Acute superior mesenteric venous thrombosis results in high rates of readmission and morbidity.
Abdominal Pain
/ diagnosis
Acute Disease
Adult
Aged
Anticoagulants
/ adverse effects
Digestive System Surgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Endovascular Procedures
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Male
Mesenteric Ischemia
/ diagnostic imaging
Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion
/ diagnostic imaging
Mesenteric Veins
/ diagnostic imaging
Middle Aged
Patient Readmission
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Splanchnic Circulation
Thrombophilia
/ genetics
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Venous Thrombosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Hypercoagulable disorder
Mesenteric ischemia
Mesenteric venous thrombosis
Journal
Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders
ISSN: 2213-3348
Titre abrégé: J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101607771
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
received:
11
11
2019
accepted:
13
01
2020
pubmed:
7
3
2020
medline:
22
12
2020
entrez:
7
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Superior mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) is a poorly understood clinical entity, and as such, outcomes are poorly described. This study aimed to identify predictors of bowel ischemia after MVT and to compare outcomes for patients treated medically (group 1) with those for patients treated with bowel resection (group 2). This was a retrospective, single-institution study capturing all patients diagnosed with symptomatic acute MVT on computed tomography imaging from 2008 to 2018. Demographics, comorbidities, imaging, laboratory values, and treatment were included. Predictors of bowel resection were analyzed by univariate and multivariate statistics. Outcomes including mortality, readmissions for abdominal pain, and chronic mesenteric venous congestion were compared using χ There were 121 patients included in the study; 98 patients were treated medically (group 1), 19 patients were treated with bowel resection (group 2), and 4 patients were treated with endovascular recanalization (group 3). Group 1 and group 2 were compared directly. Patients requiring bowel resection tended to have higher body mass index (P = .051) and a hypercoagulable disorder (P = .003). Patients who required bowel resection were more likely to present with lactic acidosis (P < .001) and leukocytosis (P < .001) with bowel wall thickening on scan (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, a genetic thrombophilia was a strong predictor of bowel ischemia (odds ratio, 3.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-12.37). One-year mortality and readmission rates did not differ between groups. However, readmission rates for abdominal pain were high for both groups (group 1, 44.90%; group 2, 57.89%; P = .317), and a significant proportion of patients exhibited chronic mesenteric venous congestion on repeated scan (group 1, 42.86%; group 2, 47.37%; P = .104). A genetic hypercoagulable disorder is a predictor of bowel ischemia due to MVT. Regardless of treatment, outcomes after MVT are morbid, with high rates of readmission for abdominal pain. An alternative approach to treat these patients is needed, given the poor outcomes with current strategies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32139329
pii: S2213-333X(20)30088-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.01.007
pmc: PMC7434641
mid: NIHMS1578291
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
748-755Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : L30 AG064730
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL098036
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Mar;88(3):285-94
pubmed: 23489453
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Jan;41(1):59-63
pubmed: 15696045
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2019 Oct 22;15:449-461
pubmed: 31695400
Rofo. 2018 Aug;190(8):740-746
pubmed: 30045398
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov 21;19(43):7813-5
pubmed: 24282370
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2009 Dec;20(8):722-5
pubmed: 19734780
Thromb Haemost. 2009 Sep;102(3):501-4
pubmed: 19718470
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005 May;16(5):651-61
pubmed: 15872320
Circulation. 2015 May 5;131(18):1599-603
pubmed: 25940967
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jul;17(7):566-77
pubmed: 25739990
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2016 Oct;4(4):501-7
pubmed: 27639007
Surg Clin North Am. 1997 Apr;77(2):327-38
pubmed: 9146716
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015 Feb;38(1):88-99
pubmed: 24934733
J Vasc Surg. 2001 Oct;34(4):680-4
pubmed: 11668324
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Aug;35:88-97
pubmed: 27263813
Vascul Pharmacol. 2019 Feb;113:86-91
pubmed: 29886103
Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Jan;93(1):40-47
pubmed: 29217335
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Sep;175(9):1474-80
pubmed: 26168152
Br J Surg. 2008 Oct;95(10):1245-51
pubmed: 18720461
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2016 Oct;4(4):400-6
pubmed: 27638992
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017 Sep;5(5):638-646
pubmed: 28818214
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Jun;98(6):1299-304
pubmed: 12818273
N Engl J Med. 1999 Sep 9;341(11):801-6
pubmed: 10477778
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2008 Jun-Jul;42(3):217-24
pubmed: 18332399
Thromb Res. 2010 Oct;126(4):295-8
pubmed: 20097408