Big data and the eyeSmart electronic medical record system - An 8-year experience from a three-tier eye care network in India.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Child
Child, Preschool
Electronic Health Records
/ statistics & numerical data
Eye Diseases
/ epidemiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
India
/ epidemiology
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Middle Aged
Morbidity
/ trends
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Visual Acuity
Young Adult
Analytics
big data
electronic medical records
ocular diseases
Journal
Indian journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1998-3689
Titre abrégé: Indian J Ophthalmol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0405376
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2020
03 2020
Historique:
entrez:
15
2
2020
pubmed:
15
2
2020
medline:
24
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the demographic details and distribution of ocular disorders in patients presenting to a three-tier eye care network in India using electronic medical record (EMR) systems across an 8-year period using big data analytics. An 8-year retrospective review of all the patients who presented across the three-tier eye care network of L.V. Prasad Eye Institute was performed from August 2010 to August 2018. Data were retrieved using an in-house eyeSmart EMR system. The demographic details and clinical presentation and ocular disease profile of all the patients were analyzed in detail. In an 8-year period, a total of 2,270,584 patients were captured on the EMR system with 4,730,221 consultations. More than half of the patients presented at tertiary centers (n = 1,174,643, 51.73%), a quarter at the secondary centers (n = 564,251, 24.85%) followed by the vision centers (n = 531,690, 23.42%). The ratio of males and females was 1.18:1. Most common states of presentation were Andhra Pradesh (n = 1,103,733, 48.61%) and Telangana (n = 661,969, 29.15%). In total, 3,721,051 ocular diagnosis instances were documented in the patients. Most common ocular disorders were related to cornea and anterior segment (n = 1,347,754, 36.22%) followed by refractive error (n = 1,133,078, 30.45%). This study depicts the demographic details and distribution of various ocular disorders in a very large cohort of patients. There is a need to adopt digitization in geographies that cater to large populations to enable insightful research. The implementation of EMR systems enables structured data for research purposes and the development of real-time analytics for the same.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32056994
pii: IndianJOphthalmol_2020_68_3_427_278371
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_710_19
pmc: PMC7043185
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
427-432Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None
Références
Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 Dec;83(12):1396-9
pubmed: 19046561
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jul/Aug;35(4):354-356
pubmed: 30407992
J Biomed Inform. 2011 Dec;44(6):958-67
pubmed: 21846508
Medizinhist J. 2010;45(3-4):293-340
pubmed: 21328920
J Clin Med. 2018 Jul 27;7(8):
pubmed: 30060447
Kidney Int. 2006 Jun;69(12):2113-4
pubmed: 16761021
Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):207-210
pubmed: 30157525
Curr Diab Rep. 2014 Apr;14(4):479
pubmed: 24615333
Ann Intern Med. 1991 May 15;114(10):902-7
pubmed: 2014953
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 5;8(9):e023090
pubmed: 30185579
Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):742-52
pubmed: 16702590
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 30;8(6):e020926
pubmed: 29961021
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Jun 19;11:169-175
pubmed: 29988772
Ocul Surf. 2019 Apr;17(2):250-256
pubmed: 30802671
BMC Dermatol. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):4
pubmed: 29954363
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Sep 04;5(1):17
pubmed: 29881737