Experience shapes activity dynamics and stimulus coding of VIP inhibitory cells.
behavior
learning
mouse
neuroscience
visual system
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 02 2020
26 02 2020
Historique:
received:
19
07
2019
accepted:
05
02
2020
entrez:
27
2
2020
pubmed:
27
2
2020
medline:
15
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cortical circuits can flexibly change with experience and learning, but the effects on specific cell types, including distinct inhibitory types, are not well understood. Here we investigated how excitatory and VIP inhibitory cells in layer 2/3 of mouse visual cortex were impacted by visual experience in the context of a behavioral task. Mice learned a visual change detection task with a set of eight natural scene images. Subsequently, during 2-photon imaging experiments, mice performed the task with these familiar images and three sets of novel images. Strikingly, the temporal dynamics of VIP activity differed markedly between novel and familiar images: VIP cells were stimulus-driven by novel images but were suppressed by familiar stimuli and showed ramping activity when expected stimuli were omitted from a temporally predictable sequence. This prominent change in VIP activity suggests that these cells may adopt different modes of processing under novel versus familiar conditions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32101169
doi: 10.7554/eLife.50340
pii: 50340
pmc: PMC7043888
doi:
pii:
Substances chimiques
Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide
37221-79-7
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4858779.v1']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB026908
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2020, Garrett et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
MG, SM, KR, DO, PG, NP, JK, LC, KM, AW, AL, XJ, PL, MB, WW, SM, SO No competing interests declared
Références
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Aug;18(8):1116-22
pubmed: 26167904
Front Neuroinform. 2009 Jan 15;2:10
pubmed: 19198666
Nat Neurosci. 2019 Nov;22(11):1834-1843
pubmed: 31636447
J Neurosci. 2014 Sep 10;34(37):12587-600
pubmed: 25209296
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Aug;18(8):1109-15
pubmed: 26098758
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Mar;4(3):193-202
pubmed: 12612632
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2018 Apr;49:75-83
pubmed: 29414069
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011 Oct;21(5):774-81
pubmed: 21742484
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018 Jan;19(1):34-48
pubmed: 29213134
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014 Jun;26:117-24
pubmed: 24508565
Trends Neurosci. 2013 Mar;36(3):141-51
pubmed: 23273272
Biostatistics. 2019 Feb 8;:
pubmed: 30753436
Perception. 2004;33(12):1463-73
pubmed: 15729913
Neuron. 2018 May 2;98(3):602-615.e8
pubmed: 29656873
Science. 2006 Mar 17;311(5767):1606-9
pubmed: 16543459
Nat Commun. 2019 Nov 7;10(1):5055
pubmed: 31699994
Nat Commun. 2016 Sep 20;7:12815
pubmed: 27649374
Nat Neurosci. 2020 Jan;23(1):138-151
pubmed: 31844315
Elife. 2016 Aug 23;5:
pubmed: 27552056
Neuron. 2015 Jun 17;86(6):1478-90
pubmed: 26051421
Brain Res. 2008 Feb 8;1193:57-66
pubmed: 18178173
Science. 2014 Aug 8;345(6197):660-5
pubmed: 25104383
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Jan;20(1):62-71
pubmed: 27798631
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2018 Oct;52:88-97
pubmed: 29727859
J Neurosci. 2017 Jul 5;37(27):6460-6474
pubmed: 28559381
J Vis. 2011 Dec 01;11(5):13
pubmed: 22207654
Nature. 2011 Dec 07;480(7377):331-5
pubmed: 22158104
Nature. 2014 Jan 16;505(7483):318-26
pubmed: 24429630
Neuron. 2014 Oct 22;84(2):355-62
pubmed: 25374359
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7725):124-127
pubmed: 30202092
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Jan;2(1):79-87
pubmed: 10195184
Neuron. 2013 Feb 20;77(4):723-35
pubmed: 23439124
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 May 15;162(1-2):8-13
pubmed: 17254636
Science. 2017 Mar 3;355(6328):954-959
pubmed: 28254942
Elife. 2015 Jan 27;4:e05558
pubmed: 25626167
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Nov;16(11):1662-70
pubmed: 24097044
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2018 Oct;52:131-138
pubmed: 29883940
Ann Appl Stat. 2018 Dec;12(4):2457-2482
pubmed: 30627301
J Neurosci. 2007 Aug 8;27(32):8533-45
pubmed: 17687031
Nat Neurosci. 2014 May;17(5):732-7
pubmed: 24657967
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Sep;21(9):1281-1289
pubmed: 30127430
Cell Rep. 2016 Jul 19;16(3):597-604
pubmed: 27396334
Neuron. 2019 Jan 2;101(1):91-102.e4
pubmed: 30472077
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 10;9(2):e88678
pubmed: 24520413
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2018 Oct;52:172-181
pubmed: 30064117
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Dec;19(12):1733-1742
pubmed: 27749828
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 06;5:1223
pubmed: 25414677
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Sep;22(9):764-779
pubmed: 30122170
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Dec;19(12):1658-1664
pubmed: 27618309
Cell. 2018 Jul 12;174(2):465-480.e22
pubmed: 30007418
Neuron. 2011 Dec 22;72(6):1040-54
pubmed: 22196338
Cereb Cortex. 2008 Nov;18(11):2540-52
pubmed: 18296433
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2018 Dec;53:50-56
pubmed: 29775823
Neuron. 2015 Mar 4;85(5):942-58
pubmed: 25741722
Neuron. 2012 Apr 12;74(1):193-205
pubmed: 22500640
Nat Protoc. 2014 Nov;9(11):2515-2538
pubmed: 25275789
Front Syst Neurosci. 2013 Jan 09;6:79
pubmed: 23316142
Neuron. 2018 Oct 24;100(2):424-435
pubmed: 30359606
Science. 1996 Dec 6;274(5293):1678-83
pubmed: 8939850
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Dec;16(12):1857-1863
pubmed: 24162654
Cell. 2014 Mar 13;156(6):1139-1152
pubmed: 24630718
Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Mar 7;265(1394):359-66
pubmed: 9523437
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Jun;21(6):851-859
pubmed: 29786081
Nature. 2013 Nov 28;503(7477):521-4
pubmed: 24097352
Nat Neurosci. 2012 Jan 22;15(3):449-55, S1-2
pubmed: 22267160
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Aug;16(8):1068-76
pubmed: 23817549
Science. 2000 Feb 18;287(5456):1273-6
pubmed: 10678835
J Neurosci. 2016 Apr 6;36(14):4000-9
pubmed: 27053207