Birth, attitudes and placentophagy: a thematic discourse analysis of discussions on UK parenting forums.
Birth
Discourse analysis
Medicalisation
Netnography
Placenta
Placentophagy
Pregnancy
Thematic analysis
Journal
BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Mar 2020
06 Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
17
09
2018
accepted:
19
02
2020
entrez:
7
3
2020
pubmed:
7
3
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The post-partum consumption of the placenta by the mother (placentophagy) has been practiced since the 1970s in the global North and is seemingly increasing in popularity. Maternal placentophagy is not known to have been practiced in any other time period or culture, despite being near-ubiquitous in other placental mammals. An in-depth qualitative exploration as to the reasons for the practice, its increasing popularity and how it is narratively incorporated into discourses surrounding "ideal" natural and medical births are given in this paper. 1752 posts from 956 users across 85 threads from the parenting forums Mumsnet and Netmums were identified for inclusion. A thematic discourse analysis was performed using NVivo. Three main themes were identified: women recounted predominantly positive attitudes towards their own experiences of placentophagy, and they were respectful of others' views and experiences; some had negative views, particularly around the concept of disgust, but again, they were respectful of others' experiences. By far the most common method of consumption of the placenta was encapsulation. This paper identifies the motivation for placentophagy to almost universally be for medical benefits, most commonly the prevention or treatment of post-natal depression (PND). Whilst disgust is a common reaction, discussion of risks is rare, and positive experiences outweigh negative ones. The increasing popularity of the practice is ascribed in part to the comparative palatability of encapsulation and the use of the internet to share resources and remove barriers. Parenting forums are important spaces to negotiate normative birth practices, including placentophagy, and act to build communities of women who value personal experience over medical evidence and highly value personal choice and bodily autonomy. Placentophagy is discussed in terms of its relation to natural and medical births with arguments being made using both discourses for and against the practice. This paper argues that placentophagy is practiced as a resistance to medicalisation as an assertion of control by the mother, whilst simultaneously being a medicalised phenomenon itself.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The post-partum consumption of the placenta by the mother (placentophagy) has been practiced since the 1970s in the global North and is seemingly increasing in popularity. Maternal placentophagy is not known to have been practiced in any other time period or culture, despite being near-ubiquitous in other placental mammals. An in-depth qualitative exploration as to the reasons for the practice, its increasing popularity and how it is narratively incorporated into discourses surrounding "ideal" natural and medical births are given in this paper.
METHODS
METHODS
1752 posts from 956 users across 85 threads from the parenting forums Mumsnet and Netmums were identified for inclusion. A thematic discourse analysis was performed using NVivo.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Three main themes were identified: women recounted predominantly positive attitudes towards their own experiences of placentophagy, and they were respectful of others' views and experiences; some had negative views, particularly around the concept of disgust, but again, they were respectful of others' experiences. By far the most common method of consumption of the placenta was encapsulation.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This paper identifies the motivation for placentophagy to almost universally be for medical benefits, most commonly the prevention or treatment of post-natal depression (PND). Whilst disgust is a common reaction, discussion of risks is rare, and positive experiences outweigh negative ones. The increasing popularity of the practice is ascribed in part to the comparative palatability of encapsulation and the use of the internet to share resources and remove barriers. Parenting forums are important spaces to negotiate normative birth practices, including placentophagy, and act to build communities of women who value personal experience over medical evidence and highly value personal choice and bodily autonomy. Placentophagy is discussed in terms of its relation to natural and medical births with arguments being made using both discourses for and against the practice. This paper argues that placentophagy is practiced as a resistance to medicalisation as an assertion of control by the mother, whilst simultaneously being a medicalised phenomenon itself.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32138706
doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2824-3
pii: 10.1186/s12884-020-2824-3
pmc: PMC7059278
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
134Références
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jul;23(5):574-91
pubmed: 25414923
Placenta. 2016 Jul;43:86-9
pubmed: 27324105
Ecol Food Nutr. 2012;51(3):198-217
pubmed: 22632060
Women Birth. 2018 Aug;31(4):e245-e257
pubmed: 29174274
Nutr Res. 2016 Aug;36(8):872-8
pubmed: 27440542
Birth. 2018 Dec;45(4):459-468
pubmed: 29722066
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2016 Jan-Feb;45(1):78-89
pubmed: 26815801
Community Pract. 2006 Feb;79(2):44-5
pubmed: 16493975
Placenta. 2018 Jul;67:8-14
pubmed: 29941176
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017 Jan;62(1):68-79
pubmed: 27809380
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019 Jul;64(4):443-450
pubmed: 30887687
Ecol Food Nutr. 2010 Nov-Dec;49(6):467-84
pubmed: 21888574
Ecol Food Nutr. 2012;51(3):177-97
pubmed: 22632059
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Jun 30;66(25):677-678
pubmed: 28662016
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015 Jul-Aug;60(4):371-9
pubmed: 26255799
Qual Health Res. 2010 May;20(5):595-606
pubmed: 20008955
Soc Policy. 1983 Summer;14(1):3-18
pubmed: 10264493
Women Birth. 2018 Aug;31(4):e258-e271
pubmed: 29174273
Midwives Chron. 1984 Nov;97(1162):375-6
pubmed: 6569318
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;218(4):401.e1-401.e11
pubmed: 28859955
Health Care Women Int. 2014 Feb;35(2):113-9
pubmed: 23862735
Med Anthropol Q. 2006 Jun;20(2):235-56
pubmed: 16770912
Ecol Food Nutr. 2013;52(2):93-115
pubmed: 23445390
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Apr;52(7):1109-21
pubmed: 11266053
Br J Soc Psychol. 2016 Sep;55(3):484-98
pubmed: 26916617
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Mar;64(620):e178-80
pubmed: 24567657
J Perinat Educ. 2014 Winter;23(1):41-9
pubmed: 24453467