Performing the hand laterality judgement task does not necessarily require motor imagery.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 03 2020
20 03 2020
Historique:
received:
25
04
2019
accepted:
05
03
2020
entrez:
22
3
2020
pubmed:
22
3
2020
medline:
7
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
When people judge the laterality of rotated hand images, that is they perform the laterality judgement task (LJT), they are thought to use motor imagery. However, recent studies have suggested that its completion does not necessarily require the use of motor imagery. In this study, we investigated whether and how many people preferentially use motor imagery to perform the LJT in 37 healthy adults. We assessed the presence of behavioural features associated with motor imagery at the individual level, namely, the linear angle-response time (RT) relationship and the biomechanical constraints effect in the LJT and in the same-different judgement task (SDJT), in which people are not thought to use motor imagery. We found that at most 50% of participants showed both behavioural features in the palmar view condition of the LJT. Moreover, this proportion did not differ from that in the dorsal view condition of the LJT or that in both view conditions of the SDJT. These results demonstrate that a motor imagery-based strategy is not universally and specifically used to perform the LJT. Therefore, previous results of the LJT, in particular, regarding the biomechanical constraints effect, should be reinterpreted in light of our findings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32198401
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61937-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-61937-9
pmc: PMC7083854
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5155Références
Dickstein, R. & Deutsch, J. E. Motor imagery in physical therapist practice. Phys. Ther. 87, 942–953 (2007).
doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060331
Ge, S., Wang, R. & Yu, D. Classification of four-class motor imagery employing single channel electroencephalography. PloS One 9, e98019, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098019 (2014).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098019
pubmed: 24950192
pmcid: 4064966
Sharma, N., Pomeroy, V. M. & Baron, J. C. Motor imagery: a backdoor to the motor system after stroke. Stroke 37, 1941–1952 (2006).
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000226902.43357.fc
Hanakawa, T. Organizing motor imageries. Neurosci. Res. 104, 56–63 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2015.11.003
Hardwick, R. M., Caspers, S., Eickhoff, S. B. & Swinnen, S. P. Neural correlates of action: Comparing meta-analysis of imagery, observation, and execution. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 94, 31–44 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.08.003
Malouin, F., Jackson, P. L. & Richards, C. L. Towards the integration of mental practice in rehabilitation programs. A critical review. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 576, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00576 (2013).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00576
pubmed: 24065903
pmcid: 3776942
Mizoguchi, N. & Kanosue, K. Changes in brain activity during action observation and motor imagery: Their relationship with motor learning. Prog. Brain. Res. 234, 189–204 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.08.008
Harris, J. E. & Hebert, A. Utilization of motor imagery in upper limb rehabilitation: a systematic scoping review. Clin. Rehabil. 29, 1092–1107 (2015).
doi: 10.1177/0269215514566248
Boonstra, A. M. et al. Using the Hand Laterality Judgment Task to assess motor imagery: a study of practice effects in repeated measurements. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 35, 278–280 (2012).
doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e328355dd1e
de Vries, S. et al. Motor imagery ability in stroke patients: the relationship between implicit and explicit motor imagery measures. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 790, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00790 (2013).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00790
pubmed: 24312044
pmcid: 3832786
Kemlin, C., Moulton, E., Samson, Y. & Rosso, C. Do Motor Imagery Performances Depend on the Side of the Lesion at the Acute Stage of Stroke? Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, 321, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00321 (2016).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00321
pubmed: 27445761
pmcid: 4921466
Helmich, R. C., de Lange, F. P., Bloem, B. R. & Toni, I. Cerebral compensation during motor imagery in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia 45, 2201–2215 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.024
Schwoebel, J., Friedman, R., Duda, N. & Coslett, H. B. Pain and the body schema: evidence for peripheral effects on mental representation of movement. Brain 124, 2098–2104 (2001).
doi: 10.1093/brain/124.10.2098
Sekiyama, K. Kinesthetic aspects of mental representation in the identification of left and right hands. Percept. Psychophys. 32, 89–95 (1982).
doi: 10.3758/BF03204268
Parsons, L. M. Imagined spatial transformation of one’s hand and feet. Cogn. Psycol. 19, 187–241 (1987).
Berneiser, J., Jahn, G., Grothe, M. & Lotze, M. From visual to motor strategies: Training in mental rotation of hands. Neuroimage 167, 247–255 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.014
Ferron, L. & Tremblay, F. (Lack of) Corticospinal facilitation in association with hand laterality judgments. Exp. Brain Res. 235, 2317–2326 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4973-9
Hoyek, N. et al. Hand mental rotation is not systematically altered by actual position: Laterality judgment versus same-different comparison task. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 76, 519–526 (2014).
doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0577-z
Gaiser, C., Lehmann, W. & Eid, M. Separating “Rotators” From “Nonrotators” in Mental Rotation Test: A Multigroup Latent Class Analysis. Multivariate Behav. Res. 41, 261–293 (2006).
doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4103_2
ter Horst, A. C., van Lier, R. & Steenbergen, B. Mental rotation task of hands: differential influence number of rotational axes. Exp. Brain Res. 203, 347–354 (2010).
doi: 10.1007/s00221-010-2235-1
Bläsing, B., Brugger, P., Weigelt, M. & Schack, T. Does thumb postures influence the mental rotation of hands? Neurosci. Lett. 534, 139–144 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.11.034
Shepard, R. N. & Metzler, L. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171, 701–703 (1971).
