Phenotype-based probabilistic analysis of heterogeneous responses to cancer drugs and their combination efficacy.


Journal

PLoS computational biology
ISSN: 1553-7358
Titre abrégé: PLoS Comput Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101238922

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2020
Historique:
received: 01 10 2019
accepted: 27 01 2020
revised: 04 03 2020
pubmed: 23 2 2020
medline: 7 5 2020
entrez: 22 2 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cell-to-cell variability generates subpopulations of drug-tolerant cells that diminish the efficacy of cancer drugs. Efficacious combination therapies are thus needed to block drug-tolerant cells via minimizing the impact of heterogeneity. Probabilistic models such as Bliss independence have been developed to evaluate drug interactions and their combination efficacy based on probabilities of specific actions mediated by drugs individually and in combination. In practice, however, these models are often applied to conventional dose-response curves in which a normalized parameter with a value between zero and one, generally referred to as fraction of cells affected (fa), is used to evaluate the efficacy of drugs and their combined interactions. We use basic probability theory, computer simulations, time-lapse live cell microscopy, and single-cell analysis to show that fa metrics may bias our assessment of drug efficacy and combination effectiveness. This bias may be corrected when dynamic probabilities of drug-induced phenotypic events, i.e. induction of cell death and inhibition of division, at a single-cell level are used as metrics to assess drug efficacy. Probabilistic phenotype metrics offer the following three benefits. First, in contrast to the commonly used fa metrics, they directly represent probabilities of drug action in a cell population. Therefore, they deconvolve differential degrees of drug effect on tumor cell killing versus inhibition of cell division, which may not be correlated for many drugs. Second, they increase the sensitivity of short-term drug response assays to cell-to-cell heterogeneities and the presence of drug-tolerant subpopulations. Third, their probabilistic nature allows them to be used directly in unbiased evaluation of synergistic efficacy in drug combinations using probabilistic models such as Bliss independence. Altogether, we envision that probabilistic analysis of single-cell phenotypes complements currently available assays via improving our understanding of heterogeneity in drug response, thereby facilitating the discovery of more efficacious combination therapies to block drug-tolerant cells.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32084135
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007688
pii: PCOMPBIOL-D-19-01684
pmc: PMC7055924
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antineoplastic Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1007688

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA046592
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R00 CA194163
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM133404
Pays : United States

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Feb 6;38(1):56
pubmed: 30728057
Mol Syst Biol. 2015 Mar 26;11(3):797
pubmed: 25814555
Oncogene. 2012 Mar 1;31(9):1105-16
pubmed: 21765463
Nat Methods. 2016 Jun;13(6):497-500
pubmed: 27135974
Nat Chem Biol. 2013 Nov;9(11):669-70
pubmed: 24141220
Science. 2014 Dec 19;346(6216):1480-6
pubmed: 25394791
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Feb 1;304(3):E237-53
pubmed: 23211518
Cancer Discov. 2019 Apr;9(4):526-545
pubmed: 30709805
Nat Med. 2016 May 5;22(5):472-8
pubmed: 27149220
Cancer Cell. 2018 Feb 12;33(2):322-336.e8
pubmed: 29438700
Mol Syst Biol. 2017 Jan 9;13(1):905
pubmed: 28069687
Mol Cell. 2018 Aug 16;71(4):581-591.e5
pubmed: 30057196
Methods. 2017 Feb 15;115:80-90
pubmed: 27713081
Mol Cancer Ther. 2008 Sep;7(9):2876-83
pubmed: 18790768
Cancer Res. 2019 Jun 1;79(11):2947-2961
pubmed: 30987999
Science. 2008 Dec 5;322(5907):1511-6
pubmed: 19023046
EMBO Mol Med. 2018 May;10(5):
pubmed: 29650805
Cancer Cell. 2013 Jun 10;23(6):811-25
pubmed: 23764003
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Jul;88(1):34-8
pubmed: 20520606
Nat Methods. 2016 Jun;13(6):521-7
pubmed: 27135972
Cell. 2008 Feb 8;132(3):487-98
pubmed: 18267078
Cell. 2010 Apr 2;141(1):69-80
pubmed: 20371346
Cell. 2017 Dec 14;171(7):1678-1691.e13
pubmed: 29245013
Nat Commun. 2016 Feb 19;7:10690
pubmed: 26891683
Cell Syst. 2019 Feb 27;8(2):97-108.e16
pubmed: 30797775
PLoS Biol. 2008 Dec 2;6(12):2831-52
pubmed: 19053173
Curr Opin Syst Biol. 2018 Aug;10:1-8
pubmed: 30740553
Nat Chem Biol. 2013 Nov;9(11):708-14
pubmed: 24013279
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
Nature. 2017 Nov 9;551(7679):247-250
pubmed: 29088702
Nat Methods. 2012 Sep;9(9):923-8
pubmed: 22886092
Biochem Pharmacol. 2016 Dec 15;122:1-9
pubmed: 27349985
Cell. 2018 May 31;173(6):1413-1425.e14
pubmed: 29754815
Adv Enzyme Regul. 1984;22:27-55
pubmed: 6382953
Nat Med. 2016 Mar;22(3):232-4
pubmed: 26937615
Pharmacol Rev. 1989 Jun;41(2):93-141
pubmed: 2692037
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 1;26(22):3709-14
pubmed: 18669456
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2015 Sep 25;13:504-13
pubmed: 26949479
Cancer Cell. 2008 Aug 12;14(2):111-22
pubmed: 18656424
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 10;106(6):1826-31
pubmed: 19188593
Bacteriol Rev. 1956 Dec;20(4):243-58
pubmed: 13403845
Cell. 2018 Aug 9;174(4):843-855.e19
pubmed: 30017245
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Apr 20;8:158
pubmed: 28473769
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Oct 01;11(10):
pubmed: 31581557
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2015 Jun;3(3):e00149
pubmed: 26171228
Pharmacol Rev. 1995 Jun;47(2):331-85
pubmed: 7568331
Cancer Chemother Rep. 1972 Oct;56(5):563-71
pubmed: 4652587
Nature. 2017 Jun 15;546(7658):431-435
pubmed: 28607484
Biophys Rev. 2013 Dec;5(4):323-345
pubmed: 28510113
Cancer Cell. 2012 Apr 17;21(4):547-62
pubmed: 22516262

Auteurs

Natacha Comandante-Lou (N)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.

Mehwish Khaliq (M)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Program in Cancer Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.

Divya Venkat (D)

Department of Biochemistry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.

Mohan Manikkam (M)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.

Mohammad Fallahi-Sichani (M)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Program in Cancer Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH