Treatment strategies for recurrent ovarian cancer in older adult patients in Japan: a study based on real-world data.
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Carboplatin
/ administration & dosage
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
/ drug therapy
Deoxycytidine
/ administration & dosage
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
Evidence-Based Medicine
Female
Humans
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ drug therapy
Organoplatinum Compounds
/ pharmacology
Ovarian Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Paclitaxel
/ administration & dosage
Survival Rate
Gemcitabine
Aged
Decision making
Ovarian neoplasms
Platinum
Journal
Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology
ISSN: 1432-1335
Titre abrégé: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7902060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
received:
30
01
2020
accepted:
23
02
2020
pubmed:
8
3
2020
medline:
18
4
2020
entrez:
8
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Elderly patients with cancer are often at risk for undertreatment because of frailty, an aging-specific problem. However, current real-world conditions of recurrent ovarian cancer treatment in elderly patients remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify treatment patterns in elderly patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. We used an ovarian cancer database containing the diagnosis and initial therapy of all patients at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan from 2007 to 2014. Patients were stratified into the platinum-sensitive group and the platinum-resistant group. We retrospectively assessed chemotherapy use in patients aged ≤ 64, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, and ≥ 80 years. Among 253 patients (sensitive group: 135; resistant group: 118), by age group 91%, 95%, 100%, 100%, and 100% received chemotherapy in the sensitive group, and 79%, 67%, 50%, 29%, 0% received chemotherapy in the resistant group, respectively. In the resistant group, the percentage of patients aged 70-74 or 75-79 years who received chemotherapy was significantly lower than the percentage among patients aged ≤ 64 years, respectively (p = 0.01, p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 70 years (odds ratio [OR], 4.412; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.628-11.959; p = 0.004) and platinum-free interval < 3 months (OR, 3.434; 95% CI, 1.401-8.399; p = 0.007) were inversely associated with chemotherapy use. Doctors and patients did not consider chemotherapy in patients aged ≥ 70 years with platinum-resistant disease. Older age was independently and inversely associated with chemotherapy use in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Our results highlight the importance of demographic information in clinical decision-making for elderly patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
Elderly patients with cancer are often at risk for undertreatment because of frailty, an aging-specific problem. However, current real-world conditions of recurrent ovarian cancer treatment in elderly patients remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify treatment patterns in elderly patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
METHODS
We used an ovarian cancer database containing the diagnosis and initial therapy of all patients at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan from 2007 to 2014. Patients were stratified into the platinum-sensitive group and the platinum-resistant group. We retrospectively assessed chemotherapy use in patients aged ≤ 64, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79, and ≥ 80 years.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among 253 patients (sensitive group: 135; resistant group: 118), by age group 91%, 95%, 100%, 100%, and 100% received chemotherapy in the sensitive group, and 79%, 67%, 50%, 29%, 0% received chemotherapy in the resistant group, respectively. In the resistant group, the percentage of patients aged 70-74 or 75-79 years who received chemotherapy was significantly lower than the percentage among patients aged ≤ 64 years, respectively (p = 0.01, p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 70 years (odds ratio [OR], 4.412; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.628-11.959; p = 0.004) and platinum-free interval < 3 months (OR, 3.434; 95% CI, 1.401-8.399; p = 0.007) were inversely associated with chemotherapy use.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Doctors and patients did not consider chemotherapy in patients aged ≥ 70 years with platinum-resistant disease. Older age was independently and inversely associated with chemotherapy use in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Our results highlight the importance of demographic information in clinical decision-making for elderly patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32144536
doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03168-z
pii: 10.1007/s00432-020-03168-z
doi:
Substances chimiques
Organoplatinum Compounds
0
Deoxycytidine
0W860991D6
Carboplatin
BG3F62OND5
Paclitaxel
P88XT4IS4D
Gemcitabine
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1335-1341Références
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Apr;97(1):104-9
pubmed: 15790445
J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 1;32(13):1302-8
pubmed: 24637997
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jan;148(1):36-41
pubmed: 29107348
Ann Oncol. 2013 Nov;24(11):2808-13
pubmed: 24061628
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Mar;154(3):639-47
pubmed: 3953714
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008 Jun;66(3):229-36
pubmed: 18243011
Surg Oncol. 2004 Dec;13(4):181-6
pubmed: 15615654
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;55(1):114-30
pubmed: 22343233
N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 29;365(26):2484-96
pubmed: 22204725
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jun;133(3):624-31
pubmed: 24607285
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Apr;15(4):396-405
pubmed: 24582486
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 15;21(8):1618-23
pubmed: 12697888
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Oct;147(1):104-109
pubmed: 28734497
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Nov 15;22(22):4626-31
pubmed: 15542812
Br J Cancer. 2012 Aug 7;107(4):588-91
pubmed: 22836511
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2019 Jul;84(1):33-39
pubmed: 30982097
Lancet. 2009 Oct 17;374(9698):1331-8
pubmed: 19767092
Lancet. 2003 Jun 21;361(9375):2099-106
pubmed: 12826431
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):779-791
pubmed: 28438473
N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 29;365(26):2473-83
pubmed: 22204724
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 May;149(2):270-274
pubmed: 29514738
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 10;30(17):2039-45
pubmed: 22529265
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 20;26(6):890-6
pubmed: 18281662
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 May;21(4):750-5
pubmed: 21543936
BMC Cancer. 2015 Nov 26;15:937
pubmed: 26610814