The experiences of people bereaved by suicide regarding the press reporting of the death: qualitative study.
Media reporting
Qualitative
Suicide bereavement
Suicide prevention
Thematic analysis
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Feb 2020
20 Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
09
04
2019
accepted:
14
01
2020
entrez:
21
2
2020
pubmed:
23
2
2020
medline:
17
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Media guidelines on suicide reporting of suicide have two purposes: to prevent further suicides, and to minimise distress to the bereaved, who are themselves at increased risk of suicide. We aimed to describe the subjective experiences of people bereaved by suicide regarding media reporting of the suicide of their friend or relative. We conducted a cross-sectional study of staff and students aged 18-40 at 37 United Kingdom higher educational institutions in 2010 to recruit adults who had experienced bereavement by the suicide of a close contact. We analysed free-text responses to a question probing experiences of the press after the suicide, using thematic analysis to identify key themes. We analysed responses from 140 eligible respondents, and identified 3 main themes: value placed on respecting the privacy or wishes of the bereaved; respect accorded to the deceased; and the role of the press in promoting suicide prevention messages. Many respondents described negative experiences of the press, with sub-themes capturing distressing experiences relating to perceptions of journalists' intrusive behaviour, failure to consult appropriately with the bereaved, journalists releasing private information, negatively misrepresenting the deceased, and breaching the anonymity of the deceased or bereaved. We identified considerable variation in people's views over acceptable levels of detail reported in the press, and in some cases objections were in relation to journalists following media guidelines. These divergent views illustrate the tensions between the twin purposes of media guidelines: to prevent further suicides, and to protect the bereaved. The findings from our British sample provide journalists with personal perspectives from bereaved relatives on the impact of media intrusion, speculation, and misrepresentation, and an insight into disparate views on the nature of information relatives feel comfortable disclosing. These findings suggest a need for journalists' training to include exposure to such views, to heighten awareness of potentially distressing effects and the nuances of bereaved people's preferences. This should aim to encourage journalists to consult with bereaved relatives more sensitively, whilst also remaining mindful of media guidelines on the reporting of suicide.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Media guidelines on suicide reporting of suicide have two purposes: to prevent further suicides, and to minimise distress to the bereaved, who are themselves at increased risk of suicide. We aimed to describe the subjective experiences of people bereaved by suicide regarding media reporting of the suicide of their friend or relative.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a cross-sectional study of staff and students aged 18-40 at 37 United Kingdom higher educational institutions in 2010 to recruit adults who had experienced bereavement by the suicide of a close contact. We analysed free-text responses to a question probing experiences of the press after the suicide, using thematic analysis to identify key themes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We analysed responses from 140 eligible respondents, and identified 3 main themes: value placed on respecting the privacy or wishes of the bereaved; respect accorded to the deceased; and the role of the press in promoting suicide prevention messages. Many respondents described negative experiences of the press, with sub-themes capturing distressing experiences relating to perceptions of journalists' intrusive behaviour, failure to consult appropriately with the bereaved, journalists releasing private information, negatively misrepresenting the deceased, and breaching the anonymity of the deceased or bereaved. We identified considerable variation in people's views over acceptable levels of detail reported in the press, and in some cases objections were in relation to journalists following media guidelines. These divergent views illustrate the tensions between the twin purposes of media guidelines: to prevent further suicides, and to protect the bereaved.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The findings from our British sample provide journalists with personal perspectives from bereaved relatives on the impact of media intrusion, speculation, and misrepresentation, and an insight into disparate views on the nature of information relatives feel comfortable disclosing. These findings suggest a need for journalists' training to include exposure to such views, to heighten awareness of potentially distressing effects and the nuances of bereaved people's preferences. This should aim to encourage journalists to consult with bereaved relatives more sensitively, whilst also remaining mindful of media guidelines on the reporting of suicide.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32075618
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8211-1
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-8211-1
pmc: PMC7031901
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
176Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/L501487/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Guarantors of Brain
ID : n/a
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0802441
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;60(8):797-802
pubmed: 12912763
Lancet Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;1(1):86-94
pubmed: 26360405
Crisis. 2006;27(2):82-7
pubmed: 16913330
Crisis. 2018 Sep;39(5):386-396
pubmed: 30052077
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;60(7):687-94
pubmed: 24351965
Arch Suicide Res. 2019 Jul-Sep;23(3):507-522
pubmed: 29856679
Crisis. 2015;36(1):13-20
pubmed: 25467047
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2011 Jun 03;5:15
pubmed: 21639895
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2011 Dec;41(6):585-93
pubmed: 21815914
Crisis. 2019 Jan;40(1):54-61
pubmed: 30052076
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 May 1;74(5):456-464
pubmed: 28329305
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 May;59(5):407-12
pubmed: 15831691
Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;203(3):228-32
pubmed: 23391729
Crisis. 2000;21(2):71-9
pubmed: 11019482
CMAJ. 2018 Jul 30;190(30):E900-E907
pubmed: 30061324
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 05;15(3):
pubmed: 29510591
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 26;6(1):e009948
pubmed: 26813968
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;64(6):536-544
pubmed: 29972096
BJPsych Bull. 2017 Apr;41(2):83-86
pubmed: 28400965
Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;212(4):197-198
pubmed: 29557756
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Jan;9(1):123-38
pubmed: 22470283
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Oct;65(10):928-33
pubmed: 20889589
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2010 Oct;40(5):524-34
pubmed: 21034215
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jul;71(2):244-248
pubmed: 20398990
Crisis. 2017 Jan;38(1):17-25
pubmed: 27445013