Better cognitive efficiency is associated with increased experimental anxiety.
anxiety
cognitive control
startle blink
working memory
Journal
Psychophysiology
ISSN: 1540-5958
Titre abrégé: Psychophysiology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0142657
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
23
09
2019
revised:
04
02
2020
accepted:
10
02
2020
pubmed:
18
3
2020
medline:
23
6
2021
entrez:
18
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is increased interest in the development of cognitive training targeting working memory (WM) to alleviate anxiety symptoms, but the effectiveness of such an approach is unclear. Improved understanding of the effect of cognitive training on anxiety may facilitate the development of more effective cognitive training treatment for anxiety disorders. This study uses an experimental approach to examine the interplay of WM and anxiety following WM training. Previous studies show that increased demand on WM reduces concurrent anxiety evoked by threat of shock (induced anxiety). However, improving WM pharmacologically or via exercise prevents this anxiolytic effect. Conceivably, improving WM frees up cognitive resources to process threat information, thereby increasing anxiety. The present study tested the hypothesis that practicing a high load WM (i.e., increased demand) task would improve WM, and thus, free cognitive resources to process threat of shock, resulting in more anxiety (i.e., greater startle) during a subsequent WM task. Participants were randomly assigned to two training groups. The active-training group (N = 20) was trained on a 1- (low load) & 3-back (high load) WM task, whereas the control-training group (N = 20) performed a 0-back WM task. The experimental phase, similar in both groups, consisted of a 1- & 3-back WM task performed during both threat of shock and safety. As predicted, active training improved WM accuracy and increased anxiety during the experimental 3-back WM task. Therefore, improving WM efficiency can increase anxiety, possibly by freeing WM resources to process threat information.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32180239
doi: 10.1111/psyp.13559
pmc: PMC7437543
mid: NIHMS1617804
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00026559']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e13559Subventions
Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : ZIA MH002798
Pays : United States
Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : ZIAMH002798
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Published 2020. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Références
Eur Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;30(1):75-81
pubmed: 25451246
Science. 2007 Jan 19;315(5810):393-5
pubmed: 17234951
Behav Brain Res. 1993 Dec 20;58(1-2):175-98
pubmed: 8136044
Psychol Bull. 2010 Mar;136(2):188-197
pubmed: 20192557
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2016 Aug;44(6):1185-96
pubmed: 26607383
Behav Res Ther. 2018 Jan;100:24-29
pubmed: 29128585
Psychiatry Res. 2019 May;275:261-268
pubmed: 30939398
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 02;7:47
pubmed: 26869956
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 7;114(10):E2016-E2025
pubmed: 28202735
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Feb 25;111(8):2871-8
pubmed: 24501122
Cogn Emot. 2019 Jun;33(4):863-870
pubmed: 30032703
Behav Res Ther. 2018 Jan;100:67-77
pubmed: 29103528
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Oct;233(19-20):3565-74
pubmed: 27492789
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May;33(3):615-622
pubmed: 17470009
Int J Psychophysiol. 2003 Jun;48(3):307-14
pubmed: 12798990
Percept Mot Skills. 2017 Dec;124(6):1164-1193
pubmed: 28829227
Emotion. 2006 Feb;6(1):40-61
pubmed: 16637749
Science. 1992 Jan 31;255(5044):556-9
pubmed: 1736359
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Dec;29(12):2090-2102
pubmed: 28777058
Psychol Sci. 2007 Aug;18(8):699-705
pubmed: 17680941
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Apr;53:79-92
pubmed: 28273486
Psychol Bull. 2011 Nov;137(6):940-58
pubmed: 21728399
Psychol Bull. 2006 Nov;132(6):946-958
pubmed: 17073528
Psychol Bull. 2016 Aug;142(8):831-864
pubmed: 26963369
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Oct;4(10):829-39
pubmed: 14523382
Am Psychol. 1995 May;50(5):372-85
pubmed: 7762889
Learn Mem. 2017 Aug 16;24(9):407-413
pubmed: 28814466
Conscious Cogn. 1995 Mar;4(1):1-21
pubmed: 7497092
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Jul;11(4):512-34
pubmed: 27474138
Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100
pubmed: 10945922
Aust J Psychol. 2016 Sep;68(3):228-238
pubmed: 27917000
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012 Feb 01;11(2):141-68
pubmed: 22293568
J Neurosci. 2013 Mar 20;33(12):5301-11
pubmed: 23516294
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Jul;20(7):987-996
pubmed: 28481349
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2009 Jan-Mar;18(1):23-33
pubmed: 19378696
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Mar 28;7:93
pubmed: 23542914
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Apr;22(2):366-77
pubmed: 25102926
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019 Nov;44(12):1999-2010
pubmed: 31226707
Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Apr;90(4):450-60
pubmed: 25746399
Nature. 2017 May 11;545(7653):181-186
pubmed: 28467817
Biol Psychol. 2016 Dec;121(Pt B):203-212
pubmed: 26407521
Psychophysiology. 2012 Jun;49(6):842-52
pubmed: 22332819
Emotion. 2007 May;7(2):336-53
pubmed: 17516812
J Neurosci. 2001 Jan 15;21(2):RC121
pubmed: 11160455
Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Nov;49:67-78
pubmed: 27611632
Nature. 2008 Oct 23;455(7216):1057-60
pubmed: 18948946
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Mar 04;7:58
pubmed: 23459454
Dev Sci. 2020 Jul;23(4):e12831
pubmed: 30927316