Patient data-sharing for immigration enforcement: a qualitative study of healthcare providers in England.
Adult
Aged
Attitude of Health Personnel
Confidentiality
/ ethics
Emigration and Immigration
/ statistics & numerical data
England
Female
Health Services Accessibility
/ ethics
Humans
Information Dissemination
/ ethics
Interviews as Topic
Male
Middle Aged
Qualitative Research
State Medicine
Transients and Migrants
/ statistics & numerical data
health policy
medical ethics
migrant health
public health
qualitative research
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 02 2020
12 02 2020
Historique:
entrez:
14
2
2020
pubmed:
14
2
2020
medline:
18
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To explore healthcare providers' perceptions and experiences of the implications of a patient data-sharing agreement between National Health Service (NHS) Digital and the Home Office on access to NHS services and quality of care received by migrant patients in England. A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews, thematic analysis and constant-comparison approach. Eleven healthcare providers and one non-clinical volunteer working in community or hospital-based settings who had experience of migrants accessing NHS England services. Interviews were carried out in 2018. England. Awareness and understanding of the patient data-sharing agreement varied among participants, who associated this with a perceived lack of transparency by the government. Participants provided insight into how they thought the data-sharing agreement was negatively influencing migrants' health-seeking behaviour, their relationship with clinicians and the safety and quality of their care. They referred to the policy as a challenge to their core ethical principles, explicitly patient confidentiality and trust, which varied depending on their clinical specialty. A perceived lack of transparency during the policy development process can result in suspicion or mistrust towards government among the health workforce, patients and public, which is underpinned by a notion of power or control. The patient data-sharing agreement was considered a threat to some of the core principles of the NHS and its implementation as adversely affecting healthcare access and patient safety. Future policy development should involve a range of stakeholders including civil society, healthcare professionals and ethicists, and include more meaningful assessments of the impact on healthcare and public health.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32051313
pii: bmjopen-2019-033202
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033202
pmc: PMC7044876
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e033202Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 205456/Z/16/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Sep 17;4:29
pubmed: 30237901
JAMA. 2017 Dec 5;318(21):2079-2080
pubmed: 29049516
BMJ. 2018 May 8;361:k2017
pubmed: 29739792
Lancet. 2013 Apr 6;381(9873):1235-45
pubmed: 23541058
Perspect Biol Med. 2015;58(4):395-418
pubmed: 27397048
BMJ Open. 2012 Aug 06;2(4):
pubmed: 22869094
J Med Ethics. 2019 Aug;45(8):497-503
pubmed: 31331951
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2018 Oct 20;:
pubmed: 30343270
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 18;18(1):30
pubmed: 29347933
Eur J Public Health. 2010 Oct;20(5):555-63
pubmed: 20040522
BMJ. 2019 Jan 10;364:l88
pubmed: 30630816
BMJ. 2018 May 17;361:k2178
pubmed: 29773571
BMJ. 2018 May 11;361:k2115
pubmed: 29752260
Int J Health Serv. 2015;45(2):320-33
pubmed: 25711730
J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Jun;38(2):384-90
pubmed: 25904814
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2006 May 04;3:3
pubmed: 16674820
Br Med Bull. 2017 Jan 1;121(1):5-18
pubmed: 28108435
BMJ. 2017 Feb 22;356:j911
pubmed: 28228374
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 May 08;5(10):589-597
pubmed: 27694650
PLoS Med. 2011 May;8(5):e1001034
pubmed: 21629681
Lancet. 2018 Dec 15;392(10164):2606-2654
pubmed: 30528486
Health Econ Policy Law. 2018 Apr;13(2):107-117
pubmed: 29306349
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2017 Jun;42(3):459-483
pubmed: 28213396
Health Policy. 2016 May;120(5):495-508
pubmed: 27080344
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 4;7(8):e015981
pubmed: 28780549
Lancet. 2019 May 25;393(10186):2168-2174
pubmed: 30981536
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Feb;12(1):17-28
pubmed: 20135189
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jul 20;7:113
pubmed: 17659074
Eur J Public Health. 2012 Apr;22(2):267-71
pubmed: 21659389
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2015 Oct 30;8:175-83
pubmed: 26586971
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Aug 21;8:48
pubmed: 17711587
J Public Health (Oxf). 2013 Dec;35(4):590-7
pubmed: 23255733
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct 12;10:285
pubmed: 20939904
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Apr;7(4):e420-e435
pubmed: 30852188
Eur J Gen Pract. 2012 Jun;18(2):100-6
pubmed: 22574692
Child Care Health Dev. 2016 Mar;42(2):220-30
pubmed: 26648588
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285