First evidence of the deletion in the pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes in Plasmodium falciparum from Equatorial Guinea.
Deletion
Equatorial Guinea
Malaria
Pfhrp2/Pfhrp3
RDTs
Journal
Malaria journal
ISSN: 1475-2875
Titre abrégé: Malar J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101139802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Mar 2020
02 Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
18
11
2019
accepted:
22
02
2020
entrez:
4
3
2020
pubmed:
4
3
2020
medline:
17
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) as a good alternative malaria-diagnosis method in remote parts of sub-Saharan Africa. The majority of commercial RDTs currently available detect the Plasmodium falciparum protein histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2). There have also been recent reports of pfhrp2 gene deletions being found in parasites collected from several African countries. The WHO has concluded that lacking the pfhrp2 gene must be monitored in Africa. The purpose of the study was to analyse why the samples that were positive by PCR were negative by RDTs and, therefore, to determine whether there have been deletions in the pfhrp2 and/or pfhrp3 genes. Malaria NM-PCR was carried out on all the samples collected in the field. A group of 128 samples was positive by PCR but negative by RDT; these samples were classified as RDT false-negatives. PCR was carried out for exon2 of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes to detect the presence or absence of these two genes. Frequencies with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for prevalence estimates. Associations were assessed by the Chi square test or Fisher´s exact test. The level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using the software package SPSSv.15.0. After PCR, 81 samples were identified (4.7%, 95% CI 3.8-5.8) which had deletion in both genes, pfhrp2 and pfhrp3. Overall, however, 11 samples (0.6%, 95% CI 0.36-1.14) had deletion only in pfhrp2 but not in pfhrp3, and 15 (0.9%, 95% CI 0.6-1.5) presented with deletion only in pfhrp3 but not in pfhrp2. Considering the pfhrp2 gene separately, within the total of 1724 samples, 92 (5.3%, 95% CI 4.37-6.5) had evidence of deletion. The present study provides the first evidence of deletion in the pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes in P. falciparum isolates from Equatorial Guinea. However, larger studies across different regions within the country and across different seasonal profiles are needed to determine the full extent of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletion. It is strongly recommended to implement an active surveillance programme in order to detect any increases in pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletion frequencies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) as a good alternative malaria-diagnosis method in remote parts of sub-Saharan Africa. The majority of commercial RDTs currently available detect the Plasmodium falciparum protein histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP2). There have also been recent reports of pfhrp2 gene deletions being found in parasites collected from several African countries. The WHO has concluded that lacking the pfhrp2 gene must be monitored in Africa. The purpose of the study was to analyse why the samples that were positive by PCR were negative by RDTs and, therefore, to determine whether there have been deletions in the pfhrp2 and/or pfhrp3 genes.
METHODS
METHODS
Malaria NM-PCR was carried out on all the samples collected in the field. A group of 128 samples was positive by PCR but negative by RDT; these samples were classified as RDT false-negatives. PCR was carried out for exon2 of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes to detect the presence or absence of these two genes. Frequencies with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for prevalence estimates. Associations were assessed by the Chi square test or Fisher´s exact test. The level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using the software package SPSSv.15.0.
RESULTS
RESULTS
After PCR, 81 samples were identified (4.7%, 95% CI 3.8-5.8) which had deletion in both genes, pfhrp2 and pfhrp3. Overall, however, 11 samples (0.6%, 95% CI 0.36-1.14) had deletion only in pfhrp2 but not in pfhrp3, and 15 (0.9%, 95% CI 0.6-1.5) presented with deletion only in pfhrp3 but not in pfhrp2. Considering the pfhrp2 gene separately, within the total of 1724 samples, 92 (5.3%, 95% CI 4.37-6.5) had evidence of deletion.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The present study provides the first evidence of deletion in the pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes in P. falciparum isolates from Equatorial Guinea. However, larger studies across different regions within the country and across different seasonal profiles are needed to determine the full extent of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletion. It is strongly recommended to implement an active surveillance programme in order to detect any increases in pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletion frequencies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32122352
doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03178-9
pii: 10.1186/s12936-020-03178-9
pmc: PMC7050119
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antigens, Protozoan
0
HRP-2 antigen, Plasmodium falciparum
0
HRP3 protein, Plasmodium falciparum
0
Protozoan Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
99Références
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002 Apr;96 Suppl 1:S199-204
pubmed: 12055839
Malar J. 2016 Feb 18;15:101
pubmed: 26891848
PLoS One. 2010 Jan 25;5(1):e8091
pubmed: 20111602
Malar J. 2014 Feb 24;13:68
pubmed: 24564912
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997 Jan;56(1):44-8
pubmed: 9063360
Sci Rep. 2017 May 2;7(1):1308
pubmed: 28465622
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 7;7(1):14718
pubmed: 29116127
Malar J. 2017 May 6;16(1):189
pubmed: 28477621
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Jun;5(6):e1192
pubmed: 21713024
Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Nov 25;16(22):10881-90
pubmed: 2849754
Appl Parasitol. 1994 Nov;35(4):266-72
pubmed: 7812314
Malar J. 2017 Mar 20;16(1):123
pubmed: 28320390
Trop Med Int Health. 2008 Dec;13(12):1495-500
pubmed: 18983278
Malar J. 2017 Nov 14;16(1):464
pubmed: 29137629
J Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 1;216(1):36-44
pubmed: 28177502
Malar J. 2018 Feb 23;17(1):92
pubmed: 29471833
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Feb;86(2):194-8
pubmed: 22302847
J Infect Dis. 2005 Sep 1;192(5):870-7
pubmed: 16088837
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 14;10(9):e0138518
pubmed: 26368282
Malar J. 2018 Sep 17;17(1):333
pubmed: 30223852
Malar J. 2015 Nov 16;14:456
pubmed: 26573911
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 12;11(8):e0157949
pubmed: 27518538
Malar J. 2011 Nov 02;10:332
pubmed: 22047131
Malar J. 2010 Jan 21;9:28
pubmed: 20092620