Prime-boost vaccination strategy enhances immunogenicity compared to single pneumococcal conjugate vaccination in patients receiving conventional DMARDs, to some extent in abatacept but not in rituximab-treated patients.
Abatacept
/ therapeutic use
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antirheumatic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Immunization, Secondary
/ methods
Immunocompromised Host
/ immunology
Immunogenicity, Vaccine
/ immunology
Male
Middle Aged
Pneumococcal Infections
/ prevention & control
Pneumococcal Vaccines
/ administration & dosage
Rheumatic Diseases
/ drug therapy
Rituximab
/ therapeutic use
Abatacept
Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
Rituximab
Synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
Journal
Arthritis research & therapy
ISSN: 1478-6362
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101154438
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 02 2020
22 02 2020
Historique:
received:
01
11
2019
accepted:
06
02
2020
entrez:
24
2
2020
pubmed:
24
2
2020
medline:
25
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To explore whether a prime-boost vaccination strategy, i.e., a dose of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) and a dose of 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23), enhances antibody response compared to single PCV dose in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases treated with different immunosuppressive drugs and controls. Patients receiving rituximab (n = 30), abatacept (n = 23), monotherapy with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs, methotrexate/azathioprine/mycophenolate mofetil, n = 27), and controls (n = 28) were immunized with a dose PCV followed by PPV23 after ≥ 8 weeks. Specific antibodies to 12 serotypes included in both vaccines were determined using a multiplex microsphere immunoassay in blood samples before and 4-8 weeks after each vaccination. Positive antibody response was defined as ≥ 2-fold increase from pre- to postvaccination serotype-specific IgG concentration and putative protective level as IgG ≥ 1.3 μg/mL. The number of serotypes with positive antibody response and IgG ≥ 1.3 μg/mL, respectively, after PCV and PCV + PPV23 were compared within each treatment group and to controls. Opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) assay was performed for serotypes 6B and 23F. Compared to single-dose PCV, prime-boost vaccination increased the number of serotypes with positive antibody response in patients with abatacept, cDMARDs, and controls (p = 0.02, p = 0.01, and p = 0.01), but not in patients on rituximab. After PCV + PPV23, the number of serotypes with positive antibody response was significantly lower in all treatment groups compared to controls but lowest in rituximab, followed by the abatacept and cDMARD group (p < 0.001). Compared to PCV alone, the number of serotypes with putative protective levels after PCV + PPV23 increased significantly only in patients in cDMARDs (p = 0.03) and controls (p = 0.001). Rituximab treatment was associated with large reduction (coefficient - 8.6, p < 0.001) and abatacept or cDMARD with moderate reductions (coefficients - 1.9 and - 1.8, p = 0.005, and p < 0.001) in the number of serotypes with positive antibody response to PCV + PPV23 (multivariate linear regression model). OPA was reduced in rituximab (Pn6B and Pn23F, p < 0.001), abatacept (Pn23F, p = 0.02), and cDMARD groups (Pn6B, p = 0.02) compared to controls. Prime-boost strategy enhances immunogenicity compared to single pneumococcal conjugate vaccination in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases receiving cDMARDs, to some extent in abatacept but not in patients on rituximab. Pneumococcal vaccination should be encouraged before the initiation of treatment with rituximab. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03762824. Registered on 4 December 2018, retrospectively registered.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32087733
doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-2124-3
pii: 10.1186/s13075-020-2124-3
pmc: PMC7036218
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antirheumatic Agents
0
Pneumococcal Vaccines
0
Rituximab
4F4X42SYQ6
Abatacept
7D0YB67S97
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03762824']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
36Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Epidemics. 2010 Jun;2(2):80-4
pubmed: 21031138
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jan;79(1):39-52
pubmed: 31413005
Vaccine. 2013 Dec 16;31(52):6261-5
pubmed: 24200977
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2001 Mar;8(2):363-9
pubmed: 11238223
J Immunol Methods. 2005 Jan;296(1-2):135-47
pubmed: 15680158
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007 Apr;13(4):369-76
pubmed: 17359320
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999 Jul;6(4):581-6
pubmed: 10391867
Clin Immunol. 2012 Sep;144(3):214-27
pubmed: 22842196
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 Jan;45(1):106-11
pubmed: 16287919
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 Jul 2;12(7):1777-94
pubmed: 27135390
BMC Rheumatol. 2018 Apr 5;2:12
pubmed: 30886963
J Rheumatol. 2017 Dec;44(12):1794-1803
pubmed: 28966211
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Sep;56(9):3044-56
pubmed: 17763423
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Jan;5(1):e51-e59
pubmed: 27955789
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2006 Apr;13(4):459-66
pubmed: 16603613
Vaccine. 2017 Jun 22;35(29):3639-3646
pubmed: 28552512
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014 Jul;66(7):1016-26
pubmed: 24339395
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 Oct 12;61(40):816-9
pubmed: 23051612
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 19;372(12):1114-25
pubmed: 25785969
PLoS Med. 2011 Apr;8(4):e1001017
pubmed: 21483718
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018 Jun 3;14(6):1464-1470
pubmed: 29432051
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2018 Jul - Aug;24:89-100
pubmed: 29860151
J Infect Dis. 2012 May 1;205(9):1408-16
pubmed: 22457293
Vaccine. 2013 Dec 17;32(1):133-45
pubmed: 23684824
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Sep;130(3 Suppl):S1-24
pubmed: 22935624
Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Aug;33(8):1068-73
pubmed: 2202306
AIDS. 2007 Nov 30;21(18):2425-34
pubmed: 18025879
J Rheumatol. 2014 Apr;41(4):666-72
pubmed: 24584924
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2016;12(4):417-25
pubmed: 26679631
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Oct;21(5):871-83
pubmed: 17870033
J Immunol. 2009 May 15;182(10):5982-93
pubmed: 19414749
Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Sep;62(9):2569-81
pubmed: 20872595