Increased resting heart rate and prognosis in treatment-naïve unselected cancer patients: results from a prospective observational study.
Electrocardiogram
Resting heart rate
Survival
Treatment-naïve cancer patients
Journal
European journal of heart failure
ISSN: 1879-0844
Titre abrégé: Eur J Heart Fail
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100887595
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
received:
08
10
2019
revised:
21
02
2020
accepted:
16
02
2020
pubmed:
24
3
2020
medline:
20
5
2021
entrez:
24
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cancer patients suffer from impaired cardiovascular function. Elevated resting heart rate (RHR) has been identified as a marker for increased long-term mortality in cancer patients prior to the receipt of anticancer treatment. We aimed to establish whether RHR is associated with survival in treatment-naïve cancer patients. This prospective study enrolled 548 unselected treatment-naïve cancer patients between 2011 and 2013. The median age of the cohort was 62 years; 40.9% were male and 32.7% had metastatic disease. Median RHR was 72 b.p.m. Most patients were in sinus rhythm (n = 507, 92.5%). Clinical heart failure was noted in 37 (6.8%) patients. RHR was not related to cancer stage (P = 0.504). Patients in the highest RHR tertile had higher levels of high-sensitivity troponin (P = 0.003) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (P = 0.039). During a median follow-up of 25 months (interquartile range: 16-32 months; range: 0-40 months), 185 (33.8%) patients died from any cause [1-year-mortality: 17%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13-20%]. In univariate survival analysis, RHR predicted all-cause mortality [crude hazard ratio (HR) for a 5 b.p.m. increase in RHR: 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15; P < 0.001], and remained significantly associated with outcome after adjustment for age, gender, tumour entity, tumour stage, cardiac status and haemoglobin (adjusted HR for a 5 b.p.m. increase in RHR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.16; P < 0.001). There was no significant impact of metastatic/non-metastatic disease state on the predictive value of RHR (P = 0.433 for interaction). In subgroup analyses, the strongest associations for RHR with mortality were observed in lung (crude HR 1.14; P = 0.007) and gastrointestinal (crude HR 1.31; P < 0.001) cancer. Treatment-naïve cancer patients with higher RHRs display higher levels of cardiovascular biomarkers. RHR was independently associated with all-cause mortality, especially in lung and gastrointestinal cancers. Elevated RHR and cardiovascular biomarkers may represent early signs of incipient cardiac dysfunction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32202022
doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1782
pmc: PMC7540544
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1230-1238Subventions
Organisme : Medical University of Vienna
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.
Références
ESC Heart Fail. 2017 Nov;4(4):448-457
pubmed: 28960880
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 21;47(4):789-93
pubmed: 16487846
ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Dec;5(6):1083-1091
pubmed: 30570223
Am J Epidemiol. 1981 Oct;114(4):477-87
pubmed: 7304578
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Dec;18(12):1524-1534
pubmed: 27910284
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Nov;19(11):1361-1378
pubmed: 28949064
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 May;20(5):879-887
pubmed: 29464808
ESC Heart Fail. 2017 May;4(2):81-87
pubmed: 28451443
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Sep 13;113(37):10436-41
pubmed: 27582470
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 22;71(20):2281-2290
pubmed: 29540327
Eur Heart J. 2000 Jan;21(2):116-24
pubmed: 10637085
Heart. 2015 Aug;101(15):1182-9
pubmed: 26041770
Am Heart J. 1987 Jun;113(6):1489-94
pubmed: 3591616
Am J Public Health. 2001 Aug;91(8):1258-63
pubmed: 11499115
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86
pubmed: 25220842
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Sep 30;64(13):1310-9
pubmed: 25257631
Eur Heart J. 2014 Apr;35(14):932-41
pubmed: 23990596
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 12;9(1):8565
pubmed: 31189941
Support Care Cancer. 2000 May;8(3):175-9
pubmed: 10789956
Circulation. 2016 Mar 15;133(11):1104-14
pubmed: 26976915
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2013 Dec;10(4):296-306
pubmed: 23963583
Heart. 2015 Dec;101(23):1874-80
pubmed: 26416836
Eur Heart J. 2005 Feb;26(3):215-25
pubmed: 15642700
Circulation. 2004 Jun 29;109(25):3122-31
pubmed: 15226229
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Apr 1;18(4):392-401
pubmed: 28064155
Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Aug;36(4):834-40
pubmed: 17440032
Lancet. 2010 Sep 11;376(9744):875-85
pubmed: 20801500
Lancet. 2010 Sep 11;376(9744):886-94
pubmed: 20801495
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;18(8):891-975
pubmed: 27207191
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 May;20(5):898-906
pubmed: 29148208
Heart. 2014 Nov;100(21):1673-80
pubmed: 24860005
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Aug;16(8):907-14
pubmed: 24935020
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 2;13(3):e0193753
pubmed: 29499053
N Engl J Med. 2001 May 31;344(22):1651-8
pubmed: 11386263
Psychosom Med. 2008 Feb;70(2):141-6
pubmed: 18256350
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Feb;19(2):250-252
pubmed: 27917598
Annu Rev Med. 2006;57:485-98
pubmed: 16409162
Lancet. 1999 Jun 12;353(9169):2001-7
pubmed: 10376614
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Jul;16(7):778-87
pubmed: 24864045
Lancet. 1999 Jan 2;353(9146):9-13
pubmed: 10023943
Lancet. 1975 May 10;1(7915):1051-6
pubmed: 48728
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e21310
pubmed: 21826196
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Sep;159(2):375-84
pubmed: 27544225
Cancer Res. 2010 Sep 15;70(18):7042-52
pubmed: 20823155
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Jan;19(1):9-42
pubmed: 27565769