Association Between Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade Discontinuation and All-Cause Mortality Among Persons With Low Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
/ administration & dosage
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Coronary Artery Disease
/ drug therapy
Female
Glomerular Filtration Rate
/ drug effects
Heart Failure
/ drug therapy
Humans
Hypertension
/ drug therapy
Kidney Failure, Chronic
/ chemically induced
Male
Middle Aged
Propensity Score
Renin-Angiotensin System
/ drug effects
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Journal
JAMA internal medicine
ISSN: 2168-6114
Titre abrégé: JAMA Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589534
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2020
01 05 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
10
3
2020
medline:
21
1
2021
entrez:
10
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It is uncertain whether and when angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) and angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) treatment should be discontinued in individuals with low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). To investigate the association of ACE-I or ARB therapy discontinuation after eGFR decreases to below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 with the risk of mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). This retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study included 3909 patients from an integrated health care system that served rural areas of central and northeastern Pennsylvania. Patients who initiated ACE-I or ARB therapy from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2018, and had an eGFR decrease to below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 during therapy were enrolled, with follow-up until January 25, 2019. Individuals were classified based on whether they discontinued ACE-I or ARB therapy within 6 months after an eGFR decrease to below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. The association between ACE-I or ARB therapy discontinuation and mortality during the subsequent 5 years was assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models, adjusting for patient characteristics at the time of the eGFR decrease in a propensity score-matched sample. Secondary outcomes included MACE and ESKD. Of the 3909 individuals receiving ACE-I or ARB treatment who experienced an eGFR decrease to below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (2406 [61.6%] female; mean [SD] age, 73.7 [12.6] years), 1235 discontinued ACE-I or ARB therapy within 6 months after the eGFR decrease and 2674 did not discontinue therapy. A total of 434 patients (35.1%) who discontinued ACE-I or ARB therapy and 786 (29.4%) who did not discontinue therapy died during a median follow-up of 2.9 years (interquartile range, 1.3-5.0 years). In the propensity score-matched sample of 2410 individuals, ACE-I or ARB therapy discontinuation was associated with a higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.20-1.60]) and MACE (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.20-1.56), but no statistically significant difference in the risk of ESKD was found (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.86-1.65). The findings suggest that continuing ACE-I or ARB therapy in patients with declining kidney function may be associated with cardiovascular benefit without excessive harm of ESKD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32150237
pii: 2762699
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0193
pmc: PMC7063544
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
0
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
718-726Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : K01 DK121825
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK115534
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK100446
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2016 Dec;69(12):1167
pubmed: 27894487
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107
pubmed: 19757444
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001 Dec;12(12):2832-7
pubmed: 11729254
N Engl J Med. 2001 Sep 20;345(12):851-60
pubmed: 11565517
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 12;354(2):131-40
pubmed: 16407508
Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 May;67(5):728-41
pubmed: 26597926
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016 Feb;31(2):255-61
pubmed: 26429974
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):63-70
pubmed: 28822996
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010 Dec;25(12):3977-82
pubmed: 19820248
Ann Intern Med. 2009 May 5;150(9):604-12
pubmed: 19414839
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 15;71(19):e127-e248
pubmed: 29146535
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Aug 7;13(8):1144-1152
pubmed: 30002224
Am J Nephrol. 2000 Jul-Aug;20(4):268-72
pubmed: 10970978
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;84(10):2365-2372
pubmed: 29943849
Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Nov;94(11):2220-2229
pubmed: 31619367
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jul 2;8(13):e011822
pubmed: 31256702
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Dec 1;45(6):2038-2049
pubmed: 26721599
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 06;8(11):e78465
pubmed: 24223154
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 25;63(7):650-658
pubmed: 24269363
Perspect Clin Res. 2011 Jul;2(3):109-12
pubmed: 21897887
JAMA. 2001 Jun 6;285(21):2719-28
pubmed: 11386927
J Hypertens. 2001 Oct;19(10):1871-6
pubmed: 11593109
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2010 Aug;24(4):331-9
pubmed: 20577898
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Jan;75(1):84-104
pubmed: 31473020
Prev Sci. 2013 Dec;14(6):570-80
pubmed: 23408282
Biometrics. 1996 Mar;52(1):249-64
pubmed: 8934595
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004 Dec;15(12):3117-25
pubmed: 15579515