Challenging frontiers in neuroplastic cranial reconstruction: addressing neurosurgical wound healing complications through interdisciplinary collaboration - an observational study.
Free flap
Necrosis
Question mark shaped incision
Scalp reconstruction
Wound dehiscence
Journal
Acta neurochirurgica
ISSN: 0942-0940
Titre abrégé: Acta Neurochir (Wien)
Pays: Austria
ID NLM: 0151000
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Oct 2024
29 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
19
08
2024
accepted:
21
10
2024
medline:
30
10
2024
pubmed:
30
10
2024
entrez:
30
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Although rare, complications like skin dehiscence and necrosis after neurosurgery pose significant challenges by increasing the risk of infections spreading to the epidural, subdural, or intracerebral spaces. This retrospective, single-center study aims to assess the prior clinical courses, neuroplastic repair, and outcomes of patients with skin defects following cranial neurosurgical procedures, and to outline our interdisciplinary reconstructive protocol. A retrospective analysis was performed on cranial surgeries conducted at the Department of Neurosurgery, spanning from 2017 to 2023. Patients with skin defects requiring the combined expertise of neurosurgery and plastic surgery for effective treatment were included. The sizes of the skin defects were measured using intraoperative photographs analyzed with the freeware ImageJ software, version 2018. All patients provided informed consent for the surgeries. If informed consent was not possible due to neurological deterioration, consent was sought from adult representatives or next of kin except for acute circumstances. All patients admitted to our hospital agree to the pseudonymized use of their medical data and tissue specimens for research purposes in their treatment contract. A cohort of 24 patients experiencing wound healing complications after neurosurgical procedures underwent a total of 29 interdisciplinary surgeries for the reconstruction of skin, dural, and bone defects. After the neuroplastic surgery, 8 out of 24 patients (33.3%) developed surgical complications, with 6 of these requiring revision surgeries due to persistent cranial infection. In all cases, permanent wound closure was successfully achieved following adherence to the proposed treatment algorithm. Our study underscores the necessity of an integrated neurosurgical and plastic surgical approach to effectively manage wound healing complications in a single stage surgery. Key interventions include differentiation between necrosis and gaping lesions, alongside precise management of neurosurgical issues like cerebrospinal fluid fistulas and hydrocephalus. Plastic surgical expertise in assessing the possibilities and limitations of both local and free flap surgeries is essential.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
Although rare, complications like skin dehiscence and necrosis after neurosurgery pose significant challenges by increasing the risk of infections spreading to the epidural, subdural, or intracerebral spaces. This retrospective, single-center study aims to assess the prior clinical courses, neuroplastic repair, and outcomes of patients with skin defects following cranial neurosurgical procedures, and to outline our interdisciplinary reconstructive protocol.
METHODS
METHODS
A retrospective analysis was performed on cranial surgeries conducted at the Department of Neurosurgery, spanning from 2017 to 2023. Patients with skin defects requiring the combined expertise of neurosurgery and plastic surgery for effective treatment were included. The sizes of the skin defects were measured using intraoperative photographs analyzed with the freeware ImageJ software, version 2018. All patients provided informed consent for the surgeries. If informed consent was not possible due to neurological deterioration, consent was sought from adult representatives or next of kin except for acute circumstances. All patients admitted to our hospital agree to the pseudonymized use of their medical data and tissue specimens for research purposes in their treatment contract.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A cohort of 24 patients experiencing wound healing complications after neurosurgical procedures underwent a total of 29 interdisciplinary surgeries for the reconstruction of skin, dural, and bone defects. After the neuroplastic surgery, 8 out of 24 patients (33.3%) developed surgical complications, with 6 of these requiring revision surgeries due to persistent cranial infection. In all cases, permanent wound closure was successfully achieved following adherence to the proposed treatment algorithm.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our study underscores the necessity of an integrated neurosurgical and plastic surgical approach to effectively manage wound healing complications in a single stage surgery. Key interventions include differentiation between necrosis and gaping lesions, alongside precise management of neurosurgical issues like cerebrospinal fluid fistulas and hydrocephalus. Plastic surgical expertise in assessing the possibilities and limitations of both local and free flap surgeries is essential.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39472344
doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06328-z
pii: 10.1007/s00701-024-06328-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
432Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Anslow P (2004) Cranial bacterial infection. Eur Radiol Supplements 14(3):1–1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2049-7
doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-2049-7
Butenschoen VM, Weitz J, Ritschl LM, Meyer B, Krieg SM (2021) CSF disturbances and other neurosurgical complications after interdisciplinary reconstructions of large combined scalp and skull deficiencies. Neurosurg Rev 44(3):1583–1589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01347-7
doi: 10.1007/s10143-020-01347-7
Chen B, Li W, Chen D et al (2017) Partial titanium mesh explantation cured post-cranioplasty implant-associated scalp infection. J Clin Neurosci 44:196–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.060
doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.060
Chung J, Lee S, Park JC, Ahn JS, Park W (2020) Scalp thickness as a predictor of wound complications after cerebral revascularization using the superficial temporal artery: a risk factor analysis. Acta Neurochir 162(10):2557–2563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04500-9
doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04500-9
Denewer A, Khater A, Farouk O et al (2011) Can we put a simplified algorithm for reconstruction of large scalp defects following tumor resection? World J Surg Onc 9(1):129. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-9-129
doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-9-129
