The effect of interprofessional education on healthcare providers' intentions to engage in interprofessional shared decision-making: Perspectives from the theory of planned behaviour.
collaboration
interprofessional
interprofessional education
shared decision-making
team-based care
Journal
Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
ISSN: 1365-2753
Titre abrégé: J Eval Clin Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9609066
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
17
07
2019
revised:
05
02
2020
accepted:
06
02
2020
pubmed:
3
3
2020
medline:
29
7
2021
entrez:
2
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The present study aimed to investigate the effects of interprofessional education on healthcare providers' intentions to engage in an interprofessional shared decision-making (IP-SDM) process at emergency department and exploring the affecting factors on their intentions. We conducted the study through a sequential explanatory mixed method (quantitative-qualitative) design. All ED residents and nurses from two university hospitals were invited and assigned to the intervention and control groups. The intervention group was exposed to case-based learning sessions conducted by applying interprofessional strategies. The intentions of the participants engaged in IP-SDM were assessed before and 2 weeks after the intervention by a questionnaire designed based on the theory of planned behaviour. The questionnaire scores were compared between the intervention and control groups using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Partial eta-squared (η Out of 117 potentially eligible healthcare professionals, 113 completed the study in the intervention (n = 55) and control (n = 58) groups. The results showed that the difference between the mean scores of the learners in the intervention (1.41 ± 0.27) and control (0.80 ± 0.52) groups was statistically significant (P-value = .00001). The main effect of the intervention and a large educational effect size for the intervention were found to be statistically significant F (1, 11) = 180.54, P-value = .00001, η Our findings suggested that applying interprofessional education strategies could improve the learners' intention to engage in IP-SDM. Moreover, the results showed that the interprofessional collaboration among team members, adherence to the team-based care principles, and administrative support at different levels could be the influential factors the intentions of the participants to engage in IP-SDM.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1153-1161Subventions
Organisme : National Agency for Strategic Research in Medical Education. Tehran. Iran.
ID : 960914
Informations de copyright
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Références
Rennke S, Yuan P, Monash B, et al. The SDM 3 circle model: a literature synthesis and adaptation for shared decision-making in the hospital. J Hosp Med. 2017;12(12):1001.
Shay LA, Lafata JE. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med Decis Making. 2015;35(1):114-131.
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean?(or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(5):681-692.
Makoul G, Clayman M. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60(3):301-312.
Légaré F, Stacey D, Pouliot S, et al. Interprofessionalism and shared decision-making in primary care: a stepwise approach towards a new model. J Interprof Care. 2011;25(1):18-25.
Davis K, Schoenbaum S, Audet A. A 2020 vision of patient-centered primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:953-957.
WHO. Framework for Action on Interprofessional Education& Collaborative Practice the Health Professions Network Nursing and Midwifery Office within the Department of Human Resources for Health. Retrieved from http://wwwwhoint/hrh/nursing_midwifery/en/; 2010.
Dogba MJ, Menear M, Stacey D, Brière N, Légaré F. The evolution of an Inter-professional shared decision-making research program: reflective case study of an emerging paradigm. Int J Integ Care. 2016;16(3):1-11. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.2212.
Légaré F, Stacey D, Brière N, et al. Healthcare providers' intentions to engage in an interprofessional approach to shared decision-making in home care programs: a mixed methods study. J Interprof Care. 2013;27:214-222.
Reeves S, Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, et al. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(1):CD002213.
Légaré F, Stacey D, Brière N, et al. An interprofessional approach to shared decision making: an exploratory case study with family caregivers of one IP home care team. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14(38):1-13.
Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Predicting and Changing Behavior: the Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Psychology Press; 2010.
Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Behaviour and Health Education: Theory Research and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass press; 2008. 2008.
Elo S, Kynga SH. The qualitative content analysis process. Res Method. 2007;62(1):107-115.
Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361-1367.
Keshmiri F, Rezai M, Mosaddegh R, et al. Effectiveness of an interprofessional education model based on the transtheoretical model of behaviour change to improve interprofessional collaboration. J Interprof Care. 2017;31(3):307-316.
Keshmiri F, Sohrabpour A, Farahmand S, et al. Inter-professional ethics education in team-based approach: values and ethics development in inter-professional collaboration. Iran J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2013;6(4):42-56.
Moradi K, Rahmati Najarkolai A, Keshmiri F. Interprofessional teamwork education: moving toward the patient-centered approach. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2016;47(10):449-460.
Légaré F, Borduas F, Jacques A, et al. Developing a theory-based instrument to assess the impact of continuing professional development activities on clinical practice: a study protocol. Implement Sci. 2011;6(17):1-6.
Keshmiri F, Salar J. Interprofessional shared decision-making: assessment of behavioral intention though a tool based on the theory planned behavior. Strides Develop Med Educ. 15(1):1-6.
Polit D, Beck C. Nursing Research Principles & Methods. 7th ed. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
Schwandt TA, Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Judging interpretations: but is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Dir Eval. 2007;2007(114):11-25.
Chong W, Aslani P, Chen T. Shared decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare: a qualitative study exploring perceptions of barriers and facilitators. J Interprof Care. 2013;27(5):373-379. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.13562013.13785503.
Hall P, Weaver L. Interdisciplinary education and teamwork: a long and winding road. Med Educ. 2001;35:867-875.
Ponzer S, Hylin U, Kusoffsky A, et al. Interprofessional training in the context of clinical practice: goals and students' perceptions on clinical education wards. Med Educ. 2004;38:727-736.
Thistlethwaite JE, Davies D, Ekeocha S, et al. The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 23. Med Teach. 2012;34(6):e421-e444.
Stacey D, Brière N, Robitaille H, Fraser K, Desroches S, Légaré F. A systematic process for creating and appraising clinical vignettes to illustrate interprofessional shared decision making. J Interprof Care. 2014;28(5):453-459. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.13562014.13911157.
Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;152(9):1423.
Kim SS, Kaplowitz S, Johnston MV. The effects of physician empathy on patient satisfaction and compliance. Eval Health Prof. 2004;27(3):237-251.
Chong W, Aslani P, Chen T. Multiple perspectives on shared decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare. J Interprof Care. 2013;27(3):223-230. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.13562013.13767225.
Drummond N, Abbott K, Williamson T, Somji B. Interprofessional primary care in academic family medicine clinics: implications for education and training. Can Fam Physician. 2012;58(8):450-458.
Tschannen D, Kalisch BJ. The impact of nurse/physician collaboration on patient length of stay. J Nurs Manage. 2009;17(7):796-803.
Papathanassoglou ED, Tseroni M, Karydaki A, Vazaiou G, Kassikou J, Lavdaniti M. Practice and clinical decision-making autonomy among Hellenic critical care nurses. J Nurs Manage. 2005;13(2):154-164.
Bucknall T. The clinical landscape of critical care: nurses' decision-making. J Adv Nurs. 2003;43(3):310-319.
Vafadar Z, Vanaki Z, Ebadi A. Barriers to implementation of team care and interprofessional education: the viewpoints of educational managers of Iranian health system. Iran J Med Educ. 2015;14(11):936-949.
Valizadeh L, Zamanzadeh V, Irajpour A, Shohani M. “Discrimination”, the Main concern of Iranian nurses over inter-professional collaboration: an explorative qualitative study. J Caring Sci. 2015;4(2):115-123.