The impact of transitioning from availability of outside records within electronic health records to integration of local and outside records within electronic health records.
Academic Medical Centers
Adult
Datasets as Topic
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
Electronic Health Records
Female
Health Information Exchange
/ statistics & numerical data
Health Information Interoperability
Humans
Interrupted Time Series Analysis
Male
Middle Aged
San Francisco
Systems Integration
User-Computer Interface
audit log
data integration
interoperability
Journal
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
ISSN: 1527-974X
Titre abrégé: J Am Med Inform Assoc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9430800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 04 2020
01 04 2020
Historique:
received:
05
11
2019
revised:
12
12
2019
accepted:
13
01
2020
pubmed:
7
3
2020
medline:
13
3
2021
entrez:
6
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
While there has been a substantial increase in health information exchange, levels of outside records use by frontline providers are low. We assessed whether integration between outside data and local data results in increased viewing of outside records, overall and by encounter, provider, and patient type. Using data from UCSF Health, we measured change in outside record views after integrating the list of local (UCSF) and outside (other health systems on Epic [Epic Systems, Verona, WI]) encounters on the Chart Review tab. Previously, providers only viewed records from outside encounters on a separate tab. We used an interrupted time series design (with outside record viewing event counts aggregated to the week level) to measure changes in the level and trend over a 1-year period. There was a large increase in the level of outside record views of 22 920 per week (P < .001). The change in trend went from a weekly increase of 116 (P < .05) to a decrease of 402 (P = .08), reflecting a small effect decay. There were increases in the level of views for all provider and encounter types: attendings (n = 3675), residents (n = 3277), and nurses (n = 914); and inpatient (n = 1676), emergency (n = 487), and outpatient (n = 7228) (P < .001 for all). Results persisted when adjusted for total encounter volume. While outside records were readily available before the encounter integration, the simple step of clicking on a separate tab appears to have depressed use. User interface designs that comingle local and outside data result in higher levels of viewing and should be more broadly pursued.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32134449
pii: 5782094
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa006
pmc: PMC7647298
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
606-612Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Med Care. 2014 Mar;52(3):227-34
pubmed: 24374414
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Dec 2;161(11):803-11
pubmed: 25437408
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e103-e110
pubmed: 27521368
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):690-7
pubmed: 21846788
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Mar;31(3):527-36
pubmed: 22392663
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 6;14(2):e0205379
pubmed: 30726208
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):328-33
pubmed: 22058169
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Aug 1;25(8):1054-1063
pubmed: 29788287
Learn Health Syst. 2017 Jan 06;1(2):e10021
pubmed: 31245558
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Apr 16;5(2):388-401
pubmed: 25024756
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 18;378(3):214-216
pubmed: 29342387
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Mar;34(3):477-83
pubmed: 25732499