Population pharmacokinetics and Bayesian estimators for intravenous mycophenolate mofetil in haematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.
ITSIM
Pmetrics
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
mycophenolic acid
population pharmacokinetics modelling
Journal
British journal of clinical pharmacology
ISSN: 1365-2125
Titre abrégé: Br J Clin Pharmacol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7503323
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
10
04
2019
revised:
12
11
2019
accepted:
11
12
2019
pubmed:
20
2
2020
medline:
3
7
2021
entrez:
20
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Intravenous mycophenolate mofetil (IV MMF), a prodrug of mycophenolic acid (MPA), is used during nonmyeloablative and reduced-intensity conditioning haematopoetic stem cell transplantation (HCT) to improve engraftment and reduce graft-versus-host disease. The aims of this study were to develop population pharmacokinetic models and Bayesian estimators based on limited sampling strategies to allow for individual dose adjustment of intravenous mycophenolate mofetil administered by infusion in haematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. Sixty-three MPA concentration-time profiles (median [min-max] = 6 [4-7] samples) were collected from 34 HCT recipients transplanted for 14 (1-45) days and administered IV MMF every 8 hours, concomitantly with cyclosporine. The database was split into development (75%) and validation (25%) datasets. Pharmacokinetic models characterized by a single compartment with first-order elimination, combined with two gamma distributions to describe the transformation of MMF into mycophenolic acid, were developed using in parallel nonparametric (Pmetrics) and parametric (ITSIM) approaches. The performances of the models and the derived Bayesian estimators were evaluated in the validation set. The best limited sampling strategy led to a bias (min, max), root mean square error between observed and modeled interdose areas under the curve in the validation dataset of -11.72% (-31.08%, 5.00%), 14.9% for ITSIM and -2.21% (-23.40%, 30.01%), 12.4% for Pmetrics with three samples collected at 0.33, 2 and 3 hours post dosing. Population pharmacokinetic models and Bayesian estimators for IV MMF in HCT have been developed and are now available online (https://pharmaco.chu-limoges.fr) for individual dose adjustment based on the interdose area under the curve.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32073158
doi: 10.1111/bcp.14261
pmc: PMC7373706
doi:
Substances chimiques
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Mycophenolic Acid
HU9DX48N0T
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1550-1559Informations de copyright
© 2020 The British Pharmacological Society.
Références
Transplantation. 1999 Feb 27;67(4):499-504
pubmed: 10071016
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 May;21(5):920-5
pubmed: 25687796
Am J Transplant. 2006 Jan;6(1):121-8
pubmed: 16433766
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005;44(8):837-47
pubmed: 16029068
Br J Pharmacol. 2019 Dec;176 Suppl 1:S21-S141
pubmed: 31710717
Pharmacol Res. 2011 Mar;63(3):216-24
pubmed: 21056671
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005 Jun;35(11):1089-93
pubmed: 15821769
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Feb;5(2):341-58
pubmed: 20056756
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2007;46(1):13-58
pubmed: 17201457
Ther Drug Monit. 2007 Jun;29(3):353-60
pubmed: 17529894
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017 Dec;56(12):1491-1498
pubmed: 28389935
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008 Jul;42(2):113-20
pubmed: 18362900
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006;45(4):365-83
pubmed: 16584284
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005 Jul;11(7):495-505
pubmed: 15983549
Blood. 2003 Sep 15;102(6):2021-30
pubmed: 12791654
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2017 Apr;44(2):95-111
pubmed: 27909942
Blood. 2005 Dec 15;106(13):4381-8
pubmed: 16144801
Ther Drug Monit. 2012 Aug;34(4):467-76
pubmed: 22722776
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2001;40(5):375-82
pubmed: 11432538
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004 Oct;34(7):621-5
pubmed: 15300236
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2004 Apr;10(4):246-58
pubmed: 15077223
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D1091-D1106
pubmed: 29149325
Clin Transplant. 2001 Jun;15(3):176-84
pubmed: 11389708
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2011 Apr;25(2):47-57
pubmed: 21190834
Blood. 2001 Jun 1;97(11):3390-400
pubmed: 11369628
J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Nov;52(11):1654-64
pubmed: 22174435
J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Jan;47(1):6-12
pubmed: 17192496
Transplantation. 2011 Mar 27;91(6):e36-8
pubmed: 21383599
Ther Drug Monit. 2013 Jun;35(3):322-7
pubmed: 23666572
J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Feb;45(2):219-26
pubmed: 15647415
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009;48(10):667-75
pubmed: 19743888
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1979 Sep;26(3):294-305
pubmed: 466923
Ther Drug Monit. 2006 Jun;28(3):394-401
pubmed: 16778725
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Sep;57(9):1211-1213
pubmed: 29923171
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016 May;55(5):551-93
pubmed: 26620047
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2019 Mar;58(3):389-399
pubmed: 30140975
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Aug;86(8):1550-1559
pubmed: 32073158
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Nov;78(5):486-500
pubmed: 16321615
J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 2000 Jan 28;738(1):169-73
pubmed: 10778939
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 May;21(5):926-33
pubmed: 25655791
J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Apr;53(4):393-402
pubmed: 23382105
J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Apr;36(4):315-24
pubmed: 8728345
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006 Apr;12(4):454-65
pubmed: 16545729