Presentation, surgical intervention, and long-term survival in patients with Marfan syndrome.
Acute Disease
Adolescent
Adult
Aortic Dissection
/ diagnostic imaging
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
/ diagnostic imaging
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic
/ diagnostic imaging
Child
Child, Preschool
Chronic Disease
Female
Humans
Male
Marfan Syndrome
/ complications
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Survivors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Young Adult
Aortic dissection
Aortic surgery
Marfan
Journal
Journal of vascular surgery
ISSN: 1097-6809
Titre abrégé: J Vasc Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8407742
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
16
10
2016
accepted:
07
10
2019
pubmed:
23
2
2020
medline:
1
12
2020
entrez:
23
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) often present with acute catastrophic aortic events at a young age and have a shortened life span. This study examines the impact of presentation and demographics on late survival in patients with MFS. Adults with confirmed MFS in our thoracic aortic center dataset were identified and statistical analysis performed to identify the incidence and predictors of aortic interventions and late mortality. We identified 301 patients with a MFS initial diagnosis at age 17 years (interquartile range, 4-30 years) with presentation into our thoracic aortic center at 21 years (interquartile range, 8-34 years). The average follow-up in our center was 10 ± 10 years. Clinical features were 41% male, 86% white race, coronary artery disease 28%, hypertension 40%, peripheral vascular disease 19%, and anti-impulse agent in 51% (β-blocker, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, calcium channel blocker). Distribution of operative aortic pathology was isolated to the ascending aorta (70%) and descending aorta (8%). One hundred seventy-eight patients (59%) required primary aortic surgery (36% emergent). Primary procedures were cardiac (aortic valve/root) in nature in 94%. Seventy-four patients (42%) required multiple aortic procedures at a mean of 9.2 ± 6.9 years, involving the thoracoabdominal aorta in 65%, thoracic aorta in 37%, and abdominal aorta in 21%. Patients who required multiple aortic procedures were more likely (P < .05) to have coronary artery disease (50% vs 30%), and peripheral vascular disease (43% vs 18%). Multiple aortic procedures were also more likely (P < .05) in patients who developed de novo distal dissection (14% vs 0%), had prior dissection (47% vs 18%), or unknown MFS at the time of the initial procedure (27% vs 63%). Multivariable analysis identified prior dissection as an independent predictor of need for emergent surgery (odds ratio, 13.20; 95% confidence interval, 4.64-37.30; P < .05), as well as additional aortic surgery (odds ratio, 4.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.87-10.50; P < .05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed similar 10-year survival with or without aortic interventions (82% with vs 89% without; P = .08). Late survival was decreased in patients undergoing emergent initial procedures (66% vs 89%; P < .01), as well as those undergoing multiple operations (74% vs 86%; P = .03). These data indicate that, in the modern era, the mode of presentation and need for multiple procedures have a detrimental impact on late survival. Additionally, the presence of acute or chronic dissection predicts the need for additional aortic procedures during follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32085956
pii: S0741-5214(19)32552-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.060
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
480-489Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.