Rate and risk factors for wound complications after internal hemipelvectomy.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hemipelvectomy
/ adverse effects
Humans
Incidence
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Pelvic Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
/ methods
Risk Factors
Surgical Wound Dehiscence
/ epidemiology
Time Factors
United States
/ epidemiology
Young Adult
Hemipelvectomy
Journal
The bone & joint journal
ISSN: 2049-4408
Titre abrégé: Bone Joint J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101599229
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
entrez:
3
3
2020
pubmed:
3
3
2020
medline:
13
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although internal hemipelvectomy is associated with a high incidence of morbidity, especially wound complications, few studies have examined rates of wound complications in these patients or have identified factors associated with the consequences. The present study aimed to: 1) determine the rate of wound and other complications requiring surgery after internal hemipelvectomy; and 2) identify factors that affect the rate of wound complications and can be used to stratify patients by risk of wound complications. The medical records of 123 patients undergoing internal hemipelvectomy were retrospectively reviewed, with a focus on both overall complications and wound complications. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association between host, tumour, and surgical factors and rates of postoperative wound complications. The overall rate of postoperative complications requiring surgery was 49.6%. Wound complications were observed in 34.1% of patients, hardware-related complications in 13.2%, graft-related complications in 9.1%, and local recurrence in 5.7%. On multivariate analysis, extrapelvic tumour extension (odds ratio (OR) 23.28; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.97 to 274.67; p = 0.012), both intra- and extrapelvic tumour extension (OR 46.48; 95% CI, 3.50 to 617.77; p = 0.004), blood transfusion ≥ 20 units (OR 50.28; 95% CI, 1.63 to 1550.32; p = 0.025), vascular sacrifice of the internal iliac artery (OR 64.56; 95% CI, 6.33 to 658.43; p < 0.001), and use of a structural allograft (OR, 6.57; 95% CI, 1.70 to 25.34; p = 0.001) were significantly associated with postoperative wound complications. Internal hemipelvectomy is associated with high rates of morbidity, especially wound complications. Several host, tumour, and surgical variables are associated with wound complications. The ability to stratify patients by risk of wound complications can help refine surgical and wound-healing planning and may lead to better outcomes in patients undergoing internal hemipelvectomy. Cite this article:
Identifiants
pubmed: 32114813
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-1329
pmc: PMC7123980
mid: NIHMS1571049
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
280-284Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Références
Acta Orthop Scand. 2004 Jun;75(3):333-8
pubmed: 15260427
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Sep;81(5):796-802
pubmed: 10530839
Clin Orthop Surg. 2010 Sep;2(3):160-6
pubmed: 20808587
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan;472(1):349-59
pubmed: 23975252
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan;471(1):324-31
pubmed: 23054524
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Feb;15(2):155-167
pubmed: 28188186
Acta Orthop Scand. 1966;37(4):333-8
pubmed: 5961762
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Mar;89(3):579-87
pubmed: 17332107
J Surg Oncol. 2009 Mar 1;99(3):169-72
pubmed: 19072993
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003 Sep;123(7):340-4
pubmed: 12838435
Bone Joint J. 2014 Feb;96-B(2):270-3
pubmed: 24493196
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 May;93(5):684-8
pubmed: 21511936
Chir Organi Mov. 1990;75(1 Suppl):217-40
pubmed: 2249538
Ann Surg Oncol. 2003 Aug;10(7):778-82
pubmed: 12900369
Acta Orthop Scand. 1998 Aug;69(4):333-8
pubmed: 9798436
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jan;15(1):355-63
pubmed: 17955297
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Aug;461:180-8
pubmed: 17452921
Acta Orthop Scand. 1996 Aug;67(4):333-8
pubmed: 8792734
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jun;90(6):1265-71
pubmed: 18519320