Association of brachial-cuff excess pressure with carotid intima-media thickness in Australian adults: a cross-sectional study.
Journal
Journal of hypertension
ISSN: 1473-5598
Titre abrégé: J Hypertens
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8306882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
entrez:
6
3
2020
pubmed:
7
3
2020
medline:
30
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Reservoir pressure parameters [e.g. reservoir pressure (RP) and excess pressure (XSP)] measured using tonometry predict cardiovascular events beyond conventional risk factors. However, the operator dependency of tonometry impedes widespread use. An operator-independent cuff-based device can reasonably estimate the intra-aortic RP and XSP from brachial volumetric waveforms, but whether these estimates are clinically relevant to preclinical phenotypes of cardiovascular risk has not been investigated. The RP and XSP were derived from brachial volumetric waveforms measured using cuff oscillometry (SphygmoCor XCEL) in 1691 mid-life adults from the CheckPoint study (a population-based cross-sectional study nested in the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children). Carotid intima--media thickness (carotid IMT, n = 1447) and carotid--femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV, n = 1632) were measured as preclinical phenotypes of cardiovascular risk. Confounders were conventional risk factors that were correlated with both exposures and outcomes or considered as physiologically important. There was a modest association between XSP and carotid IMT (β = 0.76 μm, 95% CI, 0.25-1.26 partial R = 0.8%) after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, heart rate, smoking, diabetes, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and mean arterial pressure. Neither RP nor XSP were associated with PWV in the similarly adjusted models (β = -0.47 cm/s, 95% CI, -1.15 to 0.20, partial R = 0.2% for RP, and β = 0.04 cm/s, 95% CI, -0.59 to 0.67, partial R = 0.01% for XSP). Cuff-based XSP associates with carotid IMT independent of conventional risk factors, including traditional BP, but the association was weak, indicating that further investigation is warranted to understand the clinical significance of reservoir pressure parameters.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32134846
doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002310
pii: 00004872-202004000-00023
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
723-730Références
Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360:1903–1913.
Kannel WB. Role of blood pressure in cardiovascular disease: the Framingham Study. Angiology 1975; 26:1–14.
GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016; 388:1659–1724.
Segers P, O’Rourke MF, Parker K, Westerhof N, Hughes A. Towards a consensus on the understanding and analysis of the pulse waveform: results from the 2016 Workshop on Arterial Hemodynamics: past, present and future. Artery Res 2017; 18:75–80.
Wang JJ, O’Brien AB, Shrive NG, Parker KH, Tyberg JV. Time-domain representation of ventricular-arterial coupling as a windkessel and wave system. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003; 284:H1358–H1368.
Davies JE, Baksi J, Francis DP, Hadjiloizou N, Whinnett ZI, Manisty CH, et al. The arterial reservoir pressure increases with aging and is the major determinant of the aortic augmentation index. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2010; 298:H580–H586.
Davies JE, Lacy P, Tillin T, Collier D, Cruickshank JK, Francis DP, et al. Excess pressure integral predicts cardiovascular events independent of other risk factors in the conduit artery functional evaluation substudy of Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial. Hypertens 2014; 64:60–68.
Wang WT, Sung SH, Wang JJ, Wu CK, Lin LY, Lee JC, et al. Excess pressure integral predicts long-term all-cause mortality in stable heart failure patients. Am J Hypertens 2017; 30:271–278.
Cheng HM, Chuang SY, Wang JJ, Shih YT, Wang HN, Huang CJ, et al. Prognostic significance of mechanical biomarkers derived from pulse wave analysis for predicting long-term cardiovascular mortality in two population-based cohorts. Int J Cardiol 2016; 215:388–395.
Hametner B, Wassertheurer S, Hughes AD, Parker KH, Weber T, Eber B. Reservoir and excess pressures predict cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. Int J Cardiol 2014; 171:31–36.
Parragh S, Hametner B, Mayer C, Wassertheurer S. U-shaped relationship of reservoir pressure to cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Artery Res 2016; 16:55.
Narayan O, Davies JE, Hughes AD, Dart AM, Parker KH, Reid C, Cameron JD. Central aortic reservoir-wave analysis improves prediction of cardiovascular events in elderly hypertensives. Hypertens 2015; 65:629–635.
Schneider A, Krauze T, Minczykowski A, Dziarmaga M, Piskorski J, Szczepanik A, et al. Arterial excess reservoir pressure integral as a predictor of cardiovascular complications in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Pol Arch Intern Med 2018; 128:228–234.
