Feasibility of Coronary Access and Aortic Valve Reintervention in Low-Risk TAVR Patients.
Aged
Aortic Valve
/ diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve Stenosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Bioprosthesis
Cardiac Catheterization
/ adverse effects
Computed Tomography Angiography
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Stenosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Coronary Vessels
/ diagnostic imaging
Feasibility Studies
Female
Heart Valve Prosthesis
Humans
Male
Multidetector Computed Tomography
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Retreatment
Risk Factors
Severity of Illness Index
Time Factors
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
/ adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
United States
coronary access
coronary artery obstruction
percutaneous coronary intervention
transcatheter aortic valve replacement
valve-in-valve
Journal
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
ISSN: 1876-7605
Titre abrégé: JACC Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101467004
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 03 2020
23 03 2020
Historique:
received:
05
08
2019
revised:
23
12
2019
accepted:
02
01
2020
entrez:
21
3
2020
pubmed:
21
3
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of coronary access and aortic valve reintervention in low-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (THV). Younger, low-risk TAVR patients are more likely than older, higher risk patients to require coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, or aortic valve reintervention, but their THVs may impede coronary access and cause coronary obstruction during TAVR-in-TAVR. The LRT (Low Risk TAVR) trial (NCT02628899) enrolled 200 subjects with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis to undergo TAVR using commercially available THVs. Subjects who received balloon-expandable THVs and who had 30-day cardiac computed tomographic scans were included in this study. In a subgroup, the feasibility of intentional THV crimping on the delivery catheter to pre-determine commissural alignment was tested. In the LRT trial, 168 subjects received balloon-expandable THVs and had 30-day cardiac computed tomographic scans, of which 137 were of adequate image quality for analysis. The most challenging anatomy for coronary access (THV frame above and commissural suture post in front of a coronary ostium) was observed in 9% to 13% of subjects. Intentional THV crimping did not appear to meaningfully affect commissural alignment. The THV frame extended above the sinotubular junction in 21% of subjects, and in 13%, the distance between the THV and the sinotubular junction was <2 mm, signifying that TAVR-in-TAVR may not be feasible without causing coronary obstruction. TAVR may present challenges to future coronary access and aortic valve reintervention in a substantial number of low-risk patients.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of coronary access and aortic valve reintervention in low-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (THV).
BACKGROUND
Younger, low-risk TAVR patients are more likely than older, higher risk patients to require coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, or aortic valve reintervention, but their THVs may impede coronary access and cause coronary obstruction during TAVR-in-TAVR.
METHODS
The LRT (Low Risk TAVR) trial (NCT02628899) enrolled 200 subjects with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis to undergo TAVR using commercially available THVs. Subjects who received balloon-expandable THVs and who had 30-day cardiac computed tomographic scans were included in this study. In a subgroup, the feasibility of intentional THV crimping on the delivery catheter to pre-determine commissural alignment was tested.
RESULTS
In the LRT trial, 168 subjects received balloon-expandable THVs and had 30-day cardiac computed tomographic scans, of which 137 were of adequate image quality for analysis. The most challenging anatomy for coronary access (THV frame above and commissural suture post in front of a coronary ostium) was observed in 9% to 13% of subjects. Intentional THV crimping did not appear to meaningfully affect commissural alignment. The THV frame extended above the sinotubular junction in 21% of subjects, and in 13%, the distance between the THV and the sinotubular junction was <2 mm, signifying that TAVR-in-TAVR may not be feasible without causing coronary obstruction.
CONCLUSIONS
TAVR may present challenges to future coronary access and aortic valve reintervention in a substantial number of low-risk patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32192693
pii: S1936-8798(20)30268-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.01.202
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
726-735Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.