How can health economics be used in the design and analysis of adaptive clinical trials? A qualitative analysis.


Journal

Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Mar 2020
Historique:
received: 04 08 2019
accepted: 04 02 2020
entrez: 8 3 2020
pubmed: 8 3 2020
medline: 29 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Adaptive designs offer a flexible approach, allowing changes to a trial based on examinations of the data as it progresses. Adaptive clinical trials are becoming a popular choice, as the prudent use of finite research budgets and accurate decision-making are priorities for healthcare providers around the world. The methods of health economics, which aim to maximise the health gained for money spent, could be incorporated into the design and analysis of adaptive clinical trials to make them more efficient. We aimed to understand the perspectives of stakeholders in health technology assessments to inform recommendations for the use of health economics in adaptive clinical trials. A qualitative study explored the attitudes of key stakeholders-including researchers, decision-makers and members of the public-towards the use of health economics in the design and analysis of adaptive clinical trials. Data were collected using interviews and focus groups (29 participants). A framework analysis was used to identify themes in the transcripts. It was considered that answering the clinical research question should be the priority in a clinical trial, notwithstanding the importance of cost-effectiveness for decision-making. Concerns raised by participants included handling the volatile nature of cost data at interim analyses; implementing this approach in global trials; resourcing adaptive trials which are designed and adapted based on health economic outcomes; and training stakeholders in these methods so that they can be implemented and appropriately interpreted. The use of health economics in the design and analysis of adaptive clinical trials has the potential to increase the efficiency of health technology assessments worldwide. Recommendations are made concerning the development of methods allowing the use of health economics in adaptive clinical trials, and suggestions are given to facilitate their implementation in practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32143728
doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4137-2
pii: 10.1186/s13063-020-4137-2
pmc: PMC7060544
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

252

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : DRF-2015-08-013
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Research Trainees Coordinating Centre
ID : DRF-2015-08-013

Références

Stat Methods Med Res. 2004 Apr;13(2):157-76
pubmed: 15068259
Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(23):iii, 1-125
pubmed: 14499052
Psychol Health. 2010 Dec;25(10):1229-45
pubmed: 20204937
J Biopharm Stat. 2012;22(4):853-67
pubmed: 22651119
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Clin Trials. 2005;2(3):197-205; discussion 205-8
pubmed: 16279143
Ann Oncol. 2008 Jul;19(7):1347-53
pubmed: 18304961
J Med Ethics. 1992 Mar;18(1):7-11
pubmed: 1573655
Med Care. 1994 Feb;32(2):150-63
pubmed: 8302107
Med Decis Making. 2015 Jul;35(5):570-83
pubmed: 25810269
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008 May 02;3:11
pubmed: 18454853
Trials. 2016 Jul 29;17:373
pubmed: 27473126
BMC Med. 2018 Feb 28;16(1):29
pubmed: 29490655
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 10;8(2):e018320
pubmed: 29440155
Value Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;13(2):242-50
pubmed: 19818058
Trials. 2016 Mar 19;17(1):150
pubmed: 26993469
Lancet. 2005 Feb 19-25;365(9460):711-22
pubmed: 15721478
Value Health. 2019 Apr;22(4):391-398
pubmed: 30975389
Drug Discov Today. 2004 Apr 15;9(8):351-7
pubmed: 15081962
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Mar 11;11:26
pubmed: 21396104
Clin Trials. 2014 Dec;11(6):648-56
pubmed: 25084784
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014 Dec;30(6):553-70
pubmed: 25816821
Med Decis Making. 1998 Apr-Jun;18(2 Suppl):S81-92
pubmed: 9566469
Radiology. 2008 Feb;246(2):420-5
pubmed: 18227539
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 May 03;16:27
pubmed: 25933921
BMC Med. 2018 Nov 16;16(1):210
pubmed: 30442137
Clin Trials. 2013 Feb;10(1):43-53
pubmed: 23231969
Trials. 2015 Sep 28;16:430
pubmed: 26416387
BMJ. 2000 Dec 2;321(7273):1362-3
pubmed: 11099268
Value Health. 2014 Jun;17(4):471-5
pubmed: 24969009

Auteurs

Laura Flight (L)

School of Health And Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. l.flight@sheffield.ac.uk.

Steven Julious (S)

School of Health And Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Alan Brennan (A)

School of Health And Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Susan Todd (S)

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Reading, Reading, UK.

Daniel Hind (D)

School of Health And Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH