A regional nuclear conflict would compromise global food security.
India–Pakistan conflict
cold temperature yield response
food system shock
global gridded crop model intercomparison (GGCMI)
multiple breadbasket failure
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 03 2020
31 03 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
18
3
2020
medline:
18
7
2020
entrez:
18
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A limited nuclear war between India and Pakistan could ignite fires large enough to emit more than 5 Tg of soot into the stratosphere. Climate model simulations have shown severe resulting climate perturbations with declines in global mean temperature by 1.8 °C and precipitation by 8%, for at least 5 y. Here we evaluate impacts for the global food system. Six harmonized state-of-the-art crop models show that global caloric production from maize, wheat, rice, and soybean falls by 13 (±1)%, 11 (±8)%, 3 (±5)%, and 17 (±2)% over 5 y. Total single-year losses of 12 (±4)% quadruple the largest observed historical anomaly and exceed impacts caused by historic droughts and volcanic eruptions. Colder temperatures drive losses more than changes in precipitation and solar radiation, leading to strongest impacts in temperate regions poleward of 30°N, including the United States, Europe, and China for 10 to 15 y. Integrated food trade network analyses show that domestic reserves and global trade can largely buffer the production anomaly in the first year. Persistent multiyear losses, however, would constrain domestic food availability and propagate to the Global South, especially to food-insecure countries. By year 5, maize and wheat availability would decrease by 13% globally and by more than 20% in 71 countries with a cumulative population of 1.3 billion people. In view of increasing instability in South Asia, this study shows that a regional conflict using <1% of the worldwide nuclear arsenal could have adverse consequences for global food security unmatched in modern history.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32179678
pii: 1919049117
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919049117
pmc: PMC7132296
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7071-7081Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interest.
Références
Popul Dev Rev. 2010;36(4):693-723
pubmed: 21174866
Nat Plants. 2016 Dec 12;3:16193
pubmed: 27941818
Nature. 2018 Aug;560(7719):480-483
pubmed: 30089909
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 8;105(14):5307-12
pubmed: 18391218
Nature. 2009 Apr 23;458(7241):1014-7
pubmed: 19396143
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 20;115(47):11935-11940
pubmed: 30397143
Science. 1983 Dec 23;222(4630):1283-92
pubmed: 17773320
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Mar;23(3):1258-1281
pubmed: 27387228
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 4;111(9):3268-73
pubmed: 24344314
Nat Commun. 2012;3:1293
pubmed: 23250423
Nature. 2019 Sep;573(7772):16-17
pubmed: 31481773
Sci Adv. 2019 Oct 02;5(10):eaay5478
pubmed: 31616796
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 17;111(24):8776-81
pubmed: 24872455
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 16;14(9):e0221862
pubmed: 31525247
Nat Commun. 2015 Nov 12;6:8946
pubmed: 26558436
Science. 1983 Dec 23;222(4630):1293-300
pubmed: 6658451
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 5;114(36):E7415-E7424
pubmed: 28827324
Science. 2019 Aug 9;365(6453):587-590
pubmed: 31395782
Science. 2007 Mar 2;315(5816):1224-5
pubmed: 17332396
New Phytol. 2013 Mar;197(4):1058-76
pubmed: 23363481
Science. 1984 Jun 15;224(4654):1191-8
pubmed: 17819476