The "Omega Sign": a novel HoLEP technique that improves continence outcomes after enucleation.
HoLEP
Holmium laser
Laser enucleation
Omega Sign
Journal
World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
12
12
2019
accepted:
26
02
2020
pubmed:
21
3
2020
medline:
6
8
2021
entrez:
21
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Holmium-laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has been a promising prostate surgery since its first introduction. Although there are 10 different HoLEP techniques in the literature, stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is common, because surgery is not performed based on the topographic anatomy of the external sphincter. We have developed a new HoLEP method named as the ''Omega Sign technique", which is based on the topographic anatomy of the external sphincter and could provide better continence outcomes by decreasing SUI rates. The data of 400 patients who underwent HoLEP by a single surgeon between May 2016 and February 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups, the first underwent the Gilling's technique (Group 1) and the second the novel ''Omega Sign'' technique (Group 2). Continence status and post-micturition symptoms (PMS) were evaluated according to the standards recommended by the international continence status. The data of 400 HoLEP procedures between May 2016 and February 2019 were analyzed, comparing Group 1 (n = 200) and Group 2(n = 200). SUI rate was significantly lower in Group 2 at the day of catheter removal and first month (p < 0.005). In addition, urge urinary incontinence (UUI) rate and PMS were significantly lower in Group 2. We could demonstrate improved continence results, comparable functional outcomes and equally minimal complications with the standard HoLEP technique. We believe that, the novel 'Omega sign' technique decreases SUI rates and will become standardised and easy to understand, thereby bringing and creating a shorter learning curve.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32193652
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03152-9
pii: 10.1007/s00345-020-03152-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
135-141Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Gilling PJ, Cass CB, Cresswell MD et al (1996) Holmium laser resection of the prostate: preliminary results of a new method for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 47:48
doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80381-1
Fraundorfer MR, Gilling PJ (1998) Holmium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate combined with mechanical morcellation: preliminary results. Eur Urol 33:69
doi: 10.1159/000019535
Saitta G, Becerra JEA, del Álamo JF et al (2019) ‘En Bloc’HoLEP with early apical release in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. World J Urol 37(11):2451–2458
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02671-4
Miernik A, Schoeb DS (2019) “Three horse shoe-like incision” holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: first experience with a novel en bloc technique for anatomic transurethral prostatectomy. World J Urol 37:523
doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2418-0
Ito T, Tamura K, Otsuka A et al (2019) Development of a complete en-bloc technique with direct bladder neck incision: a newly modified approach for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. J Endourol 33:835
doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0773
Elmansy H, Hodhod A, Kotb A et al (2019) Top-down holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: technical aspects and early outcomes. Urology 126:236
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.01.019
Ahyai SA, Gilling P, Kaplan SA et al (2010) Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol 58:384
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.005
Cornu JN, Ahyai S, Bachmann A et al (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update. Eur Urol 67:1066
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.017
Humphreys MR, Miller NL, Handa SE et al (2008) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate—outcomes independent of prostate size? J Urol 180:2431
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.019
Reich O, Gratzke C, Bachmann A et al (2008) Urology Section of the Bavarian Working Group for Quality Assurance†. Morbidity, mortality and early outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective multicenter evaluation of 10,654 patients. J Urol 180:246
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.058
Montorsi F, Naspro R, Salonia A et al (2008) Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results from a 2-center prospective randomized trial in patients with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 179:S87
pubmed: 18405765
Gazel E, Kaya E, Yalcin S et al (2019) Comparison of the efficacy of the prostate in treating prostate volumes of ≤80 and %3e80 mL. Urol Int 102:306
doi: 10.1159/000496173
Krambeck AE, Handa SE, Lingeman JE (2010) Experience with more than 1,000 holmium laser prostate enucleations for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 183:1105
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.034
Kuntz RM, Ahyai S, Lehrich K et al (2004) Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral electrocautery resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial in 200 patients. J Urol 172:1012
doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000136218.11998.9e
Bae J, Choo M, Park JH et al (2011) Holmium laser enucleation of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: Seoul National University hospital experience. Int Neurourol J 15:29
doi: 10.5213/inj.2011.15.1.29
Gilling PJ, Aho TF, Frampton CM et al (2008) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: results at 6 years. Eur Urol 53:744
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.052
Oh SJ (2019) Current surgical techniques of enucleation in holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Investig Clin Urol 60:333
doi: 10.4111/icu.2019.60.5.333
Endo F, Shiga Y, Minagawa S et al (2010) Anteroposterior dissection HoLEP: a modification to prevent transient stress urinary incontinence. Urology 76:1451
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.071
Wu Y, Dabhoiwala NF, Hagoort J et al (2018) Architecture of structures in the urogenital triangle of young adult males; comprasion with females. J Anat 233:447
doi: 10.1111/joa.12864
Wallner C, Dabhoiwala NF, DeRuiter MC et al (2009) The Anatomical components of urinary continence. Eur Urol 55:932
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.032
Morgan M, Smith N, Thomas K et al (2009) Is Clavien the new standard for reporting urological complications? BJU Int 104:434
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08516.x
Donovan JL, Peters TJ, Abrams P et al (2000) Scoring the short form ICSmaleSF questionnaire. International Continence Society. J Urol 164:1948
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66926-1
Kim M, Lee HE, Oh SJ (2013) : Technical aspects of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Korean J Urol 54:570
doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.9.570
Scoffone CM, Cracco CM (2016) : The en-bloc no-touch holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) technique. World J Urol 34:1175
doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1741-y
Gong YG, He DL, Wang MZ et al (2012) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a modified enucleation technique and initial results. J Urol 187:1336
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.093
Minagawa S, Okada S, Sakamoto H et al (2015) En-bloc technique with anteroposterior dissection holmium laser enucleation of the prostate allows a short operative time and acceptable outcomes. Urology 86:628
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.06.009
Takiuchi H, Nakao A, Ihara H et al (2008) Prevention of transient urinary incontinence in peri-operative period of modified holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Hinyokika Kiyo 54:475
pubmed: 18697491
Naspro R, Suardi N, Salonia A et al (2006) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates%3e 70 g: 24-month follow-up. Eur Urol 50:563
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.04.003
Sapetti J, Sakat J, Saad E et al (2019) Urinary incontinence after HOLEP: Incidence, evolution and predictive factors. Prog Urol 29:101
doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2018.12.008