Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Spanish fear-avoidance components scale and clinical implications in primary care.
Avoidance Learning
Chronic Disease
Cross-Cultural Comparison
Cross-Sectional Studies
Fear
/ psychology
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Musculoskeletal Pain
/ psychology
Patient Health Questionnaire
/ standards
Primary Health Care
/ methods
Psychometrics
/ methods
Reproducibility of Results
Spain
Translations
Weights and Measures
Chronic musculoskeletal pain disorders, patient health questionnaire, decision making
FACS
Fear-avoidance
The fear-avoidance components scale
Journal
BMC family practice
ISSN: 1471-2296
Titre abrégé: BMC Fam Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967792
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 02 2020
27 02 2020
Historique:
received:
07
08
2019
accepted:
21
02
2020
entrez:
29
2
2020
pubmed:
29
2
2020
medline:
20
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pain-related fear-avoidance (FA) is a common problem affecting many patients with painful medical conditions. As there is great interest in the clinical importance of the relationship between FA and disability, several questionnaires have been developed to measure FA. The Fear-Avoidance Components Scale (FACS) is a recently developed patient-reported instrument that addresses critical issues not previously considered in previous FA-related questionnaires. The original English version of the FACS demonstrated good reliability, internal consistency, and construct, criterion, and predictive validity. Two factors were determined: General Fear Avoidance and Types of Activities That are Avoided. The aim of this study was to to translate the FACS into European-style Spanish (FACS-Sp), and validate its psychometric properties. This two-stage psychometric study included 330 subjects with various chronic musculoskeletal pain disorders. An initial translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the FACS, from English to Spanish, was performed. Then, critical psychometric properties were analysed, including internal consistency by Cronbach's α coefficients, structural validity from the Maximum Likelihood Extraction (MLE), and convergent validity by Pearson correlation with the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). This study reports for the first time the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the FACS. Total scores ranged from 0 to 88 points, with a mean of 30.49 (±17.18). The FACS-Sp showed a high internal consistency for factor 1 (α = 0.902) and factor 2 (α = 0.88). Factor structure was two-dimensional and supported structural validity, accounting for 48.75% of the total variance. Convergent validity analysis found a significant Pearson correlation r = 0.414. This study reports for the first time the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the FACS-Sp. Psychometric properties supported the validation of FACS-Sp and ensured the conceptual equivalence with the original English version. In primary care and chronic pain rehabilitation, FA assessment is crucial for clinical decision-making and treatment guidance. The FACS-Sp offers a new measure of FA in Spanish speaking populations. Future research on the FACS-Sp should evaluate test-retest reliability, treatment responsiveness and psychometric comparisons with other translated versions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Pain-related fear-avoidance (FA) is a common problem affecting many patients with painful medical conditions. As there is great interest in the clinical importance of the relationship between FA and disability, several questionnaires have been developed to measure FA. The Fear-Avoidance Components Scale (FACS) is a recently developed patient-reported instrument that addresses critical issues not previously considered in previous FA-related questionnaires. The original English version of the FACS demonstrated good reliability, internal consistency, and construct, criterion, and predictive validity. Two factors were determined: General Fear Avoidance and Types of Activities That are Avoided. The aim of this study was to to translate the FACS into European-style Spanish (FACS-Sp), and validate its psychometric properties.
METHODS
This two-stage psychometric study included 330 subjects with various chronic musculoskeletal pain disorders. An initial translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the FACS, from English to Spanish, was performed. Then, critical psychometric properties were analysed, including internal consistency by Cronbach's α coefficients, structural validity from the Maximum Likelihood Extraction (MLE), and convergent validity by Pearson correlation with the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI).
RESULTS
This study reports for the first time the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the FACS. Total scores ranged from 0 to 88 points, with a mean of 30.49 (±17.18). The FACS-Sp showed a high internal consistency for factor 1 (α = 0.902) and factor 2 (α = 0.88). Factor structure was two-dimensional and supported structural validity, accounting for 48.75% of the total variance. Convergent validity analysis found a significant Pearson correlation r = 0.414.
CONCLUSION
This study reports for the first time the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the FACS-Sp. Psychometric properties supported the validation of FACS-Sp and ensured the conceptual equivalence with the original English version. In primary care and chronic pain rehabilitation, FA assessment is crucial for clinical decision-making and treatment guidance. The FACS-Sp offers a new measure of FA in Spanish speaking populations. Future research on the FACS-Sp should evaluate test-retest reliability, treatment responsiveness and psychometric comparisons with other translated versions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32106823
doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01116-x
pii: 10.1186/s12875-020-01116-x
pmc: PMC7047382
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
44Références
Pain. 2000 Apr;85(3):317-332
pubmed: 10781906
J Pain. 2011 Apr;12(4):425-35
pubmed: 20926355
Eur J Pain. 2000;4(3):259-66
pubmed: 10985869
BMC Fam Pract. 2005 Jul 14;6(1):29
pubmed: 16018809
Med Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S3-S11
pubmed: 17443116
Pain. 2012 Jun;153(6):1144-1147
pubmed: 22321917
Pain. 1993 Feb;52(2):157-168
pubmed: 8455963
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018 Feb;41(2):92-101
pubmed: 29329739
Spine J. 2014 May 1;14(5):816-36.e4
pubmed: 24412032
Behav Res Ther. 1983;21(4):401-8
pubmed: 6626110
Springerplus. 2016 Oct 21;5(1):1837
pubmed: 27818875
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Nov;40(23):2836-2845
pubmed: 28768437
Eur J Pain. 2016 May;20(5):701-10
pubmed: 26516705
Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2015;11(2):96-108
pubmed: 26088211
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Feb;46(2):38-43
pubmed: 26828236
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;63(7):737-45
pubmed: 20494804
J Pain. 2013 Oct;14(10):1019-30
pubmed: 23850095
PM R. 2016 Jul;8(7):618-28
pubmed: 26578431
Phys Ther. 2011 May;91(5):700-11
pubmed: 21451097
Pain Res Treat. 2011;2011:494196
pubmed: 22191022
J Occup Rehabil. 1995 Dec;5(4):235-52
pubmed: 24234727
Pain Pract. 2018 Feb;18(2):239-246
pubmed: 28449376
Pain Manag. 2014;4(5):363-74
pubmed: 25350076
Eur J Pain. 2013 Mar;17(3):299-312
pubmed: 23008191
Med Clin (Barc). 2008 Oct 18;131(13):487-92
pubmed: 19007576
Pain Med. 2017 Nov 01;18(11):2214-2223
pubmed: 28575454
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Apr 23;7(4):e104
pubmed: 29685875
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 24;13(9):e0204311
pubmed: 30248127
BMC Fam Pract. 2008 May 15;9:30
pubmed: 18482442
Pain Pract. 2018 Jul;18(6):777-787
pubmed: 29222851
Pain Pract. 2017 Feb;17(2):267-280
pubmed: 27739242
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;79:3-9
pubmed: 27297201
J Pain. 2018 Mar;19(3):317-329
pubmed: 29198933
BMJ Open. 2018 May 22;8(5):e021078
pubmed: 29789351
Clin J Pain. 2012 Jul;28(6):475-83
pubmed: 22673479
Psychol Health Med. 2018 Dec;23(10):1151-1167
pubmed: 29490476
Pain Pract. 2016 Apr;16(4):435-50
pubmed: 26228238
Clin J Pain. 2017 Dec;33(12):1088-1099
pubmed: 28328697
J Pain. 2005 Jun;6(6):384-91
pubmed: 15943960
BMJ. 2009 Jan 12;338:a2597
pubmed: 19139137
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jan;100(1):9-16
pubmed: 30312595
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42
pubmed: 17161752
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Mar 20;18(1):41
pubmed: 28320337
Psicothema. 2013;25(2):151-7
pubmed: 23628527
Pain. 2008 Mar;135(1-2):142-50
pubmed: 17611036
Pain. 1995 Sep;62(3):363-372
pubmed: 8657437
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jan 1;31(1):104-10
pubmed: 16395186
Pain. 1992 Jul;50(1):67-73
pubmed: 1513605