Impact of repeated cycles of EGF bispecific angiotoxin (eBAT) administered at a reduced interval from doxorubicin chemotherapy in dogs with splenic haemangiosarcoma.
Animals
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ pharmacology
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
/ methods
Dog Diseases
/ drug therapy
Dogs
Doxorubicin
/ therapeutic use
Epidermal Growth Factor
/ pharmacology
Female
Hemangiosarcoma
/ drug therapy
Male
Splenic Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Treatment Outcome
canine
epidermal growth factor receptor
haemangiosarcoma
sarcoma
targeted toxin
urokinase plasminogen activator receptor
Journal
Veterinary and comparative oncology
ISSN: 1476-5829
Titre abrégé: Vet Comp Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101185242
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
09
10
2019
revised:
10
03
2020
accepted:
11
03
2020
pubmed:
19
3
2020
medline:
9
9
2021
entrez:
19
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We previously reported that eBAT, an EGF-targeted angiotoxin, was safe and it improved the overall survival for dogs with splenic haemangiosarcoma when added to the standard of care in a single cycle of three administrations in the minimal residual disease setting. Our objective for the SRCBST-2 trial was to assess whether increased dosing through multiple cycles of eBAT would be well tolerated and would further enhance the benefits of eBAT. Eligibility was expanded to dogs with stage 3 haemangiosarcoma, provided that gross lesions could be surgically excised. The interval between eBAT and the start of chemotherapy was reduced, and the experimental therapy was expanded to three cycles, each administered at the biologically active dose (50 μg/kg) on a Monday/Wednesday/Friday schedule following splenectomy, and scheduled 1 week prior to the first, second and fifth doxorubicin chemotherapy. Twenty-five dogs were enrolled; six experienced acute hypotension with two requiring hospitalization. Self-limiting elevation of ALT was observed in one dog. A statistically significant survival benefit was not seen in this study in eBAT-treated dogs compared with a Contemporary comparison group of dogs with stages 1-3 haemangiosarcoma treated with standard of care alone. Our results indicate that repeated dosing cycles of eBAT starting 1 week prior to doxorubicin chemotherapy led to greater toxicity and reduced efficacy compared with a single cycle given between surgery and a delayed start of chemotherapy. Further work is needed to understand the precise mechanisms of action of eBAT in order to optimize its clinical benefits in the treatment of canine haemangiosarcoma and other tumours. IACUC Protocols 1110A06186 and 1507-32804A.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32187827
doi: 10.1111/vco.12590
pmc: PMC7501152
mid: NIHMS1579193
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic
0
Epidermal Growth Factor
62229-50-9
Doxorubicin
80168379AG
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
664-674Subventions
Organisme : Masonic Cancer Center, UMN
ID : CETI Translational Award
Organisme : Hyundai Hope On Wheels
ID : Hyundai Scholar Senior Research Award
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA077598
Pays : United States
Organisme : Angiosarcoma Awareness Foundation
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA036725
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIAID
ID : R01 CA36725
Organisme : National Institute of Health
ID : K01OD017242
Organisme : GREYlong
Organisme : Animal Cancer Care and Research Program, UMN
Organisme : Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota Sarcoma Translational Working Group
Organisme : American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation
ID : 1889-G
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : K01 OD017242
Pays : United States
Organisme : Randy Shaver Cancer Research and Community Foundation
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002494
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Canine Cancer Foundation
ID : AB15MN-002 f
Informations de copyright
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Am J Pathol. 2014 Apr;184(4):985-995
pubmed: 24525151
Am J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct;37(5):473-9
pubmed: 23428947
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1822-8
pubmed: 22355053
J Vet Intern Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;24(1):8-9
pubmed: 20002550
Exp Cell Res. 2014 Apr 15;323(1):155-164
pubmed: 24582862
Vet Comp Oncol. 2004 Dec;2(4):195-213
pubmed: 19379294
J Neurosurg. 2011 Jun;114(6):1662-71
pubmed: 21294620
Ann Oncol. 2015 Aug;26(8):1677-84
pubmed: 25735315
Am J Cancer Res. 2014 Nov 19;4(6):683-97
pubmed: 25520860
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Mar 15;21(6):1267-72
pubmed: 25770294
J Neurooncol. 2008 Mar;87(1):51-61
pubmed: 18084721
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2015 Aug 15;247(4):393-403
pubmed: 26225611
Nat Biotechnol. 2003 Apr;21(4):387-91
pubmed: 12627168
Mol Cancer Ther. 2017 May;16(5):956-965
pubmed: 28193671
Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55
pubmed: 7165009
Oncotarget. 2017 Sep 23;9(15):11938-11947
pubmed: 29552283
Cancer Treat Rev. 2014 Jun;40(5):636-47
pubmed: 24629273
Br J Cancer. 2009 Oct 6;101(7):1114-23
pubmed: 19755995
Nat Med. 1996 Mar;2(3):350-3
pubmed: 8612238
Leuk Res. 2009 Sep;33(9):1233-42
pubmed: 19327829
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 May 15;11(10):3879-88
pubmed: 15897589
BMC Cancer. 2010 Nov 09;10:619
pubmed: 21062482
Int J Cancer. 2013 Oct 15;133(8):1936-44
pubmed: 23553371
Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Sep 26;10:113-121
pubmed: 30288129
J Neurooncol. 2011 Jun;103(2):255-66
pubmed: 20830604
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Oct 1;15(19):6137-47
pubmed: 19789305
BMC Vet Res. 2015 Jun 11;11:131
pubmed: 26062540