McEniery CM, Cockcroft JR, Roman MJ, Franklin SS, Wilkinson IB. Central blood pressure: current evidence and clinical importance. Eur Heart J 2014; 35:1719–1725.
Peng X, Schultz MG, Picone DS, Dwyer N, Black JA, Roberts-Thomson P, Sharman JE. Non-invasive measurement of reservoir pressure parameters from brachial-cuff blood pressure waveforms. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2018; 20:1703–1711.
Norton A, Monahan K. Wave 6 weighting and non-response. LSAC technical paper. 2015. 15.
Wake M, Clifford S, York E, Mensah F, Gold L, Burgner D, et al. Introducing growing up in Australia's Child Health CheckPoint.
Services DoS. Longitudinal Study of Australian Children Release 7.0 (Waves 1-7), Additional Files. 2018.
Liu R, Dunn S, Grobler A, Lange K, Becker D, Goldsmith G, et al. Carotid artery intima-media thickness, distensibility, and elasticity: population epidemiology and concordance in Australian 11–12 year old Australians and their parents. BMJ Open 2019; e020264.
Stein JH, Korcarz CE, Hurst RT, Lonn E, Kendall CB, Mohler ER< ET-AL>. Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: a consensus statement from the American Society of Echocardiography Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Task Force endorsed by the Society for Vascular Medicine. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21:93–111.
Doyon A, Kracht D, Bayazit AK, Deveci M, Duzova A, Krmar RT< ET-AL>. 4C Study Consortium. Carotid artery intima-media thickness and distensibility in children and adolescents: reference values and role of body dimensions. Hypertens 2013; 62:550–556.
Van Bortel LM, Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Chowienczyk P, Cruickshank JK, De Backer T, et al. Artery Society; European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Vascular Structure and Function; European Network for Noninvasive Investigation of Large Arteries. Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens 2012; 30:445–448.
Clifford SA, Davies S, Wake M. Child Health CheckPoint Team. Child Health CheckPoint: cohort summary and methodology of a physical health and biospecimen module for the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. BMJ Open 2019; 9: (Suppl 3): 3–22.
World Health Organization. global database on body mass index; 2010. Global Database on Body Mass Index. 2016.
Statistics. ABo. Census of population and housing: socie-economics indexes for area (SEIFA). 2011Cat. No. 2033.0.55.001. 2011.
Würtz P, Kangas AJ, Soininen P, Lawlor DA, Davey Smith G, Ala-Korpela M. Quantitative serum nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics in large-scale epidemiology: a primer on-omic technologies. Am J Epidemiol 2017; 186:1084–1096.
Yusuf S, Reddy S, Ôunpuu S, Anand S. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: part I: general considerations, the epidemiologic transition, risk factors, and impact of urbanization. Circulation 2001; 104:2746–2753.
Townsend RR, Wilkinson IB, Schiffrin EL, Avolio AP, Chirinos JA, Cockcroft JR, et al. American Heart Association Council on Hypertension. Recommendations for improving and standardizing vascular research on arterial stiffness: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertens 2015; 66:698–722.
Peng X, Schultz MG, Picone DS, Black JA, Dwyer N, Roberts-Thomson P, et al. Arterial reservoir characteristics and central-to-peripheral blood pressure amplification in the human upper limb. J Hypertens 2017; 35:1825–1831.
Peng X. Non-invasive reservoir pressure parameters: measurement and clinical relevance. Unpublished doctoral thesis. 2019.
Ye C, Pan Y, Xu X, Su S, Snieder H, Treiber F, et al. Pulse wave velocity in elastic and muscular arteries: tracking stability and association with anthropometric and hemodynamic measurements. Hypertens Res 2016; 39:786–791.
Reference Values for Arterial Stiffness’ Collaboration. Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors:‘establishing normal and reference values’. Eur Heart J 2010; 31:2338–2350.
Rigotti NA, Clair C. Managing tobacco use: the neglected cardiovascular disease risk factor. Eur Heart J 2013; 34:3259–3267.
Aguado-Sierra J, Davies JE, Hadjiloizou N, Francis D, Mayet J, Hughes AD, Parker KH. Reservoir-wave separation and wave intensity analysis applied to carotid arteries: a hybrid 1D model to understand haemodynamics. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008; 2008:1381–1384.