Dispensation of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications in patients receiving opioid agonist therapy; a national prospective cohort study in Norway from 2015 to 2017.
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Centrally acting stimulants
Dispensed drugs
Hyperkinetic disorder
Opioid substitution treatment
Register data
Substance-related disorders
Journal
BMC psychiatry
ISSN: 1471-244X
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968559
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 03 2020
12 03 2020
Historique:
received:
30
08
2019
accepted:
03
03
2020
entrez:
14
3
2020
pubmed:
14
3
2020
medline:
27
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It is estimated that up to a third of patients on opioid agonist therapy (OAT) have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Treatment by ADHD medication, including a centrally acting stimulant (CAS) or atomoxetine is one of the essential approaches. This study evaluates the use of dispensed ADHD medications in the Norwegian OAT population in the period from 2015 to 2017. Types and doses of ADHD medications, co-dispensations of other potentially addictive drugs like benzodiazepines, z-hypnotics, gabapentinoids, and non-OAT opioids, as well as direct-acting antivirals (DAA) against hepatitis C infection, are investigated. Information about all dispensed ADHD medication, OAT opioids, and the defined potentially addictive drugs were recorded from the Norwegian Prescription Database. Dispensation rates, the types, and the doses of dispensed ADHD medications were estimated by summarizing the number of dispensations, and the dispensed doses. Logistic regression analyses were employed to assess the associations between ADHD medication, and OAT opioid use, and dispensations of other potentially addictive drugs and DAAs against hepatitis C infection. A total of 9235 OAT patients were included. The proportion of patients who were dispensed ADHD medication increased from 3.5 to 4.6% throughout the study period. The three most dispensed CAS were short- and intermediate-acting methylphenidate (55%), lisdexamphetamine (24%), and dexamphetamine (17%) in 2017. Buprenorphine, rather than methadone, as OAT opioid (adjusted odds ratio: 1.6, CI: 1.2-2.1) was associated with being dispensed ADHD medication. Among patients who received CAS and OAT opioids each calendar year, the dispensed doses of methylphenidate increased from 63 mg/day in 2015 to 76 mg/day in 2017 (p = 0.01). Sixty percent of patients receiving ADHD medications were also dispensed other addictive drugs concomitantly in 2017. Similar results were found in 2015 and 2016. Co-prescription of ADHD medications was low among patients on OAT in Norway, considering a high prevalence of ADHD in this patient group. On the other hand, concurrent dispensations of multiple addictive drugs were common in this population. Understanding the underlying reasons for such prescribing is essential, and research on how to optimize ADHD medication of patients with ADHD receiving OAT is needed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
It is estimated that up to a third of patients on opioid agonist therapy (OAT) have attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Treatment by ADHD medication, including a centrally acting stimulant (CAS) or atomoxetine is one of the essential approaches. This study evaluates the use of dispensed ADHD medications in the Norwegian OAT population in the period from 2015 to 2017. Types and doses of ADHD medications, co-dispensations of other potentially addictive drugs like benzodiazepines, z-hypnotics, gabapentinoids, and non-OAT opioids, as well as direct-acting antivirals (DAA) against hepatitis C infection, are investigated.
METHODS
Information about all dispensed ADHD medication, OAT opioids, and the defined potentially addictive drugs were recorded from the Norwegian Prescription Database. Dispensation rates, the types, and the doses of dispensed ADHD medications were estimated by summarizing the number of dispensations, and the dispensed doses. Logistic regression analyses were employed to assess the associations between ADHD medication, and OAT opioid use, and dispensations of other potentially addictive drugs and DAAs against hepatitis C infection.
RESULTS
A total of 9235 OAT patients were included. The proportion of patients who were dispensed ADHD medication increased from 3.5 to 4.6% throughout the study period. The three most dispensed CAS were short- and intermediate-acting methylphenidate (55%), lisdexamphetamine (24%), and dexamphetamine (17%) in 2017. Buprenorphine, rather than methadone, as OAT opioid (adjusted odds ratio: 1.6, CI: 1.2-2.1) was associated with being dispensed ADHD medication. Among patients who received CAS and OAT opioids each calendar year, the dispensed doses of methylphenidate increased from 63 mg/day in 2015 to 76 mg/day in 2017 (p = 0.01). Sixty percent of patients receiving ADHD medications were also dispensed other addictive drugs concomitantly in 2017. Similar results were found in 2015 and 2016.
CONCLUSION
Co-prescription of ADHD medications was low among patients on OAT in Norway, considering a high prevalence of ADHD in this patient group. On the other hand, concurrent dispensations of multiple addictive drugs were common in this population. Understanding the underlying reasons for such prescribing is essential, and research on how to optimize ADHD medication of patients with ADHD receiving OAT is needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32164615
doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02526-y
pii: 10.1186/s12888-020-02526-y
pmc: PMC7068965
doi:
Substances chimiques
Analgesics, Opioid
0
Antiviral Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
119Subventions
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 269855
Pays : International
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 269855
Pays : International
Références
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006 Feb 1;81(2):137-48
pubmed: 16102908
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Oct 8;90(2-3):203-9
pubmed: 17478058
J Dual Diagn. 2014;10(1):32-8
pubmed: 25392060
Addiction. 2014 Mar;109(3):440-9
pubmed: 24118269
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2017 Mar/Apr;25(2):50-64
pubmed: 28272130
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Dec;72(12):1507-1514
pubmed: 27586399
Eur Addict Res. 2014;20(2):59-65
pubmed: 24080771
J Atten Disord. 2015 Jul;19(7):630-40
pubmed: 23269194
CNS Drugs. 2016 Jul;30(7):647-54
pubmed: 27312320
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1999 Aug;187(8):487-95
pubmed: 10463066
Drugs. 2017 Mar;77(4):403-426
pubmed: 28144823
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Dec 1;193:131-136
pubmed: 30368067
Addiction. 2018 Aug;113(8):1461-1476
pubmed: 29672985
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 May 1;174:58-64
pubmed: 28315808
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Apr 1;122(1-2):11-9
pubmed: 22209385
Eur Addict Res. 2018;24(1):43-51
pubmed: 29510390
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001;251(1):42-7
pubmed: 11315518
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Apr 1;101(1-2):13-9
pubmed: 19081205
Brain Behav. 2012 Sep;2(5):661-77
pubmed: 23139911
Pain Med. 2014 Sep;15(9):1540-8
pubmed: 24703517
N Engl J Med. 2005 Nov 3;353(18):1945-54
pubmed: 16267325
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;72(6):593-602
pubmed: 25887096
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;5(9):727-738
pubmed: 30097390
Neuropsychol Rev. 2007 Sep;17(3):317-36
pubmed: 17690986
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2016 Jun;36(3):222-8
pubmed: 27043119
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Jan 1;134:158-166
pubmed: 24156882
Subst Use Misuse. 2012 Jun-Jul;47(8-9):1005-14
pubmed: 22676568