Unique and highly specific cyanogenic glycoside localization in stigmatic cells and pollen in the genus Lomatia (Proteaceae).

Apparency theory MALDI chemical defence cyanogenesis florivory mass spectrometry imaging optimal allocation pollinator spatial metabolomics

Journal

Annals of botany
ISSN: 1095-8290
Titre abrégé: Ann Bot
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372347

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 08 2020
Historique:
received: 26 09 2019
accepted: 06 03 2020
pubmed: 12 3 2020
medline: 3 10 2020
entrez: 12 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Floral chemical defence strategies remain understudied despite the significance of flowers to plant fitness, and the fact that many flowers contain secondary metabolites that confer resistance to herbivores. Optimal defence and apparency theories predict that the most apparent plant parts and/or those most important to fitness should be most defended. To test whether within-flower distributions of chemical defence are consistent with these theories we used cyanogenic glycosides (CNglycs), which are constitutive defence metabolites that deter herbivores by releasing hydrogen cyanide upon hydrolysis. We used cyanogenic florets of the genus Lomatia to investigate at what scale there may be strategic allocation of CNglycs in flowers, what their localization reveals about function, and whether levels of floral CNglycs differ between eight congeneric species across a climatic gradient. Within-flower distributions of CNglycs during development were quantified, CNglycs were identified and their localization was visualized in cryosectioned florets using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI). Florets of all congeneric species studied were cyanogenic, and concentrations differed between species. Within florets there was substantial variation in CNglyc concentrations, with extremely high concentrations (up to 14.6 mg CN g-1 d. wt) in pollen and loose, specialized surface cells on the pollen presenter, among the highest concentrations reported in plant tissues. Two tyrosine-derived CNglycs, the monoglycoside dhurrin and diglycoside proteacin, were identified. MALDI-MSI revealed their varying ratios in different floral tissues; proteacin was primarily localized to anthers and ovules, and dhurrin to specialized cells on the pollen presenter. The mix of transient specialized cells and pollen of L. fraxinifolia was ~11 % dhurrin and ~1.1 % proteacin by mass. Tissue-specific distributions of two CNglycs and substantial variation in their concentrations within florets suggests their allocation is under strong selection. Localized, high CNglyc concentrations in transient cells challenge the predictions of defence theories, and highlight the importance of fine-scale metabolite visualization, and the need for further investigation into the ecological and metabolic roles of CNglycs in floral tissues.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Floral chemical defence strategies remain understudied despite the significance of flowers to plant fitness, and the fact that many flowers contain secondary metabolites that confer resistance to herbivores. Optimal defence and apparency theories predict that the most apparent plant parts and/or those most important to fitness should be most defended. To test whether within-flower distributions of chemical defence are consistent with these theories we used cyanogenic glycosides (CNglycs), which are constitutive defence metabolites that deter herbivores by releasing hydrogen cyanide upon hydrolysis.
METHODS
We used cyanogenic florets of the genus Lomatia to investigate at what scale there may be strategic allocation of CNglycs in flowers, what their localization reveals about function, and whether levels of floral CNglycs differ between eight congeneric species across a climatic gradient. Within-flower distributions of CNglycs during development were quantified, CNglycs were identified and their localization was visualized in cryosectioned florets using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI).
KEY RESULTS
Florets of all congeneric species studied were cyanogenic, and concentrations differed between species. Within florets there was substantial variation in CNglyc concentrations, with extremely high concentrations (up to 14.6 mg CN g-1 d. wt) in pollen and loose, specialized surface cells on the pollen presenter, among the highest concentrations reported in plant tissues. Two tyrosine-derived CNglycs, the monoglycoside dhurrin and diglycoside proteacin, were identified. MALDI-MSI revealed their varying ratios in different floral tissues; proteacin was primarily localized to anthers and ovules, and dhurrin to specialized cells on the pollen presenter. The mix of transient specialized cells and pollen of L. fraxinifolia was ~11 % dhurrin and ~1.1 % proteacin by mass.
CONCLUSIONS
Tissue-specific distributions of two CNglycs and substantial variation in their concentrations within florets suggests their allocation is under strong selection. Localized, high CNglyc concentrations in transient cells challenge the predictions of defence theories, and highlight the importance of fine-scale metabolite visualization, and the need for further investigation into the ecological and metabolic roles of CNglycs in floral tissues.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32157299
pii: 5802779
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa038
pmc: PMC7424758
doi:

Substances chimiques

Glycosides 0
cyanogenic glycosides 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

