Stereolithography 3D Bioprinting.
Biocompatible Materials
Bioprinting
Equipment Design
Guided Tissue Regeneration
Humans
Hydrogels
/ radiation effects
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Lighting
/ instrumentation
Microtechnology
Photochemistry
Polymerization
/ radiation effects
Printing, Three-Dimensional
Stereolithography
Tissue Engineering
/ methods
Tissue Scaffolds
Hydrogel scaffolds
Photocrosslinking
Stereolithography 3D bioprinting
Tissue and organ regeneration
Journal
Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)
ISSN: 1940-6029
Titre abrégé: Methods Mol Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9214969
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
entrez:
25
3
2020
pubmed:
25
3
2020
medline:
9
3
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Stereolithography (SLA) 3D bioprinting has emerged as a prominent bioprinting method addressing the requirements of complex tissue fabrication. This chapter addresses the advancement in SLA 3D bioprinting in concurrent with the development of novel photocrosslinkable biomaterials with enhanced physical and chemical properties. We discuss the cytocompatible photoinitiators operating in the wide spectrum of the ultraviolet (UV) and the visible light and high-resolution dynamic mask projection systems with a suitable illumination source. The potential of SLA 3D bioprinting has been explored in various themes, like bone and neural tissue engineering and in the development of controlled microenvironments to study cell behavior. The flexible design and versatility of SLA bioprinting makes it an attractive bioprinting process with myriad possibilities and clinical applications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32207107
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0520-2_6
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biocompatible Materials
0
Hydrogels
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
93-108Références
O’Connell CD, Zhang B, Onofrillo C et al (2018) Tailoring the mechanical properties of gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels through manipulation of the photocrosslinking conditions. Soft Matter 14:2142–2151
doi: 10.1039/C7SM02187A
pubmed: 29488996
Colosi C, Shin SR, Manoharan V et al (2016) Microfluidic bioprinting of heterogeneous 3D tissue constructs using low-viscosity bioink. Adv Mater 28:677–684
doi: 10.1002/adma.201503310
pubmed: 26606883
Koch L, Deiwick A, Chichkov B (2017) Laser additive printing of cells. In: Laser additive manufacturing. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 421–437
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100433-3.00016-6
Park JA, Yoon S, Kwon J et al (2017) Freeform micropatterning of living cells into cell culture medium using direct inkjet printing. Sci Rep 7:14610
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14726-w
pubmed: 29097768
pmcid: 5668285
McAllister TN, Maruszewski M, Garrido SA et al (2009) Effectiveness of haemodialysis access with an autologous tissue-engineered vascular graft: a multicentre cohort study. Lancet 373:1440–1446
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60248-8
pubmed: 19394535
L’heureux N, Pâquet S, Labbé R et al (1998) A completely biological tissue-engineered human blood vessel. FASEB J 12:47–56
pubmed: 9438410
Lin C-C, Anseth KS (2009) PEG hydrogels for the controlled release of biomolecules in regenerative medicine. Pharm Res 26:631–643
doi: 10.1007/s11095-008-9801-2
pubmed: 19089601
Shirahama H, Lee BH, Tan LP, Cho NJ (2016) Precise tuning of facile one-pot gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) synthesis. Sci Rep 6:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31036
doi: 10.1038/srep31036
Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM et al (2015) Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 73:254–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045
pubmed: 26414409
pmcid: 4610009
Klotz BJ, Gawlitta D, Rosenberg AJWP et al (2016) Gelatin-Methacryloyl hydrogels: towards biofabrication-based tissue repair. Trends Biotechnol 34:394–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TIBTECH.2016.01.002
doi: 10.1016/J.TIBTECH.2016.01.002
pubmed: 26867787
pmcid: 5937681
Wang Z, Kumar H, Tian Z et al (2018) Visible light photoinitiation of cell-adhesive gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels for stereolithography 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:26859–26869
doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b06607
pubmed: 30024722
Nichol JW, Koshy ST, Bae H et al (2010) Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials 31:5536–5544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064
pubmed: 20417964
pmcid: 2878615
Lim KS, Schon BS, Mekhileri NV et al (2016) New visible-light Photoinitiating system for improved print Fidelity in gelatin-based bioinks. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2:1752–1762. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00149
doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00149
pubmed: 33440473
Noshadi I, Hong S, Sullivan KE et al (2017) In vitro and in vivo analysis of visible light crosslinkable gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomater Sci 5:2093–2105. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7BM00110J
doi: 10.1039/C7BM00110J
pubmed: 28805830
pmcid: 5614854
Ovsianikov A, Deiwick A, Van Vlierberghe S et al (2010) Laser fabrication of 3D gelatin scaffolds for the generation of bioartificial tissues. Materials (Basel) 4:288–299. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma4010288
doi: 10.3390/ma4010288
Chen Y, Lin R, Qi H et al (2012) Functional human vascular network generated in photocrosslinkable gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Adv Funct Mater 22(10):2027–2039. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201101662
doi: 10.1002/adfm.201101662
pubmed: 22907987
pmcid: 3422083
Samanipour R, Wang Z, Ahmadi A, Kim K (2016) Experimental and computational study of microfluidic flow-focusing generation of gelatin methacrylate hydrogel droplets. J Appl Polym Sci 133:24–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.43701
doi: 10.1002/app.43701
Wang Z, Abdulla R, Parker B et al (2015) A simple and high-resolution stereolithography-based 3D bioprinting system using visible light crosslinkable bioinks. Biofabrication 7:045009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045009
doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045009
pubmed: 26696527
Raman R, Bashir R (2015) Chapter 6: Stereolithographic 3D bioprinting for biomedical applications. Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam
Soman P, Chung PH, Zhang AP, Chen S (2013) Digital microfabrication of user-defined 3D microstructures in cell-laden hydrogels. Biotechnol Bioeng 110:3038–3047
doi: 10.1002/bit.24957
pubmed: 23686741
pmcid: 3784638
Gauvin R, Chen YC, Lee JW et al (2012) Microfabrication of complex porous tissue engineering scaffolds using 3D projection stereolithography. Biomaterials 33:3824–3834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.048
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.048
pubmed: 22365811
pmcid: 3766354
Lin C, Ki CS, Shih H (2015) Thiol–norbornene photoclick hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. J Appl Polym Sci 132:pii: 41563
doi: 10.1002/app.41563
Greene T, Lin TY, Andrisani OM, Lin CC (2017) Comparative study of visible light polymerized gelatin hydrogels for 3D culture of hepatic progenitor cells. J Appl Polym Sci 134:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.44585
doi: 10.1002/app.44585
Hoyle CE, Bowman CN (2010) Thiol–ene click chemistry. Angew Chem Int Ed 49:1540–1573
doi: 10.1002/anie.200903924
Kharkar PM, Rehmann MS, Skeens KM et al (2016) Thiol–ene click hydrogels for therapeutic delivery. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2:165–179
doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00420
pubmed: 28361125
pmcid: 5369354
Hermanson GT (2013) Bioconjugate techniques. Academic Press, New York
Lutolf MP, Lauer-Fields JL, Schmoekel HG et al (2003) Synthetic matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive hydrogels for the conduction of tissue regeneration: engineering cell-invasion characteristics. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:5413–5418
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0737381100
pubmed: 12686696
pmcid: 154359
Lutolf MP, Weber FE, Schmoekel HG et al (2003) Repair of bone defects using synthetic mimetics of collagenous extracellular matrices. Nat Biotechnol 21:513
doi: 10.1038/nbt818
pubmed: 12704396
Peng G, Wang J, Yang F et al (2013) In situ formation of biodegradable dextran-based hydrogel via Michael addition. J Appl Polym Sci 127:577–584
doi: 10.1002/app.37825
McGann CL, Levenson EA, Kiick KL (2013) Resilin-based hybrid hydrogels for cardiovascular tissue engineering. Macromol Chem Phys 214:203–213
doi: 10.1002/macp.201200412
Hao Y, Shih H, Muňoz Z et al (2014) Visible light cured thiol-vinyl hydrogels with tunable degradation for 3D cell culture. Acta Biomater 10:104–114
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.044
pubmed: 24021231
Shih H, Lin C (2013) Visible-light-mediated thiol-ene hydrogelation using eosin-Y as the only photoinitiator. Macromol Rapid Commun 34:269–273
doi: 10.1002/marc.201200605
pubmed: 23386583
Qin X-H, Ovsianikov A, Stampfl J, Liska R (2014) Additive manufacturing of photosensitive hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. BioNanoMaterials 15:49–70. https://doi.org/10.1515/bnm-2014-0008
doi: 10.1515/bnm-2014-0008
Williams CG, Malik AN, Kim TK et al (2005) Variable cytocompatibility of six cell lines with photoinitiators used for polymerizing hydrogels and cell encapsulation. Biomaterials 26:1211–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.024
