Combined continuous glucose monitoring and subcutaneous insulin infusion versus self-monitoring of blood glucose with optimized multiple injections in people with type 1 diabetes: A randomized crossover trial.


Journal

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism
ISSN: 1463-1326
Titre abrégé: Diabetes Obes Metab
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883645

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2020
Historique:
received: 30 01 2020
revised: 09 03 2020
accepted: 10 03 2020
pubmed: 14 3 2020
medline: 25 6 2021
entrez: 14 3 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To investigate the efficacy of a combination of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus an optimized degludec-based multiple daily injections (MDI) regimen + self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in people with type 1 diabetes with regard to optimizing glucose control. The trial included 28 individuals who underwent a 4-week run-in phase, and were then randomized 1:1 to: (a) CSII + CGM followed by MDI + SMBG or (b) an MDI basal-bolus regimen followed by CSII + CGM. In patients randomized to the CSII + CGM → MDI + SMBG arm, a significant reduction in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) versus baseline was found at the end of the first phase (CSII + CGM) without significant variation in the following MDI + SMBG phase. In the arm randomized to the MDI + SMBG → CSII + CGM sequence, a significant improvement in HbA1c was observed in the first phase (MDI + SMBG), together with a further decrease in the following CSII + CGM phase. In the comparison of the two treatments using a mixed linear model, CSII + CGM was superior to MDI + SMBG with respect to change in HbA1c (P = 0.001). This study suggests that CSII + CGM improves glycaemic control without relevant safety issues in type 1 diabetes, in comparison with MDI + SMBG.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32166907
doi: 10.1111/dom.14028
doi:

Substances chimiques

Blood Glucose 0
Glycated Hemoglobin A 0
Hypoglycemic Agents 0
Insulin 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1286-1291

Subventions

Organisme : This trial was financially supported by Movi SpA. The funding source had no advising role in trial design details and drafting of the report. The funding source had no role in the conduct of the analyses, interpretation of the data or in the decision to approve publication
Pays : International

Informations de copyright

© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Pala L, Dicembrini I, Mannucci E. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion vs modern multiple injection regimens in type 1 diabetes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Acta Diabetol. 2019;56(9):973-980.
Benkhadra K, Alahdab F, Tamhane S, et al. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2017 Mar;86(3):354-360.
Pickup JC, Freeman SC, Sutton AJ. Glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes during real time continuous glucose monitoring compared with self monitoring of blood glucose: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials using individual patient data. BMJ. 2011;343:d3805.
Battelino T, Conget I, Olsen B, et al. The use and efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes treated with insulin pump therapy: a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia. 2012 Dec;55(12):3155-3162.
Beck RW, Riddlesworth TD, Ruedy KJ, et al. Effect of initiating use of an insulin pump in adults with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily insulin injections and continuous glucose monitoring (DIAMOND): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(9):700-708.
Bergenstal RM, Tamborlane WV, Ahmann A, et al. Effectiveness of sensor-augmented insulin-pump therapy in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(4):311-320.
Hermanides J, Nørgaard K, Bruttomesso D, et al. Sensor-augmented pump therapy lowers HbA(1c) in suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes; a randomized controlled trial. Diabet Med. 2011;28(10):1158-1167.
Šoupal J, Petruželková L, Flekač M, et al. Comparison of different treatment modalities for type 1 diabetes, including sensor-augmented insulin regimens, in 52 weeks of follow-up: a COMISAIR study. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016;18(9):532-538.
Bergenstal RM, Bailey TS, Rodbard D, et al. Comparison of insulin glargine 300 units/mL and 100 units/mL in adults with type 1 diabetes: continuous glucose monitoring profiles and variability using morning or evening injections. Diabetes Care. 2017 Apr;40(4):554-560.
Birkeland KI, Home PD, Wendisch U, et al. Insulin Degludec in type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial of a new-generation ultra-long-acting insulin compared with insulin glargine. Diabetes Care. 2011 Mar;34(3):661-665.
Bradley C. The diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire: DTSQ. In: Bradley C, ed. Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: a Guide to Psychological Measurement in Diabetes Research and Practice. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1994:111-132.
Šoupal J, Petruželková L, Grunberger G, et al. Glycemic outcomes in adults with T1D are impacted more by continuous glucose monitoring than by insulin delivery method: 3 years of follow-up from the COMISAIR study. Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(1):37-43.
Hoogma RP, Hammond PJ, Gomis R, et al. Comparison of the effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and NPH-based multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) on glycaemic control and quality of life: results of the 5-nations trial. Diabet Med. 2006;23(2):141-147.
DeVries JH, Snoek FJ, Kostense PJ, Masurel N, Heine RJ, Dutch Insulin Pump Study Group. A randomized trial of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and intensive injection therapy in type 1 diabetes for patients with long-standing poor glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(11):2074-2080.
Hanaire-Broutin H, Melki V, Bessieres-Lacombe S, Tauber JP. Comparison of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injection regimens using insulin lispro in type 1 diabetic patients on intensified treatment. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(9):1232-1235.

Auteurs

Ilaria Dicembrini (I)

Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Laura Pala (L)

Diabetes Unit, Careggi Teaching Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Mariasmeralda Caliri (M)

Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Silvia Minardi (S)

Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Claudia Cosentino (C)

Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Matteo Monami (M)

Diabetes Unit, Careggi Teaching Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Edoardo Mannucci (E)

Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Diabetes Unit, Careggi Teaching Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH