Assessment of bilateral motor skills and visuospatial attention in children with perinatal stroke using a robotic object hitting task.
Bilateral motor control
Cerebral palsy
Perinatal stroke
Robotics
Visuospatial attention
Journal
Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1743-0003
Titre abrégé: J Neuroeng Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101232233
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 02 2020
13 02 2020
Historique:
received:
21
06
2019
accepted:
30
01
2020
entrez:
15
2
2020
pubmed:
15
2
2020
medline:
11
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
While motor deficits are the hallmark of hemiparetic cerebral palsy, children may also experience impairments in visuospatial attention that interfere with participation in complex activities, including sports or driving. In this study, we used a robotic object hitting task to assess bilateral sensorimotor control and visuospatial skills in children with hemiparesis due to perinatal arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) or periventricular venous infarct (PVI). We hypothesized that performance would be impaired bilaterally and be related to motor behavior and clinical assessment of visuospatial attention. Forty-nine children with perinatal stroke and hemiparetic cerebral palsy and 155 typically developing (TD) children participated in the study. Participants performed a bilateral object hitting task using the KINARM Exoskeleton Robot, in which they used virtual paddles at their fingertips to hit balls that fell from the top of the screen with increasing speed and frequency over 2.3 min. We quantified performance across 13 parameters including number of balls hit with each hand, movement speed and area, biases between hands, and spatial biases. We determined normative ranges of performance accounting for age by fitting 95% prediction bands to the TD children. We compared parameters between TD, AIS, and PVI groups using ANCOVAs accounting for age effects. Lastly, we performed regression analysis between robotic and clinical measures. The majority of children with perinatal stroke hit fewer balls with their affected arm compared to their typically developing peers. We also found deficits with the ipsilesional ("unaffected") arm. Children with AIS had greater impairments than PVI. Despite hitting fewer balls, we only identified 18% of children as impaired in hand speed or movement area. Performance on the Behavioral Inattention Test accounted for 21-32% of the variance in number of balls hit with the unaffected hand. Children with perinatal stroke-induced hemiparetic cerebral palsy may have complex bilateral deficits reflecting a combination of impairments in motor skill and visuospatial attention. Clinical assessments and interventions should address the interplay between motor and visuospatial skills.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
While motor deficits are the hallmark of hemiparetic cerebral palsy, children may also experience impairments in visuospatial attention that interfere with participation in complex activities, including sports or driving. In this study, we used a robotic object hitting task to assess bilateral sensorimotor control and visuospatial skills in children with hemiparesis due to perinatal arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) or periventricular venous infarct (PVI). We hypothesized that performance would be impaired bilaterally and be related to motor behavior and clinical assessment of visuospatial attention.
METHODS
Forty-nine children with perinatal stroke and hemiparetic cerebral palsy and 155 typically developing (TD) children participated in the study. Participants performed a bilateral object hitting task using the KINARM Exoskeleton Robot, in which they used virtual paddles at their fingertips to hit balls that fell from the top of the screen with increasing speed and frequency over 2.3 min. We quantified performance across 13 parameters including number of balls hit with each hand, movement speed and area, biases between hands, and spatial biases. We determined normative ranges of performance accounting for age by fitting 95% prediction bands to the TD children. We compared parameters between TD, AIS, and PVI groups using ANCOVAs accounting for age effects. Lastly, we performed regression analysis between robotic and clinical measures.
RESULTS
The majority of children with perinatal stroke hit fewer balls with their affected arm compared to their typically developing peers. We also found deficits with the ipsilesional ("unaffected") arm. Children with AIS had greater impairments than PVI. Despite hitting fewer balls, we only identified 18% of children as impaired in hand speed or movement area. Performance on the Behavioral Inattention Test accounted for 21-32% of the variance in number of balls hit with the unaffected hand.
CONCLUSIONS
Children with perinatal stroke-induced hemiparetic cerebral palsy may have complex bilateral deficits reflecting a combination of impairments in motor skill and visuospatial attention. Clinical assessments and interventions should address the interplay between motor and visuospatial skills.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32054511
doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-0654-1
pii: 10.1186/s12984-020-0654-1
pmc: PMC7020362
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
18Références
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Oct-Nov;31(10-11):965-976
pubmed: 29130382
Pediatrics. 2011 Dec;128(6):e1402-10
pubmed: 22123886
Res Dev Disabil. 2018 Sep;80:64-73
pubmed: 29940386
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Sep;61(9):1080-1086
pubmed: 30775778
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Feb 15;14(1):13
pubmed: 28202036
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Jul-Aug;24(6):528-41
pubmed: 20233965
Neuropediatrics. 2017 Apr;48(2):66-71
pubmed: 28282668
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(12):2296-307
pubmed: 16797611
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006 Sep;48(9):780-3
pubmed: 16904028
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Apr 02;11:47
pubmed: 24693877
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018 Apr;60(4):374-381
pubmed: 29383702
Exp Brain Res. 2008 May;187(1):107-16
pubmed: 18231781
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 06;8:2064
pubmed: 29270138
Pediatr Neurol. 2006 Sep;35(3):191-6
pubmed: 16939859
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007;31(8):1150-6
pubmed: 17624432
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Aug 10;6:230
pubmed: 22907997
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010 Mar;14(2):169-77
pubmed: 19272822
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Aug 17;15(1):77
pubmed: 30115093
Neural Plast. 2018 Dec 17;2018:1435808
pubmed: 30647728
Pediatr Phys Ther. 2010 Summer;22(2):222-33
pubmed: 20473109
Gait Posture. 2009 Nov;30(4):395-404
pubmed: 19679479
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Mar 1;171(3):230-238
pubmed: 28114647
Percept Mot Skills. 1998 Apr;86(2):539-50
pubmed: 9638752
Brain Cogn. 2012 Jul;79(2):107-16
pubmed: 22475578
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011;34:569-99
pubmed: 21692662
J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Mar;38(3):435-46.e1
pubmed: 23428186
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Jan;28(1):13-23
pubmed: 24009182
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Jan;28(1):24-35
pubmed: 23911972
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Aug;38(4):891-901
pubmed: 22390297
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 04;6:110
pubmed: 22586384
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994 Feb;16(1):84-92
pubmed: 8150892
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014 Jun;56(6):509-10
pubmed: 24387736
Am J Occup Ther. 1995 Jun;49(6):507-16
pubmed: 7645663
Pediatr Neurol. 2002 Nov;27(5):356-62
pubmed: 12504203
J Child Neurol. 2000 Sep;15(9):581-7
pubmed: 11019788
Ann Neurol. 2004 Dec;56(6):854-63
pubmed: 15562409
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1990;13:25-42
pubmed: 2183676
Pediatrics. 2009 Jun;123(6):e1111-22
pubmed: 19451190
Child Dev. 1988 Aug;59(4):908-17
pubmed: 3168629
Res Dev Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;33(3):971-81
pubmed: 22306233
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Jul;81(7):895-900
pubmed: 10896001
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Sep;30(8):762-72
pubmed: 26747126