Patient data-sharing for immigration enforcement: a qualitative study of healthcare providers in England.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 02 2020
Historique:
entrez: 14 2 2020
pubmed: 14 2 2020
medline: 18 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To explore healthcare providers' perceptions and experiences of the implications of a patient data-sharing agreement between National Health Service (NHS) Digital and the Home Office on access to NHS services and quality of care received by migrant patients in England. A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews, thematic analysis and constant-comparison approach. Eleven healthcare providers and one non-clinical volunteer working in community or hospital-based settings who had experience of migrants accessing NHS England services. Interviews were carried out in 2018. England. Awareness and understanding of the patient data-sharing agreement varied among participants, who associated this with a perceived lack of transparency by the government. Participants provided insight into how they thought the data-sharing agreement was negatively influencing migrants' health-seeking behaviour, their relationship with clinicians and the safety and quality of their care. They referred to the policy as a challenge to their core ethical principles, explicitly patient confidentiality and trust, which varied depending on their clinical specialty. A perceived lack of transparency during the policy development process can result in suspicion or mistrust towards government among the health workforce, patients and public, which is underpinned by a notion of power or control. The patient data-sharing agreement was considered a threat to some of the core principles of the NHS and its implementation as adversely affecting healthcare access and patient safety. Future policy development should involve a range of stakeholders including civil society, healthcare professionals and ethicists, and include more meaningful assessments of the impact on healthcare and public health.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32051313
pii: bmjopen-2019-033202
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033202
pmc: PMC7044876
doi:

Types de publication

Evaluation Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e033202

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 205456/Z/16/Z
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Sep 17;4:29
pubmed: 30237901
JAMA. 2017 Dec 5;318(21):2079-2080
pubmed: 29049516
BMJ. 2018 May 8;361:k2017
pubmed: 29739792
Lancet. 2013 Apr 6;381(9873):1235-45
pubmed: 23541058
Perspect Biol Med. 2015;58(4):395-418
pubmed: 27397048
BMJ Open. 2012 Aug 06;2(4):
pubmed: 22869094
J Med Ethics. 2019 Aug;45(8):497-503
pubmed: 31331951
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2018 Oct 20;:
pubmed: 30343270
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 18;18(1):30
pubmed: 29347933
Eur J Public Health. 2010 Oct;20(5):555-63
pubmed: 20040522
BMJ. 2019 Jan 10;364:l88
pubmed: 30630816
BMJ. 2018 May 17;361:k2178
pubmed: 29773571
BMJ. 2018 May 11;361:k2115
pubmed: 29752260
Int J Health Serv. 2015;45(2):320-33
pubmed: 25711730
J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Jun;38(2):384-90
pubmed: 25904814
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2006 May 04;3:3
pubmed: 16674820
Br Med Bull. 2017 Jan 1;121(1):5-18
pubmed: 28108435
BMJ. 2017 Feb 22;356:j911
pubmed: 28228374
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 May 08;5(10):589-597
pubmed: 27694650
PLoS Med. 2011 May;8(5):e1001034
pubmed: 21629681
Lancet. 2018 Dec 15;392(10164):2606-2654
pubmed: 30528486
Health Econ Policy Law. 2018 Apr;13(2):107-117
pubmed: 29306349
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2017 Jun;42(3):459-483
pubmed: 28213396
Health Policy. 2016 May;120(5):495-508
pubmed: 27080344
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 4;7(8):e015981
pubmed: 28780549
Lancet. 2019 May 25;393(10186):2168-2174
pubmed: 30981536
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Feb;12(1):17-28
pubmed: 20135189
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jul 20;7:113
pubmed: 17659074
Eur J Public Health. 2012 Apr;22(2):267-71
pubmed: 21659389
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2015 Oct 30;8:175-83
pubmed: 26586971
BMC Fam Pract. 2007 Aug 21;8:48
pubmed: 17711587
J Public Health (Oxf). 2013 Dec;35(4):590-7
pubmed: 23255733
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct 12;10:285
pubmed: 20939904
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Apr;7(4):e420-e435
pubmed: 30852188
Eur J Gen Pract. 2012 Jun;18(2):100-6
pubmed: 22574692
Child Care Health Dev. 2016 Mar;42(2):220-30
pubmed: 26648588
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285

Auteurs

Vasiliki Papageorgiou (V)

Patient Experience Research Centre, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK vasiliki.papageorgiou17@imperial.ac.uk.

Alexandra Wharton-Smith (A)

Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK.
Migration Health, Health Improvement Directorate, Public Health England, London, UK.

Ines Campos-Matos (I)

Migration Health, Health Improvement Directorate, Public Health England, London, UK.
Collaborative Centre for Inclusion Health, University College London Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, London, UK.

Helen Ward (H)

Patient Experience Research Centre, Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH