Methods for estimating between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analysis of odds ratios.
between-study variance
binary outcome
heterogeneity
meta-analysis
random-effects model
Journal
Research synthesis methods
ISSN: 1759-2887
Titre abrégé: Res Synth Methods
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101543738
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
received:
04
07
2019
revised:
22
12
2019
accepted:
18
02
2020
pubmed:
1
3
2020
medline:
16
6
2021
entrez:
1
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In random-effects meta-analysis the between-study variance ( τ
Substances chimiques
Diuretics
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
426-442Subventions
Organisme : Economic and Social Research Council
ID : ES/L011859/1
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Research Synthesis Methods published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, Sheldon TA, Song F. Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2000.
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser A. 2009;172:137-159.
Kulinskaya E, Dollinger MB. An accurate test for homogeneity of odds ratios based on Cochran's Q-statistic. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15(1):49.
van Aert RC, van Assen MA, Viechtbauer W. Statistical properties of methods based on the Q-statistic for constructing a confidence interval for the between-study variance in meta-analysis. Res Syn Meth. 2019;10(2):225-239. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1336.
DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177-188.
Mandel J, Paule RC. Interlaboratory evaluation of a material with unequal numbers of replicates. Anal Chem. 1970;42(11):1194-1197.
Jackson D. Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random effects meta-analysis using generalised Cochran heterogeneity statistics. Res Synth Methods. 2013;4(3):220-229.
Hardy RJ, Thompson SG. A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects. Stat Med. 1996;15(6):619-629.
Viechtbauer W. Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2007;26(1):37-52.
Biggerstaff BJ, Jackson D. The exact distribution of Cochran's heterogeneity statistic in one-way random effects meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2008;27(29):6093-6110.
Gart JJ, Pettigrew HM, Thomas DG. The effect of bias, variance estimation, skewness and kurtosis of the empirical logit on weighted least squares analyses. Biometrika. 1985;72(1):179-190.
Gart JJ, Zweifel JR. On the bias of various estimators of the logit and its variance with application to quantal bioassay. Biometrika. 1967;54:181-187.
Bhaumik DK, Amatya A, Normand SLT, et al. Meta-analysis of rare binary adverse event data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2012;107(498):555-567.
Jackson D, White IR. When should meta-analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions? Biom J. 2018;60:1040-1058.
Bradburn MJ, Deeks JJ, Berlin JA, Russell LA. Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events. Stat Med. 2007;26(1):53-77.
Kuss O. Statistical methods for meta-analyses including information from studies without any events-add nothing to nothing and succeed nevertheless. Stat Med. 2015;34(7):1097-1116.
Cheng J, Pullenayegum E, Marshall JK, Iorio A, Thabane L. Impact of including or excluding both-armed zero-event studies on using standard meta-analysis methods for rare event outcome: a simulation study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(8):e010983.
Turner RM, Omar RZ, Yang M, Goldstein H, Thompson SG. A multilevel model framework for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes. Stat Med. 2000;19(24):3417-3432.
Stijnen T, Hamza TH, Özdemir P. Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data. Stat Med. 2010;29(29):3046-3067.
Jackson D, Law M, Stijnen T, Viechtbauer W, White IR. A comparison of seven random-effects models for meta-analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio. Stat Med. 2018;37:1059-1085.
Bakbergenuly I, Kulinskaya E. Meta-analysis of binary outcomes via generalized linear mixed models: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):70.
Van Houwelingen HC, Zwinderman KH, Stijnen T. A bivariate approach to meta-analysis. Stat Med. 1993;12:2273-2284.
Veroniki AA, Jackson D, Viechtbauer W, et al. Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis. Res Syn Meth. 2016;7(1):55-79.
Langan D, Higgins JP, Simmonds M. Comparative performance of heterogeneity variance estimators in meta-analysis: a review of simulation studies. Res Syn Meth. 2017;8(2):181-198. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1198.
Langan D, Higgins JP, Jackson D, et al. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses. Res Syn Meth. 2019;10(1):83-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1316.
Viechtbauer W. Bias and efficiency of meta-analytic variance estimators in the random-effects model. J Educ Behav Stat. 2005;30(3):261-293.
Kosmidis I, Guolo A, Varin C. Improving the accuracy of likelihood-based inference in meta-analysis and meta-regression. Biometrika. 2017;104(2):489-496.
Paule RC, Mandel J. Consensus values and weighting factors. J Res Natl Bur Stand. 1982;87(5):377-385.
Carter G, Rolph J. Emprical Bayes methods applied to estimating fire alarm probabilities. J Am Stat Assoc. 1974;69:880-885.
Morris C. Parametric empirical Bayes inference: theory and applications. J Am Stat Assoc. 1983;78:47-55.
Rukhin A, Vangel M. Estimation of a common mean and weighted means statistics. J Am Stat Assoc. 1998;93:303-308.
Rukhin A, Biggerstaff B, Vangel M. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of a common mean and the Mandel-Paule algorithm. J Stat Plan Inference. 2000;83:319-330.
DerSimonian R, Kacker R. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28(2):105-114.
Kulinskaya E, Dollinger M, Bjørkestøl K. On the moments of Cochran's Q statistic under the null hypothesis, with application to the meta-analysis of risk difference. Res Syn Meth. 2011;2:254-270. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.54.
Jackson D, Bowden J. Confidence intervals for the between-study variance in random-effects meta-analysis using generalised heterogeneity statistics: should we use unequal tails? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):118.
Viechtbauer W. Package metafor. The Comprehensive R Archive Network 2015.
Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954;10(1):101-129.
Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1985.
Hunter JE, Schmidt FL. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1990.
Greenland S, Robins JM. Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data. Biometrics. 1985;41:55-68.
Hartung J, Knapp G. A refined method for the meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials with binary outcome. Stat Med. 2001;20(24):3875-3889.
Sidik K, Jonkman JN. A simple confidence interval for meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(21):3153-3159.
Sánchez-Meca J, Marín-Martínez F. Testing the significance of a common risk difference in meta-analysis. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2000;33(3):299-313.
Bakbergenuly I, Hoaglin DC, Kulinskaya E. Simulation study of estimation of between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analysis of odds ratio. In: eprint arXiv:1902.07154v1 [stat.ME].; 2019.
Collins R, Yusuf S, Peto R. Overview of randomised trials of diuretics in pregnancy. BMJ. 1985;290(6461):17-23.
Biggerstaff BJ, Tweedie RL. Incorporating variability in estimates of heterogeneity in the random effects model in meta-analysis. Stat Med. 1997;16(7):753-768.
Kulinskaya E, Olkin I. An overdispersion model in meta-analysis. Stat Model. 2014;14(1):49-76.
Bakbergenuly I, Kulinskaya E. Beta-binomial model for meta-analysis of odds ratios. Stat Med. 2017;36(11):1715-1734.
Shuster JJ. Empirical vs natural weighting in random effects meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2010;29(12):1259-1265. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3607.