Targeted Multidrug Resistant Organism Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Postoperative Infections in Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgical Patients.


Journal

The Pediatric infectious disease journal
ISSN: 1532-0987
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Infect Dis J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8701858

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 23 2 2020
medline: 7 4 2021
entrez: 22 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To determine if receiving targeted antimicrobial (AM) prophylaxis has an effect on the rate of postoperative infections in patient's colonized with a multidrug resistant organism (MDRO) undergoing cardiothoracic surgery (CTS). Single-center, retrospective medical record review of pediatric patients from birth to 18 years of age undergoing CTS from January 2013 to September 2018. Demographic data collected included age, specific MDRO, site of MDRO colonization, type of surgery, perioperative AM agent and type of infection. Patients were stratified into 2 groups, MDRO+ and MDRO-. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between groups with a Student's t test for continuous variables and a χ2, Fisher exact test or Mann-Whitney U test for noncontinuous variables. A 2-sided significance level of α = 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Version 24 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Fifty patients (26 males/24 females) were included in the MDRO (+) group and 295 patients (168 males/127 females) in the MDRO (-) group. The median age was 0.48 years (interquartile range 0.24-1 year) and 0.9 years (interquartile range 0.19-8 years) in the MDRO (+) and MDRO (-) groups, P = 0.003. 2 of 50 (4%) MDRO (+) patients and 15 of 295 (5.1 %) MDRO (-) patients developed an infection, P = 1. 10 of 50 (20%) MDRO (+) patients received targeted AM toward the MDRO and none developed an infection. Of the 2 MDRO (+) patients with infection, 1 was infected with the MDRO. For MDRO (+) patients, there was no difference in the rate of infection whether targeted AM therapy was received, P = 1. There was no difference in the rate of postoperative infection between MDRO (+) and MDRO (-) patients. Additionally, these preliminary pediatric data suggest targeting AM agents to a specific MDRO does not impact the rate of postoperative infection in children undergoing CTS. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
To determine if receiving targeted antimicrobial (AM) prophylaxis has an effect on the rate of postoperative infections in patient's colonized with a multidrug resistant organism (MDRO) undergoing cardiothoracic surgery (CTS).
METHODS
Single-center, retrospective medical record review of pediatric patients from birth to 18 years of age undergoing CTS from January 2013 to September 2018. Demographic data collected included age, specific MDRO, site of MDRO colonization, type of surgery, perioperative AM agent and type of infection. Patients were stratified into 2 groups, MDRO+ and MDRO-. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between groups with a Student's t test for continuous variables and a χ2, Fisher exact test or Mann-Whitney U test for noncontinuous variables. A 2-sided significance level of α = 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Version 24 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
RESULTS
Fifty patients (26 males/24 females) were included in the MDRO (+) group and 295 patients (168 males/127 females) in the MDRO (-) group. The median age was 0.48 years (interquartile range 0.24-1 year) and 0.9 years (interquartile range 0.19-8 years) in the MDRO (+) and MDRO (-) groups, P = 0.003. 2 of 50 (4%) MDRO (+) patients and 15 of 295 (5.1 %) MDRO (-) patients developed an infection, P = 1. 10 of 50 (20%) MDRO (+) patients received targeted AM toward the MDRO and none developed an infection. Of the 2 MDRO (+) patients with infection, 1 was infected with the MDRO. For MDRO (+) patients, there was no difference in the rate of infection whether targeted AM therapy was received, P = 1.
CONCLUSIONS
There was no difference in the rate of postoperative infection between MDRO (+) and MDRO (-) patients. Additionally, these preliminary pediatric data suggest targeting AM agents to a specific MDRO does not impact the rate of postoperative infection in children undergoing CTS. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32084113
doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002620
pii: 00006454-202006000-00010
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Bacterial Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

514-518

Références

Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Olsen KM, et al. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; Infectious Disease Society of America; Surgical Infection Society; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70:195–283.
Voit SB, Todd JK, Nelson B, et al. Electronic surveillance system for monitoring surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis. Pediatrics. 2005;116:1317–1322.
Gorbach SL, Condon RE, Conte JE Jr., et al. Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for surgical prophylaxis. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;15(suppl 1):S313–S338.
Källman J, Friberg O. Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery–general principles. APMIS. 2007;115:1012–1015.
Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital infection control practices advisory committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:250–78; quiz 279.
Doron S, Davidson LE. Antimicrobial stewardship. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86:1113–1123.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States. 2013. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/. Published 2018. Accessed September 2019.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion (DHQP). 2015. https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/mdro/background.html#anchor_1553112579. Accessed September 2019.
Spellberg B, Blaser M, Guidos RJ, et al. Combating antimicrobial resistance: policy recommendations to save lives. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(suppl 5):S397–S428.
Sochet AA, Cartron AM, Nyhan A, et al. Surgical site infection after pediatric cardiothoracic surgery. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2017;8:7–12.
Jaworski R, Kansy A, Dzierzanowska-Fangrat K, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in pediatric cardiac surgery: where are we and where do we go? A systematic review. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019;20:253–260.
Nateghian A, Taylor G, Robinson JL. Risk factors for surgical site infections following open-heart surgery in a Canadian pediatric population. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32:397–401.
Tortoriello TA, Friedman JD, McKenzie ED, et al. Mediastinitis after pediatric cardiac surgery: a 15-year experience at a single institution. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:1655–1660.
Filsoufi F, Castillo JG, Rahmanian PB, et al. Epidemiology of deep sternal wound infection in cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23:488–494.
Sharma M, Berriel-Cass D, Baran J Jr.. Sternal surgical-site infection following coronary artery bypass graft: prevalence, microbiology, and complications during a 42-month period. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004;25:468–471.
Walsh EE, Greene L, Kirshner R. Sustained reduction in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus wound infections after cardiothoracic surgery. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:68–73.
Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36:309–332.
Bolon MK, Morlote M, Weber SG, et al. Glycopeptides are no more effective than beta-lactam agents for prevention of surgical site infection after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:1357–1363.
Ventola CL. The antibiotic resistance crisis: part 1: causes and threats. P T. 2015;40:277–283.

Auteurs

Jeffrey J Cies (JJ)

From the Department of Pharmacy, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Critical Care Medicine, St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA.
The Center for Pediatric Pharmacotherapy LLC, Pottstown, PA.
Department of Pediatrics, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.

Christina Palladino (C)

From the Department of Pharmacy, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Critical Care Medicine, St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA.

Hera Mahmood (H)

From the Department of Pharmacy, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Critical Care Medicine, St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA.

Wayne S Moore (WS)

The Center for Pediatric Pharmacotherapy LLC, Pottstown, PA.

Arun Chopra (A)

The Center for Pediatric Pharmacotherapy LLC, Pottstown, PA.
NYU Langone Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Critical Care Medicine, New York, NY.
NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH