A grounded theory study on work related stress in professionals who provide health & social care for people who exhibit behaviours that challenge.
Adult
Female
Focus Groups
Grounded Theory
Health Personnel
/ psychology
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Psychological
Occupational Health
Occupational Stress
/ etiology
Problem Behavior
/ psychology
Professional-Patient Relations
Social Work
United Kingdom
Work Engagement
Young Adult
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
21
05
2019
accepted:
13
02
2020
entrez:
29
2
2020
pubmed:
29
2
2020
medline:
19
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Providing direct health and social care services for people who exhibit behaviours that challenge can be a highly stressful occupation. Existing literature has suggested that there is a need to develop further theoretical understanding of how work related stress can be reduced in professions that consist of providing care for people who exhibit behaviours that challenge. The aim for this study was to use a Classic Grounded Theory approach to develop a theoretical framework to illustrate a common issue that could influence work related stress levels experienced when managing behaviours that challenge in health and social care settings. A series of focus groups and 1:1 semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore the articulated experiences of 47 health/social care professionals who provide care for people who exhibit behaviours that challenge. This led to the development of Therapeutic Engagement Stress Theory (TEST), which illustrates that the perceived capacity to therapeutically engage with people who exhibit behaviours that challenge is an issue that can influence the levels of stress experienced by health/social care professionals. TEST provides a framework that could be applied to identify specific factors that inhibit staff to successfully deliver caring interventions for people who exhibit behaviours that challenge, and also inform bespoke support mechanisms to reduce stress in health/social care professionals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32108179
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229706
pii: PONE-D-19-14339
pmc: PMC7046268
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0229706Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Dec;48(6):622-31
pubmed: 15548253
Geriatr Nurs. 2010 Jul-Aug;31(4):246-53
pubmed: 20682402
Am Psychol. 2004 Nov;59(8):676-684
pubmed: 15554821
J Health Psychol. 2013 Sep;18(9):1220-31
pubmed: 23129834
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Aug;32(6):669-74
pubmed: 21983395
BMJ Open. 2012 Oct 18;2(5):
pubmed: 23087013
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2004 Sep;42(9):22-33
pubmed: 15493493
J Interprof Care. 2002 Aug;16(3):211-20
pubmed: 12201985
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(5):291-9
pubmed: 14569646
J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2008 Dec;33(4):323-9
pubmed: 19039692
Lancet. 2000 Feb 12;355(9203):533-7
pubmed: 10683003
Psychol Med. 2016 Mar;46(4):683-97
pubmed: 26620157
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Sep;63(5):506-16
pubmed: 18727753
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2009 Mar;30(3):159-64
pubmed: 19291492
J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2010 Sep;35(3):207-10
pubmed: 20809882
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2010 Jul;46(3):221-33
pubmed: 20591129
Gerontologist. 2003 Oct;43(5):697-711
pubmed: 14570966
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Nov;21(21-22):3134-42
pubmed: 23083388
J Trauma Stress. 2008 Dec;21(6):503-6
pubmed: 19107726
J Abnorm Psychol. 1991 Nov;100(4):569-82
pubmed: 1757671
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2011 May;55(5):500-10
pubmed: 21418365
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Jan 12;12(1):652-66
pubmed: 25588157
J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96
pubmed: 6668417
Health Policy. 2015 Jul;119(7):856-9
pubmed: 25981590
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2008 Nov;52(11):905-16
pubmed: 18680532
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2003 Nov;47(Pt 8):622-7
pubmed: 14641810