Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the French version of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised (TAPES-R).
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
31
07
2019
accepted:
29
01
2020
entrez:
22
2
2020
pubmed:
23
2
2020
medline:
19
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised (TAPES-R) is a self-administered questionnaire to measure multidimensional adjustment to a prosthetic limb. Our aim was to assess the validity and reliability of the French version of the TAPES-R (TAPES-R-F). The cross-cultural adaptation was performed according to the recommendations. Factor analysis and Rasch analysis were also performed to allow comparison with the original English version. Construct validity was assessed by measuring the correlations between TAPES-R-F subscores and quality of life, pain, body image satisfaction, anxiety and depression. Internal consistency was measured with Cronbach's α. The standard error of measurement, smallest detectable change, Bland and Altman limits of agreement, and intraclass correlation were the measures of agreement and reliability. No major difficulties were encountered throughout the trans-cultural adaptation process. The final version of the TAPES-R-F was well accepted and understood by the patients. According to the factor analysis, the satisfaction scale should be treated as a one-dimensional construct when used by French-speaking people and should not be separated into two separate subscales, functional and aesthetic, as is the case in the original English version. Our study confirmed that there is a strong relationship between biopsychosocial factors and adjustment to amputation. Cronbach's α > 0.8 for all the subscales. Reliability was good to excellent for all the subscales (ICCs between 0.61 and 0.89). The smallest detectable changes were 0.7, 0.8, 1.3, 0.4, and 1.8 (general adjustment, social adjustment, adjustment to limitation, activity restriction, and global satisfaction with the prosthesis). The TAPES-R-F is a valid and reliable instrument to assess multidimensional adjustment of French-speaking lower limb amputees. This questionnaire can be used for both clinical assessment and research purposes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised (TAPES-R) is a self-administered questionnaire to measure multidimensional adjustment to a prosthetic limb. Our aim was to assess the validity and reliability of the French version of the TAPES-R (TAPES-R-F).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The cross-cultural adaptation was performed according to the recommendations. Factor analysis and Rasch analysis were also performed to allow comparison with the original English version. Construct validity was assessed by measuring the correlations between TAPES-R-F subscores and quality of life, pain, body image satisfaction, anxiety and depression. Internal consistency was measured with Cronbach's α. The standard error of measurement, smallest detectable change, Bland and Altman limits of agreement, and intraclass correlation were the measures of agreement and reliability.
RESULTS
No major difficulties were encountered throughout the trans-cultural adaptation process. The final version of the TAPES-R-F was well accepted and understood by the patients. According to the factor analysis, the satisfaction scale should be treated as a one-dimensional construct when used by French-speaking people and should not be separated into two separate subscales, functional and aesthetic, as is the case in the original English version. Our study confirmed that there is a strong relationship between biopsychosocial factors and adjustment to amputation. Cronbach's α > 0.8 for all the subscales. Reliability was good to excellent for all the subscales (ICCs between 0.61 and 0.89). The smallest detectable changes were 0.7, 0.8, 1.3, 0.4, and 1.8 (general adjustment, social adjustment, adjustment to limitation, activity restriction, and global satisfaction with the prosthesis).
CONCLUSIONS
The TAPES-R-F is a valid and reliable instrument to assess multidimensional adjustment of French-speaking lower limb amputees. This questionnaire can be used for both clinical assessment and research purposes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32084223
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229084
pii: PONE-D-19-21400
pmc: PMC7034834
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0229084Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 28;9(1):e86405
pubmed: 24489723
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(19-20):1737-45
pubmed: 21184630
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Apr;86(4):650-8
pubmed: 15827913
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Dec;46(12):1417-32
pubmed: 8263569
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91
pubmed: 11124735
Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Jul 22-Aug 5;26(14-15):837-50
pubmed: 15497913
Qual Life Res. 2014 Mar;23(2):485-93
pubmed: 23912855
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
pubmed: 1593914
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jun;89(6):487-96
pubmed: 20489393
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jan;98(1):105-113
pubmed: 27742450
Orthopade. 2006 Nov;35(11):1152, 1154-6, 1158
pubmed: 17039337
Clin Rehabil. 2012 Feb;26(2):180-91
pubmed: 21908476
Qual Life Res. 1995 Aug;4(4):293-307
pubmed: 7550178
Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2005 Jul;48(6):281-7
pubmed: 15923054
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Dec;75(12):1309-14
pubmed: 7993169
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2008 Jun;4(3):627-33
pubmed: 18830394
Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Jul 22-Aug 5;26(14-15):882-93
pubmed: 15497917
Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 1985 Feb;143(2):175-89
pubmed: 4037594
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 24;9(3):e92943
pubmed: 24663958
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1013-23
pubmed: 9817119
J Clin Psychiatry. 1983 Jul;44(7):256-8
pubmed: 6863225
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 24;13(9):e0204623
pubmed: 30248158
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jan;63(1):28-36
pubmed: 19800198
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 May;84(5):747-61
pubmed: 12736892
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Jun;33(6):720-6
pubmed: 17531912
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Feb 10;10:13
pubmed: 20144247
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
pubmed: 18839484
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Mar;86(3):205-15
pubmed: 17314705
Psychosomatics. 1987 Apr;28(4):183-9
pubmed: 3432538
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Jul;35(14):1133-42
pubmed: 23033871
Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38
pubmed: 8080219
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011 Jun;35(2):201-6
pubmed: 21697202
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42
pubmed: 17161752
Int J Rehabil Res. 2014 Mar;37(1):74-9
pubmed: 24157864
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):422-9
pubmed: 18295618
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Aug;74(8):862-70
pubmed: 8347072
J Outcome Meas. 1999;3(2):103-22
pubmed: 10204322
Injury. 2014 Dec;45(12):1859-66
pubmed: 25294119
Value Health. 2008 May-Jun;11(3):509-21
pubmed: 18179659
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Mar;99(3):452-458
pubmed: 28987901
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;85(5):730-6
pubmed: 15129396
J Prosthet Orthot. 2017 Apr;29(2):54-62
pubmed: 28983183
Clin Rehabil. 2009 Nov;23(11):1044-50
pubmed: 19717504
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Mar;42(5):730-736
pubmed: 30278793