parenting preterm children: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 136, e177–e193 (2015).
doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3570
Huhtala, M. et al. Parental psychological well-being and behavioral outcome of very low birth weight infants at 3 years. Pediatrics 129, e937–e944 (2012).
doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2411
Pyhälä, R. et al. Self-reported mental health problems among adults born preterm: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 139, e20162690 (2017).
doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2690
van der Pal-de Bruin, K. M. et al. Profiling the preterm or VLBW born adolescent; implications of the Dutch POPS cohort follow-up studies. Early Hum. Dev. 91, 97–102 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.12.007
Church, P. T. et al. Academic challenges for the preterm infant: parent and educators’ perspectives. Early Hum. Dev. 128, 1–5 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.09.016
Shepherd, E. et al. Neonatal interventions for preventing cerebral palsy: an overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 6, CD012409 (2018).
pubmed: 29926474
Nguyen, T. N. et al. Developmental trajectory of language from 2 to 13 years in children born very preterm. Pediatrics 141, e20172831 (2018).
doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-2831