Efficacy and safety of everolimus plus exemestane in patients with HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer progressing on/after prior endocrine therapy in routine clinical practice: Primary results from the non-interventional study, STEPAUT.
Aged
Androstadienes
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Aromatase Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Austria
/ epidemiology
Breast Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Everolimus
/ therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Postmenopause
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Progression-Free Survival
Receptor, ErbB-2
/ metabolism
Receptors, Estrogen
/ metabolism
Receptors, Progesterone
/ metabolism
Everolimus
Hormone receptor-positive
Metastatic breast cancer
Non-interventional study
Real-world setting
STEPAUT
Journal
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)
ISSN: 1532-3080
Titre abrégé: Breast
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9213011
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
12
07
2019
revised:
22
01
2020
accepted:
23
01
2020
pubmed:
18
2
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
17
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
STEPAUT, an Austrian non-interventional study, evaluated the safety and efficacy of everolimus plus exemestane in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) recurring/progressing on/after nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAIs) in routine clinical practice. Postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC progressing on/after NSAIs receiving everolimus plus exemestane in accordance with routine practice and the current version of Summary of Product Characteristics were eligible. Planned individual observation period corresponded to the duration of treatment until formal study end. Overall, 236 patients (median age: 65 years) were enrolled at 17 sites across Austria. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) in the overall population was 9.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.6-10.7 months). The mPFS (95% CI) in patients who received everolimus 10 and 5 mg was 9.9 months (7.3-11.5 months) and 8 months (4.7-10.7 months), respectively. The median time to progression was numerically longer in patients who had a therapy break (11.9 months, 95% CI: 10.0-14.6 months) versus those who did not have any therapy break (10.7 months, 95% CI: 8.9-12.6 months). Patients experienced grade 1 (53.7%), grade 2 (35.9%), grade 3 (9.9%), grade 4 (0.2%) adverse events (AEs). The most common AEs of any grade were stomatitis, mucositis (53.8%), rash, exanthema (29.7%), loss of appetite, nausea (28.4%). Real-world safety and efficacy data from STEPAUT were consistent with results from BOLERO-2, supporting everolimus plus exemestane as a suitable treatment option for HR+, HER2- ABC recurring/progressing on/after NSAIs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
STEPAUT, an Austrian non-interventional study, evaluated the safety and efficacy of everolimus plus exemestane in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) recurring/progressing on/after nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAIs) in routine clinical practice.
METHODS
METHODS
Postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC progressing on/after NSAIs receiving everolimus plus exemestane in accordance with routine practice and the current version of Summary of Product Characteristics were eligible. Planned individual observation period corresponded to the duration of treatment until formal study end.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, 236 patients (median age: 65 years) were enrolled at 17 sites across Austria. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) in the overall population was 9.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.6-10.7 months). The mPFS (95% CI) in patients who received everolimus 10 and 5 mg was 9.9 months (7.3-11.5 months) and 8 months (4.7-10.7 months), respectively. The median time to progression was numerically longer in patients who had a therapy break (11.9 months, 95% CI: 10.0-14.6 months) versus those who did not have any therapy break (10.7 months, 95% CI: 8.9-12.6 months). Patients experienced grade 1 (53.7%), grade 2 (35.9%), grade 3 (9.9%), grade 4 (0.2%) adverse events (AEs). The most common AEs of any grade were stomatitis, mucositis (53.8%), rash, exanthema (29.7%), loss of appetite, nausea (28.4%).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Real-world safety and efficacy data from STEPAUT were consistent with results from BOLERO-2, supporting everolimus plus exemestane as a suitable treatment option for HR+, HER2- ABC recurring/progressing on/after NSAIs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32062536
pii: S0960-9776(20)30036-9
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.01.035
pmc: PMC7375626
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Androstadienes
0
Aromatase Inhibitors
0
Receptors, Estrogen
0
Receptors, Progesterone
0
Everolimus
9HW64Q8G6G
ERBB2 protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
exemestane
NY22HMQ4BX
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
64-70Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest GS has received grants and personal fees from Novartis during the conduct of this study; DE has received personal fees and non-financial support from Pfizer and Novartis and personal fees from Roche, Celgene, and Pierre Fabre, outside the submitted work; RB has received grants and personal fees from Novartis during the conduct of the study; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Celgene, EISAI, Daiichi, Pfizer, and Roche, outside the submitted work; GP has received honoraria from Novartis, Amgen, Roche, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca, outside the conduct of this study; EP has received honoraria from Novartis during the conduct of the study; RG has received grant and personal fees from Roche, Celgene, Merck, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Amgen, AbbVie, BMS, MSD, Takeda, Merck, Sandoz, outside the conduct of this study; AL has received grants from Novartis during the conduct of the study; KH, MH, and BM report employment with Novartis Pharma GmbH during the conduct of this study; MG has received grants from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; and personal fees from Accelsiors, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Ipsen, Nano String Technologies, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche, outside the submitted work. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 16;380(20):1929-1940
pubmed: 31091374
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;103:356-387
pubmed: 30100160
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2012 Dec;12(12):1579-89
pubmed: 23253223
Breast. 2014 Oct;23(5):489-502
pubmed: 25244983
Front Oncol. 2014 Apr 14;4:64
pubmed: 24782981
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):904-916
pubmed: 28576675
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar;7(3):139-47
pubmed: 20125090
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Apr 1;16(7):1979-87
pubmed: 20332324
Adv Ther. 2013 Oct;30(10):870-84
pubmed: 24158787
Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2008 Sep;5(9):531-42
pubmed: 18607391
N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 9;366(6):520-9
pubmed: 22149876
BBA Clin. 2017 Jan 27;7:64-77
pubmed: 28194329