doi: 10.1126/science.171.3972.701
De Simone, L. et al. The effect of healthy aging on mental imagery as revealed by egocentric and allocentric mental spatial transformations. Acta. psychol (Amst). 143, 145–156 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.02.014
Conson, M., Mazzarella, E. & Trojano, L. Developmental changes of the biomechanical constraints effect in motor imagery. Exp. Brain. Res. 226, 441–449 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3456-x
Habacha, H., Molinaro, C., Tabben, M. & Lejeune-Poutrain, L. Implementation of specific motor expertise during a mental rotation task of hands. Exp. Brain. Res. 232, 3465–3473 (2014).
doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4029-3
Munzert, J., Lorey, B. & Zentgraf, K. Cognitive motor process: the role of motor imagery in the study of motor representation. Brain Res. Rev. 60, 306–326 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.024
Williams, J. et al. The relationship between corticospinal excitability during motor imagery and motor imagery ability. Behav. Brain Res. 226, 369–375 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.09.014
Lebon, F., Lotze, M., Stinear, C. M. & Byblow, W. D. Task-dependent interaction between parietal and contralateral primary motor cortex during explicit versus implicit motor imagery. PloS One 7, e37850, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037850 (2012).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037850
pubmed: 22693579
pmcid: 3365049
Vannuscorps, G., Pillon, A. & Andress, M. Effect of biomechanical constraints in the hand laterality judgment task: where does it come from? Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 299, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00299 (2012).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00299
pubmed: 23125830
pmcid: 3485652
Meng, S., Oi, M., Saito, G. & Saito, H. The neural correlates of biomechanical constraints in hand laterality judgment task performed from other person’s perspective: A near-infrared spectroscopy study. PloS One 12, e0183818, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183818 (2017).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183818
pubmed: 28863149
pmcid: 5580981
Parsons, L. M. Integrating cognitive psychology, neurology and neuroimaging. Acta Psychol (Amst). 107, 155–181 (2001).
doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00023-3
Parsons, L. M. et al. Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Nature 375, 54–58 (1995).
doi: 10.1038/375054a0
Osuagwu, B. A. & Vuckovic, A. Similarities between explicit and implicit motor imagery in mental rotation of hands: an EEG study. Neuropsychologia 65, 197–210 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.029
Kosslyn, S. M. et al. Mental rotation of objects versus hands: neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography. Psychophysiology 35, 151–161 (1998).
doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3520151
Vingerhoets, G. et al. Motor imagery in mental rotation: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 17, 1623–1633 (2002).
doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1290
Bowering, K. J. et al. The effects of graded motor imagery and its components on chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Pain. 14, 3–13 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.09.007
Schwabe, L. et al. Stress modulates the use of spatial versus stimulus-response learning strategies in humans. Learn Mem. 14, 109–116 (2007).
doi: 10.1101/lm.435807
Xue, J. et al. Uncovering the cognitive processes underlying mental rotation: an eye-movement study. Sci. Rep. 7, 1 0076, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10683-6 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10683-6
ter Horst, A. C., van Lier, R. & Steenbergen, B. Mental rotation strategies reflected in event-related (de) synchronization of α and μ power. Psychophysiology 50, 858–863 (2013).
doi: 10.1111/psyp.12076
de Lange, F. P., Jensen, O., Bauer, M. & Toni, I. Interactions between posterior gamma and frontal alpha/beta oscillations during imagined actions. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2, 7, https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.007.2008 (2008).
doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.007.2008
pubmed: 18958208
pmcid: 2572199
Hamada, H. et al. Comparison of brain activity between motor imagery and mental rotation of the hand tasks: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Brain Imaging Behav. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-017-9821-9 (2018).
doi: 10.1007/s11682-017-9821-9
Uttal, D. H. et al. The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. Psychol. Bull. 139, 352–402 (2013).
doi: 10.1037/a0028446
Joindes, J. How does practice makes perfect. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 10–11 (2004).
doi: 10.1038/nn0104-10
Jolles, D. D. & Crone, E. A. Training the developing brain: a neurocognitive perspective. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 76, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.201200076 (2012).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.201200076
pubmed: 22509161
pmcid: 3321411
Olesen, P. J., Weserberg, H. & Klingberg, T. Increased prefrontal and parietal activity after training of working memory. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 75–79 (2004).
doi: 10.1038/nn1165
Meneghetti, C. et al. The role of practice and strategy in mental rotation training: transfer and maintenance effects. Psychol. Res. 81, 415–431 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0749-2
Nicholls, M. E., Thomas, N. A., Loetscher, T. & Grimshaw, G. The Flinders Handedness survey (FLANDERS): a brief measure of skilled hand preference. Cortex 49, 2914–2926 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.02.002
Okubo, M., Suzuki, H. & Nicholls, M. E. A Japanese version of the FLANDERS handedness questionnaire. Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 8, 474–481 (2014). [in Japanese].
doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.85.13235
Sekiyama, K., Kinoshita, T. & Soshi, T. Strong biomechanical constraints on young children’s mental imagery of hands. R. Soc. Open Sci. 1, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140118 (2014).
doi: 10.1098/rsos.140118