387-400

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Références

Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010 Jun;13(3):338-47
pubmed: 20197238
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018 Aug 1;94(8):
pubmed: 29878113
Ann Bot. 2006 Jun;97(6):1017-44
pubmed: 16520340
BMC Genomics. 2016 Dec 13;17(1):1021
pubmed: 27964718
Ann Bot. 2012 Dec;110(8):1503-14
pubmed: 23022676
Plant Cell Physiol. 2013 Jun;54(6):817-26
pubmed: 23612932
Plant Physiol. 1989 Aug;90(4):1552-9
pubmed: 16666964
Plant J. 2018 Jun;94(6):1109-1125
pubmed: 29659075
Phytochemistry. 2013 Sep;93:210-5
pubmed: 23566716
Phytochem Rev. 2011 Mar;10(1):127-136
pubmed: 21475390
Phytochemistry. 2008 Jun;69(9):1795-813
pubmed: 18472115
BMC Genomics. 2016 Nov 17;17(1):937
pubmed: 27855648
J Exp Bot. 2008;59(8):2241-51
pubmed: 18448476
New Phytol. 2009;182(1):251-60
pubmed: 19076293
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jul 17;8:1233
pubmed: 28769948
Tree Physiol. 2000 May;20(9):591-598
pubmed: 12651423
Biochem J. 2015 Aug 1;469(3):375-89
pubmed: 26205491
Phytochemistry. 2011 Dec;72(18):2325-34
pubmed: 21945721
J Exp Biol. 2014 May 1;217(Pt 9):1620-5
pubmed: 24526720
J Chem Ecol. 1991 Jan;17(1):195-205
pubmed: 24258445
Plant Physiol. 2008 Mar;146(3):1040-52
pubmed: 18192442
Am Nat. 2000 Jul;156(1):92-99
pubmed: 10824024
Funct Plant Biol. 2004 Jun;31(5):491-503
pubmed: 32688921
Plant Physiol. 1990 Sep;94(1):28-34
pubmed: 16667698
Phytochemistry. 2006 Jan;67(1):43-51
pubmed: 16307763
Metabolomics. 2018;14(5):63
pubmed: 29681790
Q Rev Biol. 2003 Mar;78(1):23-55
pubmed: 12661508
J Agric Food Chem. 2005 Feb 9;53(3):594-600
pubmed: 15686407
Metabolites. 2014 Sep 30;4(4):889-920
pubmed: 25271355
J Nat Prod. 2015 Jun 26;78(6):1231-42
pubmed: 25981198
New Phytol. 2020 Feb;225(3):1053-1064
pubmed: 31569278
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2014;65:155-85
pubmed: 24579992
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jan 3;92(1):2-8
pubmed: 7816816
Plant Mol Biol. 2015 Sep;89(1-2):21-34
pubmed: 26249044
BMC Plant Biol. 2016 Jan 28;16:32
pubmed: 26822555
Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1778:241-252
pubmed: 29761443
Front Plant Sci. 2017 May 19;8:800
pubmed: 28579996
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2010 Feb;54(2):292-300
pubmed: 20013884
J Chem Ecol. 2007 Apr;33(4):731-47
pubmed: 17334922
Science. 1985 Nov 22;230(4728):895-9
pubmed: 17739203
Plant Physiol. 2018 Nov;178(3):1081-1095
pubmed: 30297456
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2017 Jan;48(1):189-96
pubmed: 29644839
Ecol Lett. 2006 Dec;9(12):1351-65
pubmed: 17118009
Plant Physiol. 1994 Oct;106(2):437-445
pubmed: 12232341
J Chem Ecol. 2002 Jul;28(7):1301-13
pubmed: 12199497
Curr Biol. 2019 Apr 22;29(8):1401-1406.e4
pubmed: 30982649
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2008 Jun;46(5):437-42
pubmed: 18568799

Auteurs

Edita Ritmejerytė (E)

School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.
School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Berin A Boughton (BA)

School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Metabolomics Australia, School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Michael J Bayly (MJ)

School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Rebecca E Miller (RE)

School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.

Articles similaires

Glycine max Photoperiod Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases Flowers Gene Expression Regulation, Plant

Experimental elevated temperature affects bumblebee foraging and flight speed.

Maxence Gérard, Erika Gardelin, Philipp Lehmann et al.
1.00
Animals Bees Flight, Animal Feeding Behavior Flowers
Reproduction Flowers Seasons Fruit Climate Change

Classifications MeSH