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.024
pubmed: 15475050
Fairbanks BD, Schwartz MP, Bowman CN, Anseth KS (2009) Photoinitiated polymerization of PEG-diacrylate with lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate: polymerization rate and cytocompatibility. Biomaterials 30:6702–6707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.055
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.055
pubmed: 19783300
pmcid: 2896013
Ullrich G, Burtscher P, Salz U et al (2006) Phenylglycine derivatives as coinitiators for the radical photopolymerization of acidic aqueous formulations. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 44:115–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.21139
doi: 10.1002/pola.21139
Bahney CS, Lujan TJ, Hsu CW et al (2011) Visible light photoinitiation of mesenchymal stem cell-laden bioresponsive hydrogels. Eur Cells Mater 22:43–55
doi: 10.22203/eCM.v022a04
Popielarz R, Vogt O (2008) Effect of coinitiator type on initiation efficiency of two-component photoinitiator systems based on eosin. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 46:3519–3532
doi: 10.1002/pola.22688
Li L, Fourkas JT (2007) Multiphoton polymerization. Mater Today 10:30–37
doi: 10.1016/S1369-7021(07)70130-X
Bártolo PJ (2011) Stereolithographic processes. In: Stereolithography. Springer, New York, pp 1–36
doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-92904-0
Zhou C, Chen Y, Waltz RA (2009) Optimized mask image projection for solid freeform fabrication. J Manuf Sci Eng 131:061004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4000416
doi: 10.1115/1.4000416
Sun C, Fang N, Wu DM, Zhang X (2005) Projection micro-stereolithography using digital micro-mirror dynamic mask. Sensors Actuators A Phys 121:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2004.12.011
doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2004.12.011
Larson C, Shepherd R (2016) 3D bioprinting technologies for cellular engineering. In: Microscale Technologies for Cell Engineering. Springer, New York, pp 69–89
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20726-1_4
Hornbeck LJ (1996) Multi-level digital micromirror device
Arcaute K, Mann BK, Wicker RB (2006) Stereolithography of three-dimensional bioactive poly(ethylene glycol) constructs with encapsulated cells. Ann Biomed Eng 34:1429–1441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-006-9156-y
doi: 10.1007/s10439-006-9156-y
pubmed: 16897421
Chan V, Zorlutuna P, Jeong JH et al (2010) Three-dimensional photopatterning of hydrogels using stereolithography for long-term cell encapsulation. Lab Chip 10:2062. https://doi.org/10.1039/c004285d
doi: 10.1039/c004285d
pubmed: 20603661
Zorlutuna P, Jeong JH, Kong H, Bashir R (2011) Stereolithography-based hydrogel microenvironments to examine cellular interactions. Adv Funct Mater 21:3642–3651. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201101023
doi: 10.1002/adfm.201101023
Lee S-J, Nowicki M, Harris B, Zhang LG (2017) Fabrication of a highly aligned neural scaffold via a table top stereolithography 3D printing and electrospinning. Tissue Eng Part A 23:491–502. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0353
doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0353
pubmed: 27998214
Lee SJ, Kang HW, Park JK et al (2008) Application of microstereolithography in the development of three-dimensional cartilage regeneration scaffolds. Biomed Microdevices 10:233–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-007-9129-4
doi: 10.1007/s10544-007-9129-4
pubmed: 17885804
Knowlton S, Anand S, Shah T, Tasoglu S (2017) Bioprinting for neural tissue engineering. Trends Neurosci 41:31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2017.11.001
doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2017.11.001
pubmed: 29223312
Wüst S, Müller R, Hofmann S (2011) Controlled positioning of cells in biomaterials—approaches towards 3D tissue printing. J Funct Biomater 2(3):119–154
doi: 10.3390/jfb2030119
pubmed: 24956301
pmcid: 4030943
Lu Y, Mapili G, Suhali G et al (2006) A digital micro-mirror device-based system for the microfabrication of complex, spatially patterned tissue engineering scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res: Part A 77:396–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30601
doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30601
Mapili G, Lu Y, Chen S, Roy K (2005) Laser-layered microfabrication of spatially patterned functionalized tissue-engineering scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res: Part B Appl Biomater 75:414–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30325
doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30325
Shanjani Y, Pan CC, Elomaa L, Yang Y (2015) A novel bioprinting method and system for forming hybrid tissue engineering constructs. Biofabrication 7:45008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045008
doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045008
Ma X, Qu X, Zhu W et al (2016) Deterministically patterned biomimetic human iPSC-derived hepatic model via rapid 3D bioprinting. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:2206–2211
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1524510113
pubmed: 26858399
pmcid: 4776497
Zhang AP, Qu X, Soman P et al (2012) Rapid fabrication of complex 3D extracellular microenvironments by dynamic optical projection stereolithography. Adv Mater 24:4266–4270. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201202024
doi: 10.1002/adma.201202024
pubmed: 22786787
pmcid: 3789064
Miri AK, Nieto D, Iglesias L et al (2018) Microfluidics-enabled multimaterial maskless stereolithographic bioprinting. Adv Mater 30(27):e1800242
doi: 10.1002/adma.201800242
pubmed: 29737048
Nguyen AK, Narayan RJ (2017) Two-photon polymerization for biological applications. Mater Today 20:314
doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2017.06.004
Lee K-S, Kim RH, Yang D-Y, Park SH (2008) Advances in 3D nano/microfabrication using two-photon initiated polymerization. Prog Polym Sci 33:631–681
doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.01.001
Maruo S, Nakamura O, Kawata S (1997) Three-dimensional microfabrication with two-photon-absorbed photopolymerization. Opt Lett 22:132–134
doi: 10.1364/OL.22.000132
pubmed: 18183126
Ovsianikov A, Chichkov BN (2012) Three-dimensional microfabrication by two-photon polymerization technique. In: Computer-aided tissue engineering. Springer, New York, pp 311–325
doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-764-4_19
Serien D, Takeuchi S (2017) Multi-component microscaffold with 3D spatially defined proteinaceous environment. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 3:487–494. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00695
doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00695
pubmed: 33465943
Ovsianikov A, Mühleder S, Torgersen J et al (2013) Laser photofabrication of cell-containing hydrogel constructs. Langmuir 30:3787–3794
doi: 10.1021/la402346z
pubmed: 24033187
Warner J, Soman P, Zhu W et al (2016) Design and 3D printing of hydrogel scaffolds with fractal geometries. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2:1763–1770. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00140
doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00140
pubmed: 33440474
Bens A, Seitz H, Bermes G et al (2007) Non-toxic flexible photopolymers for medical stereolithography technology. Rapid Prototyp J 13:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540710719208
doi: 10.1108/13552540710719208
Huang Y, Zhang X-F, Gao G et al (2017) 3D bioprinting and the current applications in tissue engineering. Biotechnol J 2017:1600734. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201600734
doi: 10.1002/biot.201600734
Hutmacher DW (2000) Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21:2529–2543
doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6
pubmed: 11071603
Bose S, Vahabzadeh S, Bandyopadhyay A (2013) Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing. Mater Today 16:496–504
doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.11.017
Izatt MT, Thorpe PLPJ, Thompson RG et al (2007) The use of physical biomodelling in complex spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 16:1507–1518
doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0289-3
pubmed: 17846803
pmcid: 2200746
Chu TMG, Orton DG, Hollister SJ et al (2002) Mechanical and in vivo performance of hydroxyapatite implants with controlled architectures. Biomaterials 23:1283–1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00243-5
doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00243-5
pubmed: 11808536
Zhu W, Qu X, Zhu J et al (2017) Direct 3D bioprinting of prevascularized tissue constructs with complex microarchitecture. Biomaterials 124:106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.042
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.01.042
pubmed: 28192772
pmcid: 5330288
Zhou X, Zhu W, Nowicki M et al (2016) 3D bioprinting a cell-laden bone matrix for breast Cancer metastasis study. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:30017–30026. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b10673
doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b10673
pubmed: 27766838
Nasrollahi S, Pathak A (2016) Topographic confinement of epithelial clusters induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in compliant matrices. Sci Rep 6:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18831
doi: 10.1038/srep18831
Peela N, Sam FS, Christenson W et al (2016) A three dimensional micropatterned tumor model for breast cancer cell migration studies. Biomaterials 81:72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.039
doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.039
pubmed: 26724455