Terminology and Etymology in Oculoplastic Surgery.
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
27
3
2020
medline:
10
10
2020
entrez:
27
3
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To provide a collection of important terms in oculoplastic surgery, their etymology, current usage, and clarification of terms with overlapping or often misconstrued definitions. Commonly employed terms in oculoplastic surgery were collected, and their etymologies were determined. The authors then examined how these terms are being currently used in the published literature to determine how closely their usage matched the origin of the terms, if any terms had developed multiple meanings, or if multiple terms were being used to describe the same concept. This article assembles in one area much of the important terms in oculoplastic surgery, highlighting how the etymology of the terms both links to their meanings as well as clarifies the appropriate usage of terms that have evolved to develop several different definitions. Special attention is placed on clarifying the correct definitions of closely related but distinct terms. Most terms in ophthalmology are used in a uniform manner across the literature with definitions closely matching their etymology, but some terms in oculoplastic surgery are being used in a potentially confusing overlapping manner and warrant clarification.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32209937
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006346
pii: 00001665-202006000-00048
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1088-1090Références
Bukhari A. Etiology of tearing in patients seen in an oculoplastics clinic in Saudi Arabia. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2013; 2:198–200.
Ishikawa E, Sabundayo MS, Kono S, et al. Patency of the lacrimal drainage system in patients with a peripunctal tumour. Orbit 2019; 1–5.
Lu B, Xie HY, Shi CP, et al. Effects of medication methods after simple and effective probing of lacrimal passage. Int J Ophthalmol 2014; 7:868–871.
Vrcek I, Starks V, Mancini R, et al. Use of an ultrasonic bone curette (Sonopet) in orbital and oculoplastic surgery. Proc (Bayl Univ med Cent) 2015; 28:91–93.
Kind R, Kiraly L, Taneri S, et al. Flushing versus not flushing the interface during small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 2019; 45:562–568.
Maia M, Furlani BA, Souza-Lima AA, et al. Lutein: a new dye for chromovitrectomy. Retina 2014; 34:262–272.
Baujat B, Krastinova D, Bach C, et al. Orbital morphology in exophthalmos and exorbitism. Plast Reconst Surg 2006; 11:542–550.
Cruz AA, Akaishi PM, Arnaud E, et al. Exorbitism correction of faciocraniosynostoses by monobloc frontofacial advancement with distraction osteogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 2007; 18:355–360.
Beji S, Fatma B, Chebbi A, et al. A case of exorbitism in association with Wegener's granulomatosis with renal involvement. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2012; 23:330–333.
Diaz-Siso JR, Gibson TL, Plana NM, et al. Zygomatic rotation-advancement: a new concept for the correction of exorbitism in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 31:178–182.
JP Medical Ltd, Khurana AK, Khurana B. Comprehensive Ophthalmology. 6th ed2015; 78.
Patel B. In praise of precision: esoglobus and exoglobus. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 33:72–73.
Barry K, Jackson J, Williams K. The tearing patient. Dis Mon 2016; 63:68–71.
Barka S, Garai I, Kukuts K, et al. Clinical utility of SPECT/CT and CT-dacryocystography- enhanced dacryoscintigraphy in the imaging of lacrimal drainage system obstruction. Ann Nucl Med 2019; 33:746–754.
Shen GL, Ng JD, Ma X. Etiology, diagnosis, management and outcomes of epiphora referrals to an oculoplastic practice. Int J Ophthalmol 2016; 9:1751–1755.
Pepper O. Medical Etymology; the history and derivation of medical terms. 2nd ed.1950; Philadelphia, PA: W. B Saunders Company, 181.