Desai SC, Sand JP, Sharon JD, Branham G, Nussenbaum B (2015) Scalp reconstruction: an algorithmic approach and systematic review. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 17(1):56–66. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2014.889
doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2014.889
Di Rienzo A, Pangrazi P, Riccio M, Colasanti R, Ghetti I, Iacoangeli M (2016) Skin flap complications after decompressive craniectomy and cranioplasty: proposal of classification and treatment options. Surg Neurol Int 7(29):737. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.193724
doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.193724
dos Santos Rubio E, Bos EM, Dammers R, Koudstaal MJ, Dumans AG (2016) Two-stage cranioplasty: tissue expansion directly over the craniectomy defect prior to cranioplasty. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Reconstruction 9(4):355–360. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1549011
doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549011
Ducic Y (2009) Reconstruction of the scalp. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 17(2):177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2009.01.001
doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2009.01.001
Gerstl JVE, Rendon LF, Burke SM, Doucette J, Mekary RA, Smith TR (2022) Complications and cosmetic outcomes of materials used in cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy—a systematic review, pairwise meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir 164(12):3075–3090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05251-5
doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05251-5
Gordon CR, Huang J, Brem H (2018) Neuroplastic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 29(1):4–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004063
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004063
Gupta P, Srivastava S (2022) Reconstruction of scalp with local axial flaps. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74(Suppl 2):2265-2272
Iaccarino C, Kolias AG, Roumy LG, Fountas K, Adeleye AO (2020) Cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy. Front Neurol 10:1357. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01357
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01357
Kim JS, Park IS, Kim SK et al (2015) Analysis of the risk factors affecting the surgical site infection after cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy. Korean J Neurotrauma 11(2):100. https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2015.11.2.100
doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2015.11.2.100
Krishnan KG, Müller A, Hong B et al (2012) Complex wound-healing problems in neurosurgical patients: risk factors, grading and treatment strategy. Acta Neurochir 154(3):541–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1221-0
doi: 10.1007/s00701-011-1221-0
Kwiecien GJ, Sinclair N, Coombs DM, Djohan RS, Mihal D, Zins JE (2020) Long-term effect of cranioplasty on overlying scalp atrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg - Global Open. Publish Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003031
Leedy JE, Janis JE, Rohrich RJ (2005) Reconstruction of acquired scalp defects: an algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(4):54e–72e. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000179188.25019.6c
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000179188.25019.6c
Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ, Pusic A (2006) Scalp reconstruction. J Surg Oncol 94(6):504–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20487
doi: 10.1002/jso.20487
Okochi M, Komuro Y, Ueda K (2019) Emergency microsurgery for patients with soft tissue, skull, and dura complex defects after trauma: a case report. Case Rep Plast Surg Hand Surg 6(1):99–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/23320885.2019.1691922
doi: 10.1080/23320885.2019.1691922
Okochi M, Okochi H, Sakaba T, Ueda K (2019) Soft tissue augmentation using free tissue transfer for Artificial Bone infection or Skull Bone Sequestration after Neurosurgery. J Reconstr Microsurg Open 04(01):e1–e8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1678702
doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1678702
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH image to imageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9(7):671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089
Schuss P, Vatter H, Marquardt G et al (2012) Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: the effect of timing on postoperative complications. J Neurotrauma 29(6):1090–1095. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2011.2176
doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2176
Steiner D, Horch RE, Eyüpoglu I et al (2018) Reconstruction of composite defects of the scalp and neurocranium—a treatment algorithm from local flaps to combined AV loop free flap reconstruction. World J Surg Onc 16(1):217. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1517-0
doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1517-0
Takanari K, Araki Y, Okamoto S et al (2015) Operative wound-related complications after cranial revascularization surgeries. JNS 123(5):1145–1150. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.12.JNS132602
doi: 10.3171/2014.12.JNS132602
Thavarajah D, Lacy PD, Hussien A, Sugar A (2012) The minimum time for cranioplasty insertion from craniectomy is six months to reduce risk of infection- a case series of 82 patients. Br J Neurosurg 26(1):78–80. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2011.603850
doi: 10.3109/02688697.2011.603850
Uzun H, Bitik O, Ersoy US, Bilginer B, Aksu AE (2018) Comparison of musculocutaneous and fasciocutaneous free flaps for the reconstruction of the extensive composite scalp and cranium defects. J Craniofac Surg 29(7):1947–1951. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005052
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005052
Veldeman M, Daleiden L, Hamou H, Höllig A, Clusmann H (2021) An altered posterior question-mark incision is associated with a reduced infection rate of cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy. J Neurosurg 134(4):1262–1270. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.2.JNS193335
doi: 10.3171/2020.2.JNS193335
Wang HT, Erdmann D, Olbrich KC, Friedman AH, Levin LS, Zenn MR (2007) Free flap reconstruction of the scalp and calvaria of major neurosurgical resections in cancer patients: lessons learned closing large, difficult wounds of the dura and skull. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(3):865–872. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000240830.19716.c2
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000240830.19716.c2
Yoshioka N, Tominaga S (2018) Titanium mesh implant exposure due to pressure gradient fluctuation. World Neurosurg 119:e734–e739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.255
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.255