The evolution of the therapeutic approach to membranous nephropathy.
Adult
Antibodies
Antineoplastic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Cyclosporine
/ therapeutic use
Glomerulonephritis, Membranous
/ drug therapy
Glucocorticoids
/ therapeutic use
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents
/ therapeutic use
Nephrotic Syndrome
/ drug therapy
Proteinuria
/ drug therapy
Receptors, Phospholipase A2
Rituximab
/ therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
alkylating agents
glucocorticoids
membranous nephropathy
phospholipase A2 receptor 1 antibodies
proteinuria
rituximab
safety
Journal
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association
ISSN: 1460-2385
Titre abrégé: Nephrol Dial Transplant
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8706402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 04 2021
26 04 2021
Historique:
received:
07
10
2019
pubmed:
25
3
2020
medline:
23
7
2021
entrez:
25
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Primary membranous nephropathy (MN) is a frequent cause of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in adults. In untreated patients, the outcome is variable, with one-third of the patients entering remission while the remaining ones show persisting proteinuria or progression to end-stage renal disease. Randomized clinical trials reported the efficacy of a 6-month regimen alternating intravenous and oral glucocorticoids with an alkylating agent every other month. The potential side effects of this regimen were limited by the fact that the use of glucocorticoids and alkylating agent did not exceed 3 months each. Two randomized trials with follow-ups (FU) up to 10 years provided assurance about the long-term efficacy and safety of this cyclical therapy. Calcineurin inhibitors have also been used successfully. However, in most responders, NS relapsed after the drug was withdrawn. Conflicting results have been reported with mycophenolate salts and adrenocorticotropic hormone. Observational studies reported good results with rituximab (RTX). Two controlled trials demonstrated the superiority of RTX over antiproteinuric therapy alone and cyclosporine. However, the FUs were relatively short and no randomized trial has been published against cyclical therapy. The available results, together with the discovery that most patients with MN have circulating antibodies against the phospholipase A2 receptor 1, support the use of cytotoxic drugs or RTX in MN. It is difficult to choose between these two different treatments. RTX is easier to use, but the FUs of the available studies are short, thus doubts remain about the long-term risk of relapses and the safety of repeated administrations of RTX.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32206786
pii: 5811117
doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa014
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies
0
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Glucocorticoids
0
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
PLA2R1 protein, human
0
Receptors, Phospholipase A2
0
Rituximab
4F4X42SYQ6
Cyclosporine
83HN0GTJ6D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
768-773Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.