Impact of Medicaid insurance on outcomes following endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery.
Adenoma
/ surgery
Adult
Aged
Body Mass Index
Comorbidity
Cranial Nerve Diseases
/ epidemiology
Databases, Factual
Endoscopy
/ economics
Female
Humans
Length of Stay
Male
Medicaid
/ statistics & numerical data
Middle Aged
Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery
Neurosurgical Procedures
/ economics
Nose
Patient Readmission
/ economics
Pituitary Neoplasms
/ surgery
Postoperative Complications
/ economics
Prospective Studies
Sphenoid Bone
/ surgery
Treatment Outcome
United States
Vision Disorders
/ epidemiology
complications
endonasal
endoscopic
insurance
pituitary adenoma
pituitary surgery
socioeconomic
transsphenoidal
Journal
Journal of neurosurgery
ISSN: 1933-0693
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0253357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Mar 2020
20 Mar 2020
Historique:
received:
03
10
2019
accepted:
16
01
2020
pubmed:
21
3
2020
medline:
31
7
2021
entrez:
21
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite the rise of studies in the neurosurgical literature suggesting that patients with Medicaid insurance have inferior outcomes, there remains a paucity of data on the impact of insurance on outcomes after endonasal endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (EETS). Given the increasing importance of complications in quality-based healthcare metrics, the objective of this study was to assess whether Medicaid insurance type influences outcomes in EETS for pituitary adenoma. The authors analyzed a prospectively acquired database of EETS for pituitary adenoma from 2005 to 2018 at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine. All patients with Medicaid insurance were identified. As a control group, the clinical, socioeconomic, and radiographic data of all other patients in the series with non-Medicaid insurance were reviewed. Statistical significance was determined with an alpha < 0.05 using Pearson chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and the independent-samples t-test for continuous variables. Of 584 patients undergoing EETS for pituitary adenoma, 57 (10%) had Medicaid insurance. The maximum tumor diameter was significantly larger for Medicaid patients (26.1 ± 12 vs 23.1 ± 11 mm for controls, p < 0.05). Baseline comorbidities including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking history, and BMI were not significantly different between Medicaid patients and controls. Patients with Medicaid insurance had a significantly higher rate of any complication (14% vs 7% for controls, p < 0.05) and long-term cranial neuropathy (5% vs 1% for controls, p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in endocrine outcome or vision outcome. The mean postoperative length of stay was significantly longer for Medicaid patients compared to the controls (9.4 ± 31 vs 3.6 ± 3 days, p < 0.05). This difference remained significant even when accounting for outliers (5.6 ± 2.5 vs 3.0 ± 2.7 days for controls, p < 0.05). The most common causes of extended length of stay greater than 1 standard deviation for Medicaid patients were management of perioperative complications and disposition challenges. The rate of 30-day readmission was 7% for Medicaid patients and 4.4% for controls, which was not a statistically significant difference. The authors found that larger tumor diameter, longer postoperative length of stay, higher rate of complications, and long-term cranial neuropathy were significantly associated with Medicaid insurance. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline comorbidities, apoplexy, endocrine outcome, vision outcome, or 30-day readmission.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32197242
doi: 10.3171/2020.1.JNS192707
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM