Comparison of two different anti-infectious approaches after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies in a 12-year period in British Hospital, Uruguay.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Amikacin
/ therapeutic use
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Bacteremia
/ etiology
Ceftazidime
/ therapeutic use
Ciprofloxacin
/ therapeutic use
Febrile Neutropenia
/ chemically induced
Female
Fever of Unknown Origin
/ prevention & control
Hematologic Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Humans
Incidence
Levofloxacin
/ therapeutic use
Male
Meropenem
/ therapeutic use
Middle Aged
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Transplantation, Autologous
Uruguay
Young Adult
Autologous
High-dose chemotherapy
Infection
Risk factors
Stem cell transplantation
Journal
Annals of hematology
ISSN: 1432-0584
Titre abrégé: Ann Hematol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9107334
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
11
07
2019
accepted:
30
01
2020
pubmed:
18
2
2020
medline:
10
4
2020
entrez:
17
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is a widely used and safe procedure to treat mostly hematologic diseases. These patients are at risk of infectious complications, which represents a major cause of morbidity and it is the second cause of mortality. This retrospective 12-year analysis of the incidence, type, and severity of infections in 266 consecutive unselected ASCT patients at our institution provides novel information addressing this issue. We included 266 ASCT procedures. Patients included in the 2006-2013 period are referred to as group 1 (ciprofloxacin prophylaxis and ceftazidime-amikacin as empirical antibiotics), and those in the 2013-2017 period are group 2 (levofloxacin prophylaxis and meropenem as empirical antibiotics). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 72% in group 1 and 86.2% in group 2 (p = 0.004). The majority of infectious episodes were associated with fever of unknown origin: 55% in group 1 and 59% in group 2. Febrile of unknown origin episodes were 82.6% in group 1 and 80% in group 2. Significant differences between both groups were found in age, hypogammaglobulinemia, and advanced disease at ASCT. No differences were found between groups regarding the most common agent documented in positive blood cultures (Gram+ were 66.6% in group 1 and 69% in group 2 (p = 0.68)). Mortality within 100 days of transplant was low, 1.87%. Regardless of the prophylactic regimen used, most patients experience febrile episodes in the ASCT setting, fever of unknown origin is the most common infection complication, and Gram+ agents are prevalent in both groups. Mortality rates were low. According to our results, ASCT is a safe procedure and there is no clear benefit in favor of levofloxacin versus ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. Both anti-infectious approaches are acceptable, yielding similar outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32062742
doi: 10.1007/s00277-020-03947-1
pii: 10.1007/s00277-020-03947-1
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ciprofloxacin
5E8K9I0O4U
Levofloxacin
6GNT3Y5LMF
Amikacin
84319SGC3C
Ceftazidime
9M416Z9QNR
Meropenem
FV9J3JU8B1
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM