Identifying risk factors for suboptimal pelvic binder placement in major trauma.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Databases, Factual
Female
Fracture Fixation
/ instrumentation
Humans
Injury Severity Score
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Orthopedic Fixation Devices
/ statistics & numerical data
Pelvic Bones
/ diagnostic imaging
Queensland
Radiography
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
/ methods
Trauma Centers
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Pelvic binder
Pelvic circumferential compression device
Pelvic fracture
Pelvic stabilisation
Resuscitation
Trauma
Journal
Injury
ISSN: 1879-0267
Titre abrégé: Injury
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0226040
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
10
08
2019
revised:
06
02
2020
accepted:
19
02
2020
pubmed:
11
3
2020
medline:
7
2
2021
entrez:
11
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to identify the frequency of sub-optimal pelvic binder placement at a tertiary-level trauma centre, produce a reproducible, quantitative measure of pelvic binder fit, and identify risk factors for sub-optimal placement. We identified all consecutive patients who had a pelvic binder in place on arrival to the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital in Queensland, Australia from 2012-2016. The X-Rays were reviewed by two senior clinicians for position and measured for degree of displacement if not optimally placed between the greater and lesser trochanters. Risk factors for sub-optimal position of the binder were assessed using multiple logistic regression with inclusion of all variables that had a statistical association (to p<0.05) at the univariate analysis stage. Secondary assessment was conducted of patients who had undergone CT imaging for subcutaneous body fat distribution. In total, 496 X-Rays were assessed for pelvic binder fit, finding 43.5% sub-optimally placed. 39.7% binders were superior to the greater trochanter line and 3.8% inferiorly placed below the lesser trochanter line. The majority of the sub-optimally placed binders were within 60 mm of the ideal position. Female patients had a greater risk of sub-optimal binder placement compared to males (62.5% vs 37%). Increasing intertrochanteric height was found to be protective for ideal binder placement with an aOR 0.62 for each cm in increased height. There was no association with sub-optimal placement and age, sex, mechanism of trauma, injury severity score, number of body regions injured or Glasgow Coma Scale. There was strong kappa agreement between the X-Ray assessors for binder position assessment on the plain radiological imaging. Sub-optimal positioning of pelvic binders is common in our trauma population. This study has described the risk factors associated with higher rates of sub-optimal fit and provides a description of rapid radiological assessment for optimal fit for the bedside clinician caring for injured patients in the resuscitation room.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32151420
pii: S0020-1383(20)30174-1
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.099
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
971-977Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest We wish to confirm that the authors of ‘Identifying Risk Factors for Suboptimal Pelvic Binder Placement in Major Trauma’ have no conflict of interest to declare in the submission to Injury.