[Combined vitrectomy-lensectomy surgery with bag-in-the-lens or lens in the bag implantation: comparison of final visual acuity].
Chirurgie combinée vitrectomie et phakoéxérèse avec implantation bag-in-the-lens (BIL) ou de sac : comparaison de l’acuité visuelle finale.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Combined Modality Therapy
/ methods
Female
Humans
Lens Implantation, Intraocular
/ methods
Lens, Crystalline
/ surgery
Lenses, Intraocular
/ adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Phacoemulsification
/ adverse effects
Postoperative Complications
/ etiology
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Vision Disorders
/ surgery
Visual Acuity
/ physiology
Vitrectomy
/ adverse effects
Implantation d’un cristallin artificiel
Intraocular lens implantation
Phacoemulsification
Phakoémulsification
Vitrectomie
Vitrectomy
Journal
Journal francais d'ophtalmologie
ISSN: 1773-0597
Titre abrégé: J Fr Ophtalmol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 7804128
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
07
06
2019
revised:
28
08
2019
accepted:
28
08
2019
pubmed:
24
2
2020
medline:
26
9
2020
entrez:
24
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Combined vitrectomy-lensectomy surgery is a safe and effective procedure. Nevertheless, it is frequently complicated by posterior capsule opacification and the formation of posterior synechiae. These complications can be avoided by placing a "bag in the lens" (BIL) implant. The objective of this study is to compare the visual acuity gain (VA) after combined vitrectomy-lensectomy surgery between a group implanted with the BIL technique and a group with implantation in the bag (LIB). We included in the study all vitrectomy-lensectomy procedures for epiretinal membrane and vitreomacular traction performed between May 2013 and July 2016 at the Hospital and University Center of Caen. We compared the VA gain between the BIL group and the LIB group six months after surgery. A total of 33 patients were included in the study, consisting of 28 eyes in the BIL group and 8 eyes in the LIB group. The mean VA gain in the BIL group was -0.52 LogMAR (P<0.0001) and -0.56 LogMAR (P=0.0047) for the LIB group. The difference between the two groups was not significant (P=0.74). The use of the BIL technique during vitrectomy-lensectomy allows visual recovery as good as implantation within the capsular bag. In addition, this implant has the advantage of significantly reducing the occurrence of posterior synechiae and preventing anterior and posterior capsular proliferation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32087983
pii: S0181-5512(20)30050-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2019.08.015
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
fre
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
298-304Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.