Whole Brain Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Poor-Prognosis Patients with One to 10 Brain Metastases: A Randomised Feasibility Study.
Brain metastases
stereotactic radiosurgery
whole brain radiotherapy
Journal
Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
ISSN: 1433-2981
Titre abrégé: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9002902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
received:
29
10
2019
revised:
31
12
2019
accepted:
14
01
2020
pubmed:
23
2
2020
medline:
2
3
2021
entrez:
23
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A significant proportion of patients with brain metastases have a poor prognosis, with a life expectancy of 3-6 months. To determine the optimal radiotherapeutic strategy for brain metastases in this population, we conducted a randomised feasibility study of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) versus stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Patients with a life expectancy of 3-6 months and between one and 10 brain metastases with a diameter ≤4 cm were enrolled at six Canadian cancer centres. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either WBRT (20 Gy in five fractions) or SRS (15 Gy in one fraction). The primary end point was the rate of accrual per month. Secondary feasibility and clinical end points included the ratio of accrued subjects to screened subjects. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT02220491). In total, 210 patients were screened to enrol 22 patients into the trial; 20 patients were randomised between the two arms. Two patients did not receive treatment because one patient died and another patient withdrew consent after being enrolled. Patients were accrued between January 2015 and November 2017; the accrual rate was 0.63 patients/month. The most common reasons for exclusion were anticipated median survival outside the required range (n = 40), baseline Karnofsky Performance Score below 70 (n = 28) and more than 10 brain metastases (n = 28). The median follow-up was 7.0 months and the median survival was 7.0 months for all patients in the trial. The median intracranial progression-free survival was 1.8 months in the SRS arm and 9.2 months in the WBRT arm. There were five grade 3+ toxicities in the SRS arm and one grade 3+ toxicity in the WBRT arm; no grade 5 toxicities were observed. The cumulative rates of retreatment were 40% in the SRS arm and 40% in the WBRT arm. A randomised trial evaluating WBRT versus SRS in patients with one to 10 metastases and a poor prognosis is feasible. A slower than expected accrual rate and difficulties with accurate prognostication were identified as issues in this feasibility study. A larger phase III randomised trial is planned to determine the optimal treatment in this patient population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32085923
pii: S0936-6555(20)30041-8
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.02.001
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02220491']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
442-451Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.