Effect of a Machine Learning-Derived Early Warning System for Intraoperative Hypotension vs Standard Care on Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension During Elective Noncardiac Surgery: The HYPE Randomized Clinical Trial.
Journal
JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 03 2020
17 03 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
18
2
2020
medline:
9
10
2020
entrez:
18
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Intraoperative hypotension is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A machine learning-derived early warning system to predict hypotension shortly before it occurs has been developed and validated. To test whether the clinical application of the early warning system in combination with a hemodynamic diagnostic guidance and treatment protocol reduces intraoperative hypotension. Preliminary unblinded randomized clinical trial performed in a tertiary center in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, among adult patients scheduled for elective noncardiac surgery under general anesthesia and an indication for continuous invasive blood pressure monitoring, who were enrolled between May 2018 and March 2019. Hypotension was defined as a mean arterial pressure (MAP) below 65 mm Hg for at least 1 minute. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either the early warning system (n = 34) or standard care (n = 34), with a goal MAP of at least 65 mm Hg in both groups. The primary outcome was time-weighted average of hypotension during surgery, with a unit of measure of millimeters of mercury. This was calculated as the depth of hypotension below a MAP of 65 mm Hg (in millimeters of mercury) × time spent below a MAP of 65 mm Hg (in minutes) divided by total duration of operation (in minutes). Among 68 randomized patients, 60 (88%) completed the trial (median age, 64 [interquartile range {IQR}, 57-70] years; 26 [43%] women). The median length of surgery was 256 minutes (IQR, 213-430 minutes). The median time-weighted average of hypotension was 0.10 mm Hg (IQR, 0.01-0.43 mm Hg) in the intervention group vs 0.44 mm Hg (IQR, 0.23-0.72 mm Hg) in the control group, for a median difference of 0.38 mm Hg (95% CI, 0.14-0.43 mm Hg; P = .001). The median time of hypotension per patient was 8.0 minutes (IQR, 1.33-26.00 minutes) in the intervention group vs 32.7 minutes (IQR, 11.5-59.7 minutes) in the control group, for a median difference of 16.7 minutes (95% CI, 7.7-31.0 minutes; P < .001). In the intervention group, 0 serious adverse events resulting in death occurred vs 2 (7%) in the control group. In this single-center preliminary study of patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery, the use of a machine learning-derived early warning system compared with standard care resulted in less intraoperative hypotension. Further research with larger study populations in diverse settings is needed to understand the effect on additional patient outcomes and to fully assess safety and generalizability. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03376347.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32065827
pii: 2761469
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0592
pmc: PMC7078808
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03376347']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1052-1060Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Anesthesiology. 2018 Oct;129(4):663-674
pubmed: 29894315
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015 Nov-Dec;61(3):503-9
pubmed: 26272285
JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1346-1357
pubmed: 28973220
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Oct;121(4):706-721
pubmed: 30236233
Anesthesiology. 2015 Aug;123(2):307-19
pubmed: 26083768
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Apr;35(4):273-279
pubmed: 29210843
Perioper Med (Lond). 2018 Jun 19;7:14
pubmed: 29946447
Anesth Analg. 2018 Aug;127(2):424-431
pubmed: 29916861
Anesthesiology. 2016 Jan;124(1):35-44
pubmed: 26540148
Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 Sep;79(9):978-90
pubmed: 23719658
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Nov;39(23):2347-2380
pubmed: 27820966
Br J Anaesth. 2019 May;122(5):542-551
pubmed: 30916002
Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55
pubmed: 7165009
Anesthesiology. 2017 Jan;126(1):47-65
pubmed: 27792044
Anesthesiology. 2009 Dec;111(6):1217-26
pubmed: 19934864
Br J Surg. 2019 Jan;106(2):e138-e150
pubmed: 30570764
J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Feb;34(1):71-80
pubmed: 30784008
Anesth Analg. 2020 Feb;130(2):352-359
pubmed: 30896602
Anesthesiology. 2015 Sep;123(3):515-23
pubmed: 26181335
Br J Anaesth. 2019 May;122(5):563-574
pubmed: 30916004
Trials. 2019 Oct 11;20(1):582
pubmed: 31601239
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13
pubmed: 15273542
Am J Med. 2015 May;128(5):532-8
pubmed: 25541033
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;243:107-111
pubmed